Pros And Cons Of Coal

Improved Essays
Coal is one of this world’s source of energy and it is also a fossil fuel that is nonrenewable. Coal is considered a fossil fuel because it is from vegetation that grew years ago. It is burnt to produce electricity. Coal is one of many was that electricity is generated in the United States. Some ingredients in coal are used to make plastic, fertilizers, medicines, and tar. The United States, Russia, India, and China uses coal a lot. It impacts the environment, both positively and negatively.
Coal has had a good effect economically, it has provides a lot of jobs for people. Using coal to produce energy has some benefits to it. There is an abundant supply of coal around the world which is good because the big countries in the world use coal
…show more content…
Coal burning affects the environment in a bad way. It produces gases like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide and mercury which adds to pollution to the environment. When sulfur dioxide is in the air it then becomes sulfuric acid, when is the main component of acid rain. The burning of coal also makes a massive amount of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas which is a cause of global warming and climate change. Coal has to be mined which creates dust that floats around the air near the mine. The miners have a risk of breathing in the particles from the dust and that can clog up their airways to the lungs. Coal worker’s pneumoconiosis is also known as black lung disease is very common among coal miners because of how much exposure they have to coal dust. China is one of the world’s largest producers of coal and they have the most deaths due to coal production. According to New York Times, “Burning coal has the worst health impact of any source of air pollution in China and caused 366,000 premature deaths in 2013.” China is one of the biggest countries in the world and their population is still growing, which means more resources like coal will be used. The death rates in coal production areas will increase over the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In short, one of Lomborg's boldest claims was that cheap fossil fuels would improve lives. He reasoned that with the use of coal, countries have vanquished the spectre of poverty that haunts many, and that fossil fuels will continue to be an integral part of our daily lives. Upon closer examination of Lomborg's strand of argument, it is revealed that one of its biggest flaws is the blatant omission that several poor countries already have access to cheap fossil fuels through fuel subsidies. In fact, the biggest subsidies are in developing nations, spending more than $400 billion yearly protecting their population from high fuel prices (Stephen and Adam, 2012). Therefore, it is evident that Lomborg's argument is fundamentally invalid.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every and anyone need or used coal in some way shape or form. This kept all of the people in Appalachia having a job. But as the time went on the use for coal has dropped. People are reverting to alternate uses other than coal.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is mined from our oceans and within our earth to provide energy, gas, and fuel for heating homes, fueling vehicles, and factory use around the world. In relation to global needs, these energy sources contribute to the economy, as McKibben claims, "It is economic growth. "(par.13). Carbon dioxide is the only pollutant that is not reduced because of fossil fuels, and its economic value to people on Earth. However, as long as we continue to utilize fossil fuels for its oil, coal, and gas properties, we will be contributing to the demise of our unique precious home.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fracking Issues

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In fact, shale gas emits only one-half of the carbon dioxide per unit of energy that coal does. Also, coal will release mercury into the air. The mercury eventually finds its way back into the soil and waters…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emissions of carbon dioxide and methane will contribute to global warming. Methane warms up the climate 80 times more than the amount of a 20 year period of carbon dioxide emission. In addition to pollution, health is a problem too. The workers who work for fracking companies, will likely have respiratory problems, cardiovascular problems, effects on fetal / child development and effects on the reproductive system after/before they retire. They are also likely to be a danger to their family, because of the contaminated shirts, pants, hats and boots that they bring home everyday after…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Along with the burning of diesel fuel to transport the wastewater and materials and the operate the machines to extract the gas (Role 277). People living near the fracking sites and the workers of these sites are affected by the pollution radiating from these fracking sites. People are becoming ill due to the pollution in the air and water. The workers of these sites have a job, but this particular job has been proved to be dangerous and has cost many their…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nearly 75% of the chemicals will affect the skin, eyes, and other sensory related organs, 40%-50% affect the brain and nervous system, immunity, cardiovascular, and kidneys, and 25% could cause cancer or genetic mutation. Even small exposure to chemicals such as those used in fracking can cause detrimental health effects, and long term effect still have yet to undergo studies, to uncover just how bad toxic exposure can be. It had been recently discovered that radon gas levels are 39% high near areas in which fracking occurs. Radon, being a odorless, tasteless, invisible gas, is the second leading cause of lung cancer. An estimated 21,000 of the death caused by lung cancer, are because of radon exposure.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But its striped away and destroy for coal, it is worse fossil fuel because it does the most damage to the environment near and people and a solid byproduct that has nowhere where it can be store safely. Near the Appalachian mountains is where the most coal extracted and used, mountains are being…

    • 1087 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Do you think coal mining is worth the risk involved or not? Some people might think it is. But some might think it isn't. For me I think it isn't. I am going to tell you 3 ways I think coal mining isn't worth the risk.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Murray Darling Basin is a large area inside of south-eastern Australia. They are to major rivers Murray river and the Darling river, It goes over most of the states of New South Wales, Victoria, and Australian Capital Territory .It also goes over parts of the states, e.g, Queensland (lower third) , South Australia (south-eastern corner).Some facts about the Murray Darling basin is that the river is one of Australia’s longest ever river. The Murray River flows between Mount Kosciuszko (Southern Alps) and Goolwa (South Australia), The river is also more than 60 million years old. The Murray Darling is a big long river that is located in Australia, this river is a historical river and a major tourist point.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coal Vs Nuclear

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sulfur dioxide promotes heart disease and asthma. Coal-burning plants are industrial polluters States producing about one-third of our carbon dioxide (CO2, a major contributor to GLOBAL WARMING), 40% of our mercury (highly TOXIC if ingested), one-quarter of our nitrogen oxide (found in smog) and two-thirds of our sulfur dioxide (a part of acid rain). But yeah, let’s all continue using this source of energy because it is SO good for the planet. It totally Super-duper helpful and safe (sarcasm).…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fracking can be devastating to the environment and the health of the community that lives near any fracking operation. There have been many cases documented where families that either live near a fracking site or that have even allowed fracking companies to frack on their land, having unusual symptoms that are related back to fracking. These symptoms can be but not limited to fatigue, burning eyes, dermatologic irritation, headaches, upper respiratory problems and many more. Along with these health risks that fracking causes directly, there are other long term harms that fracking contributes to. Air pollution is one of them, when you burn natural gas that is extracted by means of fracking you are releasing greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Alison Riddell of Stanford University, production of oil, coal and natural gas is expected to rise by double. Additionally according to Alison Riddell, in 1997 the world produced 130 quadrillion btu of energy from oil whereas now every year we use 11 billion tons of oil in fossil fuels (ecotricity.co.uk). The problem with fossil fuel gasoline and production is that it is not renewable and our supply is very limited. Therefore we are running out of enough to supply the globe. This will then increase demand and prices will raise creating a huge economic crisis.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coal is also a very useful carbon-based material. Coal can be used as a source of fire and energy or in the smelting of metals to make them stronger. For many centuries, it has been used a source of fuel. Many generations would not have been able to survive if it weren’t for the energy stored in coal. The book also does not fully discuss all of the uses of graphite.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays