Here the author adopts a top-down view, primarily centering his discussion on the official religion that was sanctioned by the imperial state, although there is also some discussion of local gods. While there is lots of fascinating material, this is arguably the weakest chapter in the book. Often the author goes off-topic and the narrative tends to be somewhat episodic. For instance, the section that covers the Period of Division (220–589) hardly discuses the pantheon at all, but instead rehearses familiar themes about the dominant patterns of church-state relationships that were formed during this remarkable
Here the author adopts a top-down view, primarily centering his discussion on the official religion that was sanctioned by the imperial state, although there is also some discussion of local gods. While there is lots of fascinating material, this is arguably the weakest chapter in the book. Often the author goes off-topic and the narrative tends to be somewhat episodic. For instance, the section that covers the Period of Division (220–589) hardly discuses the pantheon at all, but instead rehearses familiar themes about the dominant patterns of church-state relationships that were formed during this remarkable