Punitive Sentencing Report

Improved Essays
One of the underlying challenges of recidivism that results in high rates of incarceration are the punitive sentencing guidelines. It is acknowledged that the sentencing policies of the war on drugs era resulted in rapid growth in imprisonment for drug charges. Additionally, severe sentencing laws such as mandatory minimums keep offenders convicted of drug charges in prison for lengthier periods of time (NeSmith, 2015). Harmon (2013) states that because the mandatory minimum statutes are written so generally, many low-level offenders are impacted, including many who do not present a threat to society and who could be effectively disciplined with shorter sentences. To be specific, 91% of the defendants’ sentences under the mandatory minimum

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, we see minimum harsh punishments given to drug criminals because the court system, in order to save money and other resources, doesn’t want to hear the drug court cases. When drug cases appear in court, it is up to the judge to decide the sentencing for the criminal. Many judges are awarding these criminals with a minimum harsh sentencing right away, making everything easier for the courts by not even having the case go to court. According to the book, The New Jim Crow, written by Michelle Alexander, “‘The value of a mandatory minimum sentence lies not in its imposition, but in its value as a bargaining chip to be given away in return for the resource-saving plea from the defendant to a more leniently sanctioned charge’”…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Government Accountability Office found that thirteen out of seventeen drug courts recording “post-program recidivism,” or the tendency for a criminal to commit the same crime after release from a rehabilitation program, measured a decrease between four and twenty-five percent (142). These three instances prove that drug courts really do decrease the percentage of rearrests.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper examines the effectiveness of drug treatment courts. In the past, there are many ways in which drug treatment courts are scrutinized. For purposes of this paper, the effectiveness of drug treatment courts will be evaluated through rates of recidivism. This paper describes the drug court model and how it differs from traditional courts. It will take a look at the history of drug treatment courts detailing how they became a part of the United States of America’s criminal justice system today.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harsh minimum sentencing practices around drug offences exist because of the Reagan administration’s rhetoric that blamed drugs as the primary cause of violent crime in the US during the 1980s. Prior to Reagan’s “War on Drugs” era, drug crime in the US was relatively minor, however, beginning in 1980, the number of prisoners in jail for drug related offences skyrocketed. While there were just 41,100 of these prisoners in 1980, by 2010 that number had tripled, an increase of 1,100%. One of the biggest reasons for this seemingly outrageous increase is mandatory minimums, a system devised to enact harsher sentences for first time offenders, with the goal of making them reluctant to commit the same crime again. In her book, The New Jim Crow, professor…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Minimums

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence “at the most intense levels of drug use, drugs and crime are directly and highly correlated and serious drug use can amplify and perpetuate preexisting criminal activity”. Taking this into consideration, it is not hard to understand why so many people are in support of more severe sentences in response to drug related crimes. While the effectiveness of the use of mandatory minimums to reduce drug related crimes is questionable, supporters of mandatory minimums make some compelling arguments that apply to all mandatory minimums not just those set on drug…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the last few decades, the U.S. population of incarcerated citizens exploded from around 300,000 to more than 2 million, with drug convictions accounting for a majority of the increase. The War on Drugs functions more realistically as…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over half of the prisoners in the federal system are incarcerated for nonviolent drug offenses because of mandatory minimum sentencing. (NeSmith, 2015). Not only do they have damaging repercussions mentally but they also negatively affect the families of those punished by minimum sentencing. Because judges were unsure and untrained on how to use their discretion there was little to no appellate review on sentencing.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drug Courts

