Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Essay

Improved Essays
I Casey Nichols representative of North Carolina fully support the long overdue ratification of the Constitution. The Articles Of Confederation are impuissant and short-lived.An continued absence of a new document that conclusively clarifies our affairs will inevitably lead us to defeat. It was unquestionably imperative that we held the constitutional convention. The rationale is quite evident considering all the affairs we don't have elucidations for.It was primarily held to fix all of our concerns, but in our denouement we realized we had to compose a whole new document. The Articles of Confederations are flawed and lacking immensely.Congress is essentially powerless.They can't collect taxes and they can't regulate our foreign trade and interstate commerce.Why is this significant you might ask? Well,the government is constantly lacking money,economic quarrels are breaking out, and it's almost impossible to arrange trade with other countries.Also we basically have no way to modify the document because everyone has to …show more content…
The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties.The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ratifying the Constitution The Articles of Confederation which established a governmental structure to unify all the states that fought in the American Revolution. The Articles of Confederations purpose was to create a confederation of states which soon failed. The reason the articles failed was because the Congress and the national government had not been given enough power to work efficiently. The Constitution was going to take over the place of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the War of Independence, the founding fathers sought to create a government unlike any that the world had previously seen. With their recent experiences under British rule, the United States did not want a powerful central government; therefore, they created a document in which all the power went to the states, the Articles of Confederation. When this document proved to be weak, the Founding Fathers began to re-evaluate their stance on a central government. This led to the idea of ratifying the United States Constitution. The Federalists, who supported the ratification, attempted to promote the ratification through a collection of essays called the Federalist Papers.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the summer of 1787, twelve out of the original thirteen states of the United States of America gathered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for what was known as the Constitutional Convention. It was previously twelve years ago in 1777 when the Thirteen Colonies of the British Empire gained independence and formed what is known as the United States of America. The founders of the Articles of Confederation, the United States’ first attempt at a government, was recognized as being too weak and unable to maintain order. As a result, fifty-six state delegates, including James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams among them, assembled at the Convention. Their intentions were to fix the Articles of Confederation and create a stronger federal authority…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the outbreak of the American Revolution, the Continental Congress created the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union in 1777 in order to keep all thirteen states united. However, the Articles of Confederation proved to be weak in the long term, as Congress had almost no power and could not enforce any decisions, as states had supreme power. Because the nation was in danger of collapse, delegates from five states attended the Annapolis Convention in order to discuss trade issues between states. The Constitutional Convention was called to revise the Articles of Confederation in the hopes of overhauling the national government. The main conflict at this convention was the concept of representation.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation marked the death of the 13 Colonies and the birth of the United States of America, a country of it’s own after fighting with a superpower for so long. After being controlled and constrained by Britain for centuries, the now-Americans were afraid of the government becoming a second Britain. The new American government drafted the Articles of Confederation in 1777, the first law of their new country, and to avoid creating another restrictive government, the Articles were extremely limited federally and failed to provide a strong government in terms of economics, law enforcement, and government. These issues can be shown by just a few of the restraints on the federal government: the inability to print national currency,…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was designed to unify the country and give the United States the ability to create a unified army and fight back to gain our freedom. It accomplished its goal, but the United States soon realized that in order to preserve their freedom and get out of the debt from the war, they were going to need to make a stronger government. That is why they changed from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution. The Constitution gave the central government more power in order to make alliances with other countries for trade and commerce, as well as taxing and raising armies to defend the country against any other invading country. The country would not have survived for very long under the Articles of Confederation due to its lack of strong central power.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation provided a short term government but not one that was long lasting, or had the ability to be long lasting. America's first constitution was very much flawed and was going to be very difficult to fix. The purpose of the Articles was to be able to have a government right after America declared independence from Britain. The authors of the confederation were very much scared of a strong central government because of what Britain had done before.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The anti-federalists argued that the Constitution represented a step away from the democratic goals of the American Revolution and toward the monarchy and aristocracy. Thus, they felt it gave too much power to the federal government and took a lot of power away from state and local governments. In addition, they believed that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen. Moreover, they feared the nation was too big for the national government to respond to the concerns of people on a state and local basis. Last, they worried that the original text of the Constitution did not contain a bills of rights.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our country is too young to be able to make a constitution without many faults and flaws. Let’s not rush the process, we do not need this document right away, we can take our time with forming it. This is a nation built by God, let us give it our best and not our worst. A poor constitution would be detrimental to the United States of America. Not only would it…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luis Vazquez Dr. Espinoza POLS-2305-93L April 23, 2018 The development of the American Constitution in 1787 accompanied a battle between opposing political philosophies concerning the future of the United Stated and its structure. The Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay favored the newly formed Constitution whom believed the central government would work with an organized checks and balances as well as separation of powers. In the other hand, the Anti-Federalists led by Patrick Henry, James Winthrop, and George Mason thought the Constitution would not be able to protect the right of the people; thought the new nation was too large to be governed by a central authority. Although both were correct in their political…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People call me a federalist because I support the constitution; but I say I am just a man who believes in what is right. We have tried living with the Articles of Confederation, but they just do not work. It is time for a change in our government. That change should be the constitution. If I were to talk about all the reasons why the constitution should be used, we would be here all night.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Democracy Vs Constitution

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Since 1787 the Constitution has been contributing to a more unified and flourishing America. Even though it’s 200 years old, it is still appertaining citizens today. Three famous reasons will prove just why this is so critical. “The constitution of the United States asserts that all power is inherent in the people.”…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists believed that the Constitution covered the natural rights given to a citizen, while the Anti-Federalists believed that the creation of a Bill of Rights was necessary to protect the individual rights of the…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays