Unit 1 web programming 1 written assignment
Title: Run the HTML validating Tool Software
Please provide the following explanations and answers in a single document and submit it using the Assignment activity below.
1. Identify 3 web sites, which you've visited in the past. Run the HTML validating software against each site. You can select any of the validating tools available online.
2. Provide comments on results of your exercise for each web site. Make sure to list any problems identified. Also provide a link to the validation tool you used.
3. for each site answer: What works well on this site? What could be improved?
Introduction:
If am not wrong I have submitted my assignment based on the given …show more content…
Like
• srs- which is stated Address of the resource,
• type- Type of embedded resource
• chareset- Character encoding of the external script resource
• async- Execute script in parallel
• defer – Defer script execution
• crossorigin – How the element handles crossorigin request and
• Nonce – Cryptographic nonce used in content security policy checks [CSP3] and so on--. And yahoo document checking completed with more information.
*The third and the final website I have searched in this assignment is firefox.com, and the information I got in the command result has huge different in terms of the numbers of information. Because the total information I fund from the run is just five and even from this command four of them are Warning and only one command has been recorded as Error even that was a minor one I think. Other than that all command suggested warning; for example:-
• Warning - this document appears to write in English. Consider adding this is full attached command
Title: Run the HTML validating Tool Software
Please provide the following explanations and answers in a single document and submit it using the Assignment activity below.
1. Identify 3 web sites, which you've visited in the past. Run the HTML validating software against each site. You can select any of the validating tools available online.
2. Provide comments on results of your exercise for each web site. Make sure to list any problems identified. Also provide a link to the validation tool you used.
3. for each site answer: What works well on this site? What could be improved?
Introduction:
If am not wrong I have submitted my assignment based on the given …show more content…
Like
• srs- which is stated Address of the resource,
• type- Type of embedded resource
• chareset- Character encoding of the external script resource
• async- Execute script in parallel
• defer – Defer script execution
• crossorigin – How the element handles crossorigin request and
• Nonce – Cryptographic nonce used in content security policy checks [CSP3] and so on--. And yahoo document checking completed with more information.
*The third and the final website I have searched in this assignment is firefox.com, and the information I got in the command result has huge different in terms of the numbers of information. Because the total information I fund from the run is just five and even from this command four of them are Warning and only one command has been recorded as Error even that was a minor one I think. Other than that all command suggested warning; for example:-
• Warning - this document appears to write in English. Consider adding this is full attached command