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specialized courts have been instrumental in deviating the impact of overpopulated and taxed prison systems. Accordingly, they provide an environment that allows drug abusers to correct their behavior and lessen recidivism for similar crimes (Drug Courts, n.d.). The advantage of having a drug courts improve the treatment an offender gets and allows them to take charge over the positive changes in their day-to-day lives. The National Institute of Justice has found that recidivism rates drop significantly around 17%-26% depending of the programs used and assignment of judges over the length of time done (Do Drug Courts Work? Findings From Drug Court Research, n.d.).…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the implications of Reagan's War on Drugs laws, drug courts have demonstrated and proven to reduce recidivism for offenders who abuse substances. To deter overcrowding in the prisons, Researcher Messer has found that drug courts can be instrumental in deterring offenders from reoffending. It is surprising that “85% of offenders incarcerated require substance abuse treatment” (Messer, 2016). Drug courts allow offenders to “attain important skills/ideas, improve relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment” (Messer, 2016). Researcher Shaffer studied over “80 drug courts and found recidivism rates of 46% for those who participated in drug court programming”…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The research attempts to ascertain the impact that mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines have had on the criminal justice system as a whole in the United States. With its advent, mandatory minimum sentences have arguably had an economic impact on the justice system, particularly in corrections systems. Due to the fact that there are now more people being incarcerated for longer periods because of these sentencing guidelines, prisons are bearing an increasing cost for housing these inmates. Another factor that the research looks into is the inequities that are inherent when sentencing a non-violent offender with a sentence that is as stringent if not more so than those who have committed violent felonies. The repercussions these guidelines…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Debate on the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Guidelines Brief History During the mid-20th century, the federal court rulings on felonies under the existing laws provided the judges with unlimited discretion, having no clear guidelines on what was to be done. The mandatory minimum punishments for severe federal offenses were outdated and could not be used to in the modern-day trials. Under the 1790 Crimes Act, the minimum sentence for treason, murder, or forgery of government securities was death. However, in the years that followed, the members of the legal community argued that this practice bring about disparities in the manner that the judges’ sentences similar cases (Batey, 2002). As it would appear later on, this criticism became the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Criminal Justice System has many problems, but one of the most prominent problems deals with the issues surrounding mass incarceration. Mass incarceration in itself deals with a multitude of problems. The main problem that I am going to focus on is the incarceration of low level offenders. In the United States 1 in 5 incarcerated individuals are locked up for a drug offense (Wagner 2017).…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though president Nixon is often seen as having started the modern war on drugs, his administration’s actual role in drug policy legislation and enforcement never lived up to the inflated rhetoric surrounding the issue. The war on drugs, from a policy standpoint, was largely created under the Reagan administration. Despite having fewer than 2% of the American public reporting that they believed drugs were the most important issue the country faced (Alexander, 2010 p. 49), the Reagan administration announced its war on drugs in 1982. Unlike Nixon’s rhetorical war on drugs, the Reagan administration began creating impactful laws and enforcement mechanisms. Beginning by transferring funds from drug education and drug treatment programs into drug related enforcement mechanisms was only a small indicator of what was to come next.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    mandatory minimum sentencing causes someone who may use marijuana for personal purposes to be imprisoned for the same amount of time as someone who sells marijuana on a large scale or other violent crimes. The surprising fact that mandatory minimums are mostly applied in the federal court for drug cases shows the percentage of persons that are likely to be sent to prison for a long period of time thus increasing the prison population. Subsequently reducing, removing mandatory minimum or decriminalizing marijuana reduces the amount of people being issued a sentence of blind justice by the judge who has no discretion will have a domino effect upon the amount of people in prison for non-violent drug offenses such as marijuana possession. Among people who receive mandatory minimum sentences in 2011, 38 % were Latinos and 31 % were black, this shows a correlation between racial disparities and mandatory…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recidivism Research Paper

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When asked, “Just what is recidivism?” some might answer, “criminal offenders who repeat criminal offenses.” While the response is a broad, generalized interpretation of the question, various determinants are involved regarding the meaning of recidivism. To provide a more distinct understanding of the subject, Siegel (2017) defines recidivism as, “relapse into criminal behavior after apprehension, conviction, and correction for a previous crime (p. 8). While Siegel’s definition provides clarity, one can also examine various causes that contribute to recidivism rates, as well as, its effect on the legal system.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays