Descartes Meditation 1 Analysis

Improved Essays
What is doubt and how important it to recognizing it, is what Rene Descartes explains in his first meditation. In “ Meditation on first Philosophy in which the Existence of God and the Distinction between the Soul and the Body are Demonstrated” Descartes starts off his philosophical arguments by questioning his thought of truth and what he believes. He argues that there is doubt our truth and in our beliefs. In Meditation one, he argues two things; the Dream and the Evil Genius. In the beginning part of Mediation One, Descartes explains how our senses deceivable. He talks about how when he is sleeping he is also dreaming, he can sense real life objects at the same time, this causes him to almost be confused and not be able to tell if hes …show more content…
In the beginning of the First Meditation, Descartes mentions that God is good and because he is good he would not fool us into believing false things. If we do believe that, then we can not tricked by anything. Descartes states “ Perhaps God has not willed that I be deceived in this way, for he is said to be supremely good. Nonetheless, it were repugnant to his goodness to have created me such that I be deceived all the time, it would also seem foreign to that same goodness to permit me to be deceived even occasionally” ( Descartes, …show more content…
If this was true, and our senses are no good then how could we be a perfect human being, like God. He says “ But because being deceived and being mistaken appear to be a certain imperfection, the less powerful they take the author of my origin to be, the more probable it be that I am so imperfect that I am always deceived.” ( Descartes, 534) Descartes perspective on his opinions fall short as he wants to start to clearing his mind without disruptions.He closes out Meditation One by saying that the evil genius will arrive and will deceive everything he assumes is true. “I will not suppose a supremely good God, the source of the truth, but rather an evil genius, supremely powerful and cleaver, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me” (Descartes, 535) He has so much doubt that he is eventually led into thinking nothing is real but the evil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes reality principle asserts that the reality of the cause is at least as great as the reality of the effect and is what brings about Descartes first proof of the existence of God. Understanding the word “God” to mean some infinite substance, a supremely intelligent being is a part of his essence. According to Descartes, the cause of this idea could only be something with infinite substance. This also means that God cannot be a deceiver as fraud and deception are defects and it a contradiction; it is impossible for a perfect being to have defects. Thus, “It is impossible that God would ever deceive me” (Descartes).…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Barry Stroud and Elizabeth Wolgast provide different approaches to answer and understanding of the paradigm established in the argument. The context of the argument from ignorance that Descartes proposes is problematic when attempting to answer it . In Wolgast’s perspective, the argument from ignorance claims that the knowledge that one is not dreaming is a necessary condition to determine the existence of the external world. Under such circumstances, Wolgast claims that by considering ‘know’ as a necessary condition, then it becomes more difficult to provide evidence that will suffice the skeptic—…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His initial premise, doubting reality, follows the process of thinking regarding the mind's perception of its environment. The body and mind are separate in Descartes' understanding. Though they work in tandem, human experience is dependent on the mind. The body is merely a vessel for the mind, and its senses cannot be trusted to determine reality. The mind, then, is what must be examined to determine the scope of reality.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says in the first meditation he is doubtful about all the things he thinks he knows, and in the second meditation he states that he believes he exists when he thinks he exists. Descartes concluded that whatever he truly believes in clearly and distinctly therefore then must be…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that “deception is incompatible with God”. This conclusion is based on a relatively simple argument. Descartes makes the assumption that deception is sign of imperfection. He maintains that while the ability to deceive is impressive, the desire to deceive is inherently imperfect and weak. God, however, is perfect in all ways and thus deception is incompatible with God.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes work ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’ is filled with his many ideas on God, the relationship between the mind and body and the trustworthiness of things we believe to be true. The main focus of this essay is his arguments for distrusting the senses. These are the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. Meditations begins with Descartes casting doubt on everything he once believed to be absolutely true. It is a search for absolute certainty.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It can also be cognizant of bodily things, such as seeing, hearing, and feeling. Although he can do all of these things, Descartes decides they are only true when he is awake, and false when he is asleep. Sensing and thinking are one and the same. He finds it odd that bodily things are more distinctly known than the “I”, even though he knows he exists. Descartes realizes what is happening, and lets his mind “wander” and doesn’t confine it to limits.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Huemer’s essay, “The Lure of Radical Skepticism,” he expands on the idea that ‘we cannot know anything,’ by outlining four different arguments supporting the claim. (Huemer 47-57) René Descartes holds the opposite opinion, which he discusses in ‘Meditations One and Two.’ While there is validity to both sides of the argument, Huemer’s essay proves to be more reliable after dissecting Descartes’ concepts of existence. Huemer proposes that no one can know anything about the external world, or anything that exists outside of the mind.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Descartes arguments are not to be taken as too literal, I do think he is correct that our senses can be easily deceived. The information we receive from our senses can be mistrusted and ruin the…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes, especially in his First Meditation, condemns the ability of sensation to provide information about the natural world and humans’ surroundings. Although he believes that humans must trust their senses to understand the obvious, he believes that not all perceptions can be trusted as bodily senses can be deceptive to internal understanding. However, a problem arises: how can one contemplate everything that is perceived around them as false? Certainly, unknown truths must reside in experiences not yet encountered especially those that require interactions with distant places and unfamiliar ideas. Descartes argues that these unfamiliarities are produced by pure introspection, but it can be argued that communication with a superior being allows humans to fully understand their supposed innate ideas.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’ search for truth begins on the premise of radical doubt. Which is to say that all we have been taught to believe is true is actually false. His searches for truth by eliminating falsehoods and radical doubt is a result of this. He explains this in his first meditation by likening our minds to a basket of apples. To get rid of the bad apples which have started to go off, it makes sense to first tip out all the apples from the basket and put them back one by one, after careful inspection to make sure they have no signs of rot.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays