Pros And Cons Of Ancient Greek Government

Improved Essays
Government in Ancient Greece
University of the People
HIST 1421

“Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives” (Reagan, n.d.). In order for Greece to have order and civility, there needed to be certain officials that held power to make these city-states safe, and make proper decisions that benefitted them. Five of the major forms of government that once played a part in ancient Greece were Tyranny, Oligarchy, Democracy, Monarchy, and Aristocracy. Many associate the example of Queen Elizabeth when they hear the word “Monarchy”. Simply put, Monarchy is where royalty rules. Once promoted by Rome and Hellenistic kings, Monarchy was established by the London Conference of 1832, and is still used today (“Monarchy”, n.d.). Rule in a monarchy is hereditary, meaning you have to be of royal bloodline and fall next in line to rule. Finally in 1974, Prime Minister Konstantinos Karamanlis abolished Monarchy in Ancient Greece once and for all (“Monarchy”, n.d.). As the most popular, Democracy means “The People Rule”. Citizens used “drawing of lots”, or Sortition (“Athenian Democracy”, n.d.). This was used to appoint political officials, and became a common staple practice in Democracy (“Sortition”, n.d.). When the Athenian democracy was failing, and
…show more content…
Like Oligarchy, Tyranny was run by one ruler, usually of noble birth, and believed in oppression and obedience as a way of getting what they want from their people. However, Tyranny did not always have a negative label. In Ancient Greece, it originally meant “ an authoritarian sovereign without reference to character” (“Tyranny”, n.d.). The negativity came when the son of Peisistratus was murdered. Preferred by Athenians over kings or Aristocracy, Tyranny was avoided by Sparta. This was because Sparta needed to have unity against the Helots, and Tyranny usually meant support from the poor (The British Museum,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Athenian Government in 403 BCE Athens went through many changes in government structure, and eventually produced the most radical democracy of its time. The shape of the Athenian government in 403 BCE was especially important, because it changed from the oligarchy of the Thirty Tyrants, established by Sparta after the Peloponnesian War to a radical democracy. The radical democracy was successful and remained the shape of the Athenian government for around a hundred years. Athenians went through many government structures on their trip to democracy.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greek democracy appears to have ended as a result of both internal and external factors. Like the subsequent Roman Empire, the Athenian state appears to have over-reached in its militaristic ambitions, ultimately weakening it; while the relative strength of other empires enabled them to take Greece over. The imposition of rule by foreign empires finally ended Greek democracy. From internally, Athens moved from being a defender of its own nation to an aggressor though it would have no doubt maintained that this was in its national security interests. One of the consequences of this aggression and ambition was the loss of the alliances that had helped repel the Persians and in some cases their subjugation (Brand, n.d., p.28).…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From tyrannical to democratic institutions, the manner in which a particular polis maintained order was very dynamic, and adaptations were frequently implemented in response to a changing social environment, often due to imbalance of power or matters of war. Also, each city state had a constitution specific to their geographic jurisdiction; unlike the United States’ use of federalism, Greek poleis were not united under a conventional set of guidelines, but were rather united through similar language and religious practices. The natural susceptibility of Greek government allowed for modifications to be made; either in a controlled manner of popular vote, or through the revolt of tyrannicides such as Hipparchus and Hippias. Typically, an oligarchy, aristocracy, or monarchy proved to be the most efficient practice and often led to massive productivity through construction of temples and other civic edifices, improvements in water supply and distribution, and other advancements which wholistically benefitted the polis. However, these systems tended to favor the wealthy while silencing the voice of average citizens, putting them in an economic disadvantage, and deteriorating their political efficacy; traditionally, tyranny would subsequently follow.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Picture it! Sparta, 490 B.C. Sparta, a powerful city-state in ancient Greece, is known for learning one thing, war. Different from its neighboring city-state, Athens, boys were taken away from their mothers at the age of seven and were taught the art of war, instead of mathematics, Philosophy, and other subjects. The Spartans are also known for defeating thousands of enemy soldiers with only 300 Spartan men at the battle of Thermopylae (even though they all died.) Those are the things I do know.