Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose can be described as an assurance that a product sold with a specific objective would be capable of serving its function. The seller guarantees that the product being sold is adequate to the particular purpose for which it is made. The case RICHARD LEVY, AN INFANT, ETC. v. STANLEY PAUL, T/A ETC. is an example of a breach of implied warranty of fitness for human consumption. In this case, we have Richard Levy as the plaintiff and Stanley Paul as the defendant. Richard Levy is a three-year-old infant who developed food poisoning after eating contaminated food at Stanley Paul’s restaurant on August 11, 1963. The suit was made by the child’s mother, Betty Levy, and it was intended to recover $25,000.00
