Rational Choice Theory: Why The Offender Would Commit A Certain Crime

Great Essays
Abstract

This paper will focus on a theory that I have chosen that will best explain why the offender would commit a certain crime. In doing so, I will talk about robbery, what it is, according to UCR definition, the rates in which crime occurs nationally and in the State of NY. Characteristics of the offenders and their race, gender and age. Also I will be discussing the potential relationship between the victim and the offender and its data. The first part of this paper I will be using UCR and NCVS data. The second part of this paper will introduce the theory I’ve chosen which is Rational Choice Theory and I will discuss about what it is, its important parts and concepts and use that to apply it to my crime. In other words, I will present why my Rational Choice Theory best applies to Robbery.

Diaz 3 What is Robbery? The UCR website
…show more content…
RCT is part of the classical school which was developed by the Italian social thinker Cesare Beccaria. People who commit a crime are not afraid of law breaking because they enjoy what comes to them and want to take even bigger chances. “RCT is based on simple assumption that human beings are rational and self-interest motivated in their everyday actions” (Sinisa,2002). Its concepts include three important key factors to committing a crime. First is if they rob a bank for example, do they need the money for something important? Second, how well do they perform with the crime? Do they know what they’re doing or just Diaz 5 going in for fun? Lastly, is them robbing, gets them a reward for it and feel that what they did is a good thing for themselves?

Rational Choice Theory with

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Routine activity approach is the study of the human offender or the most likely to commit crime when there is a target, and no capable guardian. It was proposed and coined by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson in 1979 (Miller, 2006: 81). Cohen and Felson based their theory on a rational choice model, in which people make rational decisions in ways that will be to their advantage, with as little disadvantage as possible (Akers, 2004: 26). It is a subfield of criminology and rational choice. The development of this theory was in response to the surge of crime rate in the united between 1947 and 1974(Cohen, 1979: 588).…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a combination of influences that contribute to the willingness of a person to commit a crime, such as biological and social factors. Criminologists have generated many theories to describe the reasoning of committing…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are Beccaria’s ideas still relevant today? The classical view of criminology has never disappeared either in America or in some other countries. Rational choice theory takes many of the classical ideas and makes them, perhaps, even more relative to today’s issues. Rational choice theory is no different from the principles espoused by Beccaria: Individuals have free will and using this free will they make rational choice to either commit – or refrain from coimmitting – crimes.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gottfredson and Hirschi also integrated elements of rational choice theory into the development of their theory (John Liederbach). If criminals opportunity presents itself to an individual with low self control then crime is likely to…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment was done in October 1972 through 1973. This experiment was conducted to determine if changes in patrolling had an effect on reducing crime, changing the public perception on police, reducing fear on crime within the community and also to help address the public concerns with the police. The researchers had three types of experiment also known as “beats” the first beat was proactive patrols- where police patrols were visibly increased by two to three times. Some by vehicles. The second beat was Reactive where no routine patrol was available but officers responded to 911 calls.…

    • 2430 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Rational Choice Theory is about pro’s and con’s and how the person would weigh up in the cost of committing the crime against the benefit of committing the crime. Example, the badge of honour which explains that a young offender committed a crime that offender would be brought to the court and punished with an ASBO order that offender justified their actions as by committing crimes they gained respect from their peers or gang members within the…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rational choice theory (RCT) and situational crime prevention (SCP) are two different things, but they go hand-in-hand. The two articles discussed in this paper are surrounding this topic. The first article written by Hayward criticized RCT and SCP, while Farrell’s article countered Hayward. Farrell’s argument was more compelling than Hayward’s stating that RCT and SCP are the best theories to follow, although they do have room for improvement. First let’s define what rational choice theory, and situational crime prevention is.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In simple terms, rational choice theory is the view that crime is a function of a decision making process, in which the potential offender weighs the potential costs and benefits…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the literature above suggests, it is quite difficult to deter whether or not robbers are actual rational actors, however, I must argue that I do not believe robbers to rational actors. There are many cognitive aspects of robbery in which robbers display irrational decisions for both their involvement in crime and in the way they enact the crime, such as being expressively motived to commit the…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The goals can be financial, pleasure, or some other beneficial result. The Rational Choice Theory perspective as presented by Cornish and Clark (1985) is based upon three concepts; (one) criminal offenders are rational and make choices and decisions that benefit themselves; (two) a crime- specific focus is required; and (three) there is a distinction between choices related to criminal involvement and decisions related to criminal events. The theory of rational choice theory examines offender decision making and the factors that affect it such as assessments of risks, rewards, and morality of various behaviors (Clarke, 1983). The balance between likely risks and rewards influences offenders target selection (Clarke, 1983). According to Brantingham and Brantingham (1984), the level of risks is one of the factors that make a target good or bad.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rational choice theory “states that people will make rational decisions based on the extent to which they expect the choice to maximize or minimize their profits or benefits and minimize the costs and losses” (Akers et al, 2017). In classical criminology people believed that offenders calculated the rewards and punishments before offending. Individuals may still engage in crime after having indirect experiences through general deterrence such as punishment avoidance. For example, a 15 year old might make the rational choice to shoplift from a candy store because one of her friends has done it before and the entire store did make her leave and the friend was still able to keep the stolen items. Through the fifteen year olds indirect experience with her friend avoiding legal punishment after committing a crime, the fifteen year old make the rational decision that the benefits of stealing outweighed the consequences.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The previous section showed the strong similarities between the characteristics of a “good burglar” and Mr. Nordahl. First among them is his attention to detail. By controlling as many variables as possible, he was able to lower the risk involved. This included, avoiding drugs and violence, understanding his tools, targeting particular houses, and studying the items he intended to take. This all points to Nordahl’s ability to make rational decisions as to when and where to commit a crime; a characteristic also noted by Siegel.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many factors taken into consideration when individuals commit crimes such as, the punishment one would receive, the success they would receive and who it would benefit. Crime is broken for personal reasons, it is a cost benefit analysis (Hayward, 2007). The offender determines the advantage of criminal behaviour. Rational choice theory assumes that an individual is egotistic (Boudon, 2003). It is perceived that an individual who commits an unlawful act is mainly concerned with only themselves.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rationality: the classical school of thought in criminology assumes that people are having free will and they elect to commit…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Criminology is a subject which aims towards discovering the reasons behind an individual’s choice to commit crime and their behaviour in some situations. By understanding a person’s motives to commit a crime, criminologists can try and prevent crime from happening. Several criminologists developed their own theories which explain why people commit crime, what makes them do it and also how we can prevent individuals from committing a crime again. The main theoretical perspectives examined in this essay are Biological Criminology and Psychological Criminology.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays