Public Art is ubiquitous through agricultural. From a small building to a monument, numerous people are not aware of how an art can change the perspective of the community. Their inability to interpret and analyze the artwork that the artists were hired create many problems such social, arigcultural and political issues. Because of that, some people criticize the impact of the public to the community that result in demolishing the art project. Harriet Senie believes that the communities including business and government has to evaluate the impact of the public with background information of the history once the contemporary art is featured. She addressed this issues with Richard Serra’s Art “Titled Arc” that was removed in front of federal
…show more content…
Senie examined that most people did not have any brief art education through agricultural thus lacking their interpretation of the object. With expectations of creativity in contemporary art, people forget to state their concern about their community such as public space. Given a public space in the front of the building will create some suggestions on the developer of what to put in the space. Some suggestions such as the fountain or benches bring a friendly environment that please people’s need. Some suggestions also include a display of public art for attraction. However, the site of the building creates an imbalance view between the street and the architecture when a piece of artwork is place in the middle of the space. When Serra's Titled Arc art project was placed in front of the government building, the project did not harm anyone; yet people criticizes his art of style in his project. This suggest that people believed that Serra’s art impends the style of the agriculture even if Serra meet the government’s standards. Also, when the artists try to exceed the criteria from the developer, that artist use their own view instead of the people’s view to create a masterpiece that result in debatable of public art of the community. Even if artists have some historical information through art, people fail to recognize it as contemporary
Senie examined that most people did not have any brief art education through agricultural thus lacking their interpretation of the object. With expectations of creativity in contemporary art, people forget to state their concern about their community such as public space. Given a public space in the front of the building will create some suggestions on the developer of what to put in the space. Some suggestions such as the fountain or benches bring a friendly environment that please people’s need. Some suggestions also include a display of public art for attraction. However, the site of the building creates an imbalance view between the street and the architecture when a piece of artwork is place in the middle of the space. When Serra's Titled Arc art project was placed in front of the government building, the project did not harm anyone; yet people criticizes his art of style in his project. This suggest that people believed that Serra’s art impends the style of the agriculture even if Serra meet the government’s standards. Also, when the artists try to exceed the criteria from the developer, that artist use their own view instead of the people’s view to create a masterpiece that result in debatable of public art of the community. Even if artists have some historical information through art, people fail to recognize it as contemporary