Rawls Theory Of The Veil Of Ignorance

Improved Essays
This extract sheds light upon Rawls' theory of the "veil of ignorance." Through this theory, Rawls' focuses on highlighting the importance behind the formation of a society from an "original position" where each individual though thoroughly informed about the facts of the world, is oblivious about himself in terms of his social status, class position, wealth, health, natural talents, opportunities, characteristics etc. The idea behind Rawls' theory is for the individuals within a society to think beyond their own self concerns, and consider the well-being of the society as a whole. Rawls' understood the fact that an individual operates on the basis of their own self-interest. For example, if an individual's rich, they might as well be in favour …show more content…
Society’s standing at this “original position”, and operating from behind a "veil of ignorance" has been described by Rawls as a way of ensuring the emergence of a much fairer, just society that focuses on maximising the position of the least well-off individual. Rawls' does not assume that individuals functioning from behind the “veil of ignorance” would be altruistic or selfish in terms of their decision-making, but would operate in such a way as to benefit themselves in the society. Obliviousness about one’s own self prevails under the theoretical concept of the “veil of ignorance”, and thus, this will most likely lead to the members of the society focusing on formulating decisions that are considered just and fair, taking into account the position of the society as a whole. With this, Rawls’ believes freedom in terms of equal rights for an individual with “similar liberty for the others" will prevail. Moreover, though social and economic inequalities are likely to exist, they should be countered by the availability of equal opportunity for all, thus curbing the chances of the existence of nepotism and unfair …show more content…
Rawls’ focused on how the principle of liberty can be explained through reference to three separate factors. The three factors include the agents (individuals, organisations and institutions) that are considered free, the limitations that these agents are considered to be free from and the final factor focuses on what these agents are free to do and what they have been prevented from doing. According to his viewpoint, these three factors should be based on the notion of liberalism for it gives way to tolerance within a society and its members. Furthermore, Rawls heavily encouraged the formation of a "position of equality" within a society which yet again, coincides with the concept of liberalism. He also supports social cooperation and supports the use of the free market in terms of governmental policies, for example, the right to private property. Both, the principle of difference and that of equal opportunity can be explained in terms of liberalism for they focus on bettering the position of the least well-off individual, thus aiming at the creation of a fair society that is heavily based on the notion of equality. Rawls’ viewpoints based on the use of the government can also be regarded as part of the liberal school of thought for liberals are considered to be in favour of the workings of a welfare

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main distinguishing component of the original positions the veil of ignorance. Rawls’ suggests us to imagine ourselves having no idea about who we are and where we stand in society. By being ignorant to our circumstances we can decide what will benefit our society without any bias…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A free society necessitates the preservation of rights while still granting individuals within the society the freedom to do as they please - as long as their behaviors do not infringe on the rights of others. In free societies, inequality is inevitable. As a result, a governing body may be employed to monitor the scale of inequality and deliberate what must be done to combat major issues that hamper the progress of a nation. On one side of the spectrum, where John Rawls stands, individuals argue that some sort of government intervention is necessary to promote equality so a nation can reach the height of progress. On the other side of the political spectrum, where Robert Nozick stands, people view government intervention as a hindrance to…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration also creates a social hierarchy with Blacks being at the bottom because of being labeled a drug addict/user and a criminal, which in Rawls’ perspective is an injustice because its placing certain individuals higher than others. Rawls would view the situation the same as he viewed distribution of wealth and income, except the moral inquiry would now be the distribution of a negative good which would be punishment among individuals pertaining particularly to certain racial groups. Therefore, if Rawls proposed a solution, it would be that although there would still be some type of punishment institution to house those who are a severe threat to the community in order to protect society, we would choose arrangements that would respect the humanity of each individual. Also he would also examine the “social division of responsibility” between society and individuals. For example when we are about to arrest or convict an individual for possessing or deal drugs, one must also consider everything to ensure that each individual continues to face a decent opportunity for a good life.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Veil of Ignorance John Rawls proposed a strategy, which he called the veil of ignorance, for figuring out which social traditions were simply and which were out of line. The veil of ignorance foundation is as per the following: a lead is simply if everybody would consent to it given that they were made unmindful of their position in the public arena. That is, the fair society would be picked by individuals who had put aside contemplations of their own sex, riches, race, parentage, etc. In a perfect world this rule wipes out individual inclination from the decision and therefore ensures the reasonableness of principles. In any case, even behind the veil of ignorance there won't be accord as to which rules are ideal, tossing into question the…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles Mills Democracy

