C.G.S.A. § 52-575.
a) No person shall make entry into any …show more content…
It has to be so open, obvious and apparent that the owner has the opportunity to declare their title rights. See Klein v. De Rosa, the law admits that after 15 years, the proprietor has consented with the usage.
The Reasoning
The easement helps increase the value of the property than utterly facilitating a passage to the grantor. The absence of inheritance in terms are insignificant when the easement is listed clearly as appurtenant to the property. Consequently, the appellant has incorrectly acted by installing a barrier because the plaintiffs acquired their easements by grant and necessity to use the spur passage over the defendant's land and neither have they rejected their property.
Holding
The Supreme Court held the trial court did not err in the conclusion of the easement transferred to the plaintiffs and they were entitled to the relief that the court