R V Heale Case Study

Justice was balanced to the victims, the offender and society within the case R v Siale [2017] NSWSC. Justice was served for the victim as the offender received a lengthy sentence for the crime committed. The offender gained justice as he had a fair trial in the eyes of the court. Justice was also received for society as they maintain the safety of the community, but also the rehibition of the offender to become a better member of society.
Justice was served for each party. For the offender, he was given a fair trial. With unbias Jury who handed down a verdict to the judge. The judge handed a fair sentence, being doing so it would be less likely to re-offend, less likely to drink and become violent again. The offender also had a right to decide his plea, which was not guilty of murder. The offender was also supplied with a defence barrister, who pleaded the offender's cause of assault causing …show more content…
Society has the right to have justice operating effectively, this means a fair trial with the defender and the victim's compensation. society member will sympathise with and support the rights of the victim. Society members have the rights to basic human rights to be protected. The Society also believes the offenders do too, this refers to a fair trial and treatment of the accused. The rules that evidence must be presented a balance the rights of society and the accused. Inadmissible evidence cannot be allowed for the fairness of the trial. If the evidence is incorrect, it could lead to an appeal, which will affect society rights of safety. The way the offender was treated can cause community concern and media outrage. This is significant to society as human rights haven't been met, but also the victim's rights to not have media coverage. In R v Siale, Siale was denied bail, this is because leaves the victims and society at