Rhetorical Analysis On Cesar Chavez

During the 1960s many of those in need fought for liberty to end oppression in America and have equal rights. The time period of the Civil Rights Movement a leader Martin Luther King Jr. sought justice by love and nonviolent acts. After the assassination of Dr. King Jr. an activist Cesar Chavez speaks out to his audience that believes violence is the answer, and don't take violence seriously to better society's problems. In fact, Cesar wants to show it worsens the lives of many innocent people because threatened violence creates frustration on both sides. Chavez presents to his audience by proving being resistant, and not fighting back has proved to shown success. Chavez uses moralistic logic and crucial juxtaposition in his magazine he is …show more content…
Chavez is logical because he wants his audience to end violence among people. If violent acts occur due to discrimination, and there is not a form of unison many more people suffer. Just as prior when Dr. King was assassinated most people left with “anger” due to a different race color. Cesar wants his audience to see the “frustration” and how those affected are still reluctant, but still, want to prove that to his audience that they can change a society through unison to overcome justice without overcome justice without any torment. Since Chavez audience is ignorant about coming together with love and social justice, he wants to convince them to be on his side by using bandwagon to strengthen his position by wanting them to “participate actively in a cause”. In a cause to be committed fighting for change to end oppression and inequality. By tackling oppression he wants his audience too realize it may be difficult to overcome, but never impossible even if few refuse to talk about the problem of helping the poor. Chavez as a leader he wants his audience that diminishing torcher among those in need is a positive resolution in achieving