War, atomic bombs the days before and now, peace
Atomic bombs wouldn't never have made such a strong impression in my mind if they hadn't caused "The two bombings"-the historic event in the human history and then led the world to the Atomic Age.
These are generally information about "Little Boy" and "Fat man":
The atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, which killed between 129000 and 226000 people, claimed to be carried out for stopping the last long WW2 and decreasing the casualties of both sides: "Japan announced its surrender to the Allies on August 15, six days after the bombing of Nagasaki the Japanese government signed the instrument of surrender, effectively ending World War II." {1}
If we say War is fiend, so are Atomic Bombs the sons of War even though they were generated to contribute ending up their mother? Yes, because they are sons of demon, they are special in their own ways: killing back their mother and then obtained the appelation which used to belong to their mother: ‘’The most barbarous demon.” …show more content…
That is normal to say:" There isn't anything wrong here for countries to maintain and develop those atomic weapons." However, it's a little bit difficult to accept that atomic bombs still be able to be used in the future like they used to be, but it must be in very very far future because luckily nowadays countries have strong solidarity. Whereas, people all over the world really solicitous about the propect of the world if there appeared any nuclear war again. That is the reason why there are lots of people have voted against keeping atomic bombs in countries. However, it will never be approved: the governments cannot spend massive amount of time and money making modern atomic weapons to destroy all of those things
Atomic bombs wouldn't never have made such a strong impression in my mind if they hadn't caused "The two bombings"-the historic event in the human history and then led the world to the Atomic Age.
These are generally information about "Little Boy" and "Fat man":
The atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, which killed between 129000 and 226000 people, claimed to be carried out for stopping the last long WW2 and decreasing the casualties of both sides: "Japan announced its surrender to the Allies on August 15, six days after the bombing of Nagasaki the Japanese government signed the instrument of surrender, effectively ending World War II." {1}
If we say War is fiend, so are Atomic Bombs the sons of War even though they were generated to contribute ending up their mother? Yes, because they are sons of demon, they are special in their own ways: killing back their mother and then obtained the appelation which used to belong to their mother: ‘’The most barbarous demon.” …show more content…
That is normal to say:" There isn't anything wrong here for countries to maintain and develop those atomic weapons." However, it's a little bit difficult to accept that atomic bombs still be able to be used in the future like they used to be, but it must be in very very far future because luckily nowadays countries have strong solidarity. Whereas, people all over the world really solicitous about the propect of the world if there appeared any nuclear war again. That is the reason why there are lots of people have voted against keeping atomic bombs in countries. However, it will never be approved: the governments cannot spend massive amount of time and money making modern atomic weapons to destroy all of those things