To start with, limiting how much soda a person can consume, enforces restrictions that violate a person’s daily life. According to Sidney Anne Stone, the author of the text ‘’Ban the Ban!’’ she says,’’ when you take away the option to order a soda over a certain size, you have now removed my options.’’ ( Stone, 287) To further explain, Stone shows that by constricting how much soda someone can have, it eliminates a person’s ability to control their life. And it stops them from living their life, how they want to. Furthermore, Sidney Anne Stone also believes that putting a maximum limit on the amount of soda someone can drink, addresses a bigger problem that comes from the soda ban. She states, ‘’People might think its is not important because …show more content…
Even so, in the real world, people have to face challenges that constrict these rights; for instance the soda ban. Regardless, enforcing the soda ban is a terrible idea because it places a restraint on a person’s life, has countless loopholes, and it doesn’t have a great effect on stopping a person from digesting high quantities of sugar. There is a fine line between a sensible idea and one that is completely illogical. This is an unreasonable obstacle that doesn’t effectively help others, and it blocks the personal freedom of a human