It is an ordinary Act of Parliament and can be repealed or amended through conventional legislative process. Courts have obligation that interpretation of legislations should be congruent to the Convention rights. Superior courts are granted power to officially declare an act to be conflicting with the Convention rights. The legislatures can then decide whether to amend the Act. The main difference between entrenched and non-entrenched bill of rights is, the judiciary in countries with non-entrenched bill of rights is not empowered to declare an act as invalid. New Zealand enacted New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (1990). Legislatures are empowered to pass statues conflicting with the Bill of
It is an ordinary Act of Parliament and can be repealed or amended through conventional legislative process. Courts have obligation that interpretation of legislations should be congruent to the Convention rights. Superior courts are granted power to officially declare an act to be conflicting with the Convention rights. The legislatures can then decide whether to amend the Act. The main difference between entrenched and non-entrenched bill of rights is, the judiciary in countries with non-entrenched bill of rights is not empowered to declare an act as invalid. New Zealand enacted New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (1990). Legislatures are empowered to pass statues conflicting with the Bill of