Television shows such as Law and Order: SVU have brought the concept of repressed and recovered memories to pop culture. Repressed and recovered memories can be described as memories of traumatic events from childhood, that is forgotten then recalled later in life. This is a controversial topic in the mental health community; with the draw surrounding the validity of these memories. Working with doctors and researchers, judges within the court circuits must pick a position to get the justice deserved. The psychology field has debated about the concept of repressed and recovered memories. The biggest contest comes from two major standpoints: repressed memories are a safety mechanism by the body or that they are implanted by an outside source (Geraerts, 2009). The strongest side seems to come for the “debunking” of this medical phenomenon. It has been shown many times of therapists
…show more content…
Believers understand that memories are pushed away as a survival mechanism, and therapeutic assets assist in finding them; not simply creating them. Eileen Franklin’s case proves this. Over the course, Eileen’s memories came back. It was instantaneous as people believe. Instead, it came from similar instances to the main event and came back in pieces. Her memories were so vivid and detailed it led to the arrest of her father for the murder of a young child (Loftus, 1993). Regarding child sexual abuse, the FIA test had shown that those who had spontaneous memory recovery, had no evidence of false recall (Geraerts, 2009). A second experiment had resulted in the evidence that memories recalled within therapy were corroborated by evidence (Gerarets, 2007). Advisories to repressed memories believe that those who experience this should be shocked by what information has come to light. However, outside factors associated with the abuse may not be a surprise (Gerarets, 2007). It instead confirms an underlying
Believers understand that memories are pushed away as a survival mechanism, and therapeutic assets assist in finding them; not simply creating them. Eileen Franklin’s case proves this. Over the course, Eileen’s memories came back. It was instantaneous as people believe. Instead, it came from similar instances to the main event and came back in pieces. Her memories were so vivid and detailed it led to the arrest of her father for the murder of a young child (Loftus, 1993). Regarding child sexual abuse, the FIA test had shown that those who had spontaneous memory recovery, had no evidence of false recall (Geraerts, 2009). A second experiment had resulted in the evidence that memories recalled within therapy were corroborated by evidence (Gerarets, 2007). Advisories to repressed memories believe that those who experience this should be shocked by what information has come to light. However, outside factors associated with the abuse may not be a surprise (Gerarets, 2007). It instead confirms an underlying