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The differences between the three primary forms of government, oligarchy, tyranny, and democracy are as follows: oligarchy is governmental rule being in the hands of a small group of men who belonged to wealthy families. This form of leadership could be found in the city-state of Sparta where its citizens were known for their military self-discipline. There were three parts that made up Spartan oligarchy: military chiefs who were assigned as the state’s religious leaders and generals of its army, council made up of elders (over sixty years old), and five overseers who created policies and made certain that the law was obeyed. Tyranny consisted of rule being in the hands of one person who forcefully obtained governmental control. Many tyrants…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny came after tyranny, it was a cycle which it could never be broken. Cleisthenes disliked tyranny, this was the reason why he was never chosen to be a ruler in the first place. Isagoras, raised to be an aristocrat as well, was chosen by the aristocrats over Cleisthenes when competing for power to rule Athens. Cleisthenes understood that he would not win because he did not have the mentality of a tyrant. He then later came to realize that people like him, with a different concept of how to rule would never have the chance to come to power because they would never fit in in the tyrant cycle, whereas, Isagoras, as a tyrant, was able to keep the cycle going.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After Athens’ defeat in the Peloponnesian War, Sparta established in Athens an oligarchy of 30. The oligarchy was highly unpopular, even to the point that it was nicknamed “the 30 Tyrants”. The oligarchy of 30 held power for little over a year, after which democracy was restored quickly. After the oligarchy of 30 fell, Athenian democracy remained for 80 years, but it never returned to the stability it had enjoyed during the Golden Age of Athens. After the fall of the oligarchy of 30, Athenians were insecure and fearful.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sparta’s government changed between two times. In times of peace, Sparta had an oligarchy of 30 elders, each over 60 years of age. The oligarchy also included an assembly of male adults and five ephors, which had unlimited power. Some have said that Athens had a better government, considering it was a democracy. While I understand their point of view, it is important to remember that a democracy takes longer to debate and argue about issues, while a monarchy and oligarchy can make faster decisions.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Athenian Attitudes Toward the Authority of State Through the Eyes of Plato and Sophocles The first evidence of democracy, a government in which the citizens have say in the rulings, was discovered in Ancient Athens. However, when we study Athenian history, we focus on the democratic system of government and tend to overlook the Athenian citizen’s points of view. Through close examination of the writings of Sophocles and Plato, one can discover that the Athenian’s respect towards the governing power, changed during the Classical Athens period. Although the Ancient Athenian government seemed to have control over its people, Antigone of Sophocles and Crito of Plato reveal that from 441 BCE to 360 BCE, the citizens began to lose respect for the…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In classical Greece, the different Greek city-states had different forms of government. The city-state of Sparta had an authoritarian government in which it enforced military participation for all males and only the elite class could gain power in the government. Athens on the other hand had a democratic government that allowed everyone to be able to participate in its government despite class standing and did not put their focus on defending the city. The totalitarian government that Sparta had caused life for the people living there to be unpleasant and difficult while the democratic government in Athens gave much more freedom to its citizens and resulted in the people their having a much more pleasant life. Sparta, during the…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greek and Roman views on Death & Afterlife. The Greeks and Romans saw passing in a mind-boggling manner. While their demise customs had numerous similitudes, the importance of death and the afterlife between the two cultures. In both societies, the dead 's groups looked after by the ladies.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When aristocrats became more oppressive and ruling for the benefit of their own, change was needed and tyranny came about, usually by a discontent noble supported by the middle class and a military force. However, due to the the harsh rule of tyranny, it was overthrown and replaced by the final step of the political system, democracy. This structure was prominent in both Athens and Corinth city-states. Although many changes occurred, each political stage in the archaic period ensured social stability and led to prosperity in trade and…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fortunately, Sparta was able to avoid the ramifications of tyranny and lived under a rule of…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Sparta

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many of the arguments against Sparta reason that government officials did not grant enough power to the people of the city-state, and therefore favor Athens. This is not the case. The kings, elders, and rulers of the Spartan government knew what was best for the citizens of Sparta, and, as a consequence, created strictly regimented rules that shaped Spartan lives for the better. Although Sparta did not have a significant amount of participation in law by common people, it was able to create and sustain an advanced city-state through discipline and a form of government that placed stress on health and military supremacy. Discipline was a major part of the reason Sparta became such a superior power in the ancient world, and…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays