Non Traditional Forms Of Marriage

The dilemma presented in the textbook illustrates a case arguing over non-traditional forms of marriage, specifically, regarding the implications of allowing same-sex marriage. The question is; can one open up marriage relationships to other varieties of non-traditional forms of marriage such as gay marriage, and if so where do we draw the line, for example are polygamous relationships acceptable.
In terms of ethical relativism, both personal and social relativism share the same notion when it comes to allowing non-traditional forms of marriage. As ethical relativism holds that there are no universally accepted ethical standards for individuals, there cannot be an objective standard that would be forced onto all of us. Every person encompasses …show more content…
Naturally, the drive for such non-traditional marriages are not based on immoral motives, but based on a shared sense of companionship – be it between same sex partners, or between several partners. Thus, as the intentions appear to be genuine, and the interest in non traditional marriages appears to be an act of love, this does not expose harm to anyone else. As a result, a virtue ethicist would be inclined to approve non traditional marriages as they can further cultivate personal growth, which will ultimately enhance one’s moral …show more content…
Firstly, the opinion derived from a virtue ethicist’s perspective was rather enlightening. Here, the main focus was placed on the individuals involved, as no one else should be affected by these non traditional marriages. As a result, acting on one’s love is positive as it fosters personal growth, for the right reasons, which will adopt superior moral decisions in the future. This leads to a stronger society, as no one will need to hide their love, or feel threatened by it. People who wish to be in non-traditional marriages now can move on to improving other aspects of their lives. Furthermore, the utilitarianisms perspective helped validate my decision as “greatest happiness principle” was made clear, especially in regards to same sex marriages. The sole critique with same sex marriage was the inability to procreate, however if they can have babies by adopting or using a surrogate mother then they are doubling the happiness as they get a baby and the one aiding them will feel good or relieved as well. Thus, I would support all non traditional forms of marriage as simply the individuals involved were being oppressed before, while everyone else has been allowed to love and be loved by their loved