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This, he writes, is a hypothetical situation where political decision makers are rational, do not care about the affairs of their peers, have a sense of justice and what is good, and operate under a veil of ignorance. It is this same hypothetical veil of ignorance which is both the most important element to this theory working, but also what breaks it. Under a veil of ignorance, those making decisions on behalf of society will not know who they are going to be in said society. This, Rawls states, leads them to make moral decisions which, if anything, work to the advantage of the least fortunate. Unfortunately, as effective as this may actually be in addressing the issues with democracy today, there is no real way to carry this out in the real world.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5 To set a common standard viewpoint by which to judge the various means of allocating what Rawls calls primary goods, such as rights, powers, opportunities, income, wealth, and the bases for self-respect, he postulates a "veil of ignorance" that assumes that one's position and situation in life is not known. " "To ensure the values of a constitutional democracy, which Rawls feel is the best kind of government since it allows for pluralism as well as stability, a constitutional consensus must be achieved through equal rights, a public disclosure on political matters, and a willingness to…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, the first principle of Rawls - is essentially the principle of freedom. Basic freedoms are 1) political freedom (the principle of "equal participation" in the political process defined by the constitution), 2) the rule of law, or legal state 3) freedom of conscience. The second principle of justice of Rawls is formulated as follows that social and economic inequalities are to be settled in such a way as to lead to the greatest benefit of the least successful and that positions in society has to be open to all, with the subject of compliance with fair equal opportunity. Principles of justice Rawls relies on a strategy known in game theory as a "maximin" and implies the maximization of the minimum result. Thus, according to Rawls, the person in the original position inevitably chooses a society in which the least successful will be in the best possible position.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These people would not see the need to take advantage of others for their benefit because that would not be a rational decision. In fact, disadvantages would be detrimental to Rawl’s theory of social justice because it interfers with the idea that individual needs should be addressed. Similar to the capacity theory, Rawl’s assumption for a just society aligns well with Sen’s theory on evaluating individual…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Rawls, the original position is a device that is used to represent every citizen as free and equal beings. In the original position, people decide and establish the laws and principles that they will live under by using the veil of ignorance, which lets them make decisions solely based on their notions of morality. This is because the veil of ignorance precludes people from knowing anything about themselves, including their own abilities and social classes; thus, they cannot make choices based on their own personal…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the main focuses of John Rawls Veil of Ignorance is removing yourself from the situation and making an unbiased decision that makes the most sense for everyone involved in the situation. Rawls' Veil of Ignorance "asks readers to decide what rules of distributive justice should apply to society" (Sanger & Rossiter, 2011, p.380). This means that before making a decision, you must put yourself in the shoes of every person involved to try to find a solution that benefits everyone equally. If I were in the situation of the editor and had a to fix an overtime problem the first step for me would be to completely remove myself from the equation and make an objective decision by considering the impact that my decision would make on everyone…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Based off his own views of fairness and justice, Rawls would consider Rousseau’s ideal society fair. This conclusion is only made when considering what is at the core of Rawls’ desire for fairness: justice. Rousseau’s emphasis on security is of little concern to Rawls. However, Rousseau’s belief of liberties and equality follow Rawls’ own belief of fairness as justice. For Rawls, a practice is fair when none of those participating in it feel they are not only being compelled to give in to illegitimate claims, but also feeling they are being taken advantage of.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays