This is because “Kant’s central principle that the imperatives of morality be “universalized” so as to apply to all, and that in all our actions we respect the other as an “end in itself” and never merely as a means to our own desires” (The Golden Rule In Kant and Utilitarianism) where “Utilitarianism’s stress upon maximizing the interests and happiness of the greatest number, clearly seem resonant with the spirit of the golden rule.” (The Golden Rule In Kant and Utilitarianism). Both Kantianism and Utilitarianism have to do with respecting others no matter their religious views, gender, sexual orientation, race and color. This ties into respect and therefore, I believe that AT&T should have their diversity policy altered to where it stresses on respecting others because it should not go against anyone’s systems of beliefs and anyone should be able to sign the policy without “religious beliefs prohibiting him from approving, endorsing, or esteeming behavior or values that are repudiated by Scripture” (Buonanno v. AT&T
This is because “Kant’s central principle that the imperatives of morality be “universalized” so as to apply to all, and that in all our actions we respect the other as an “end in itself” and never merely as a means to our own desires” (The Golden Rule In Kant and Utilitarianism) where “Utilitarianism’s stress upon maximizing the interests and happiness of the greatest number, clearly seem resonant with the spirit of the golden rule.” (The Golden Rule In Kant and Utilitarianism). Both Kantianism and Utilitarianism have to do with respecting others no matter their religious views, gender, sexual orientation, race and color. This ties into respect and therefore, I believe that AT&T should have their diversity policy altered to where it stresses on respecting others because it should not go against anyone’s systems of beliefs and anyone should be able to sign the policy without “religious beliefs prohibiting him from approving, endorsing, or esteeming behavior or values that are repudiated by Scripture” (Buonanno v. AT&T