Process Essay: How Supreme Court Works

Improved Essays
How the Supreme Court Works
Not all cases presented to the Supreme Court are heard by the court. Most cases to the Supreme Court are writ of certiorari petitions from losing parties and the court review the most significant cases. Most decisions by the Supreme Court are precedents interpretation of law by the state and federal courts, and must follow. Cases for hearing by the Supreme Court must be within the federal courts jurisdiction or involve issues in federal law (Unah, 2010).
If the case meets its jurisdiction and is to be heard, the first step is filing of suit in local court or federal court. Trial judges hear the evidence and make consideration for the legal arguments presented by each side. The trial judge then makes the decision. If part of the case or all of the case is decided against one side, they can then make an appeal to a higher court. After appealing as far as possible, the final appeal is made to the Supreme Court (Schwartz, 1997).
…show more content…
The document provides the history of the case, basic facts of the case as well as important legal issues presented in the case. The opponent side also files a response. Other interested parties also file briefs either supporting or opposing the petition. The file goes to the Supreme Court clerks, for review. The clerks summarize the documents for the Supreme Court justices. They also make a recommendation on whether the case should be taken for hearing by the Supreme Court. Lastly, the Supreme Court justices must make the final decision. At least four of the nine Supreme Court Justices must agree on granting the Petition for Certiorari. When the case is accepted, a "writ of certiorari’ is then issued (Schwartz,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is the highest court in the state and they review the decisions that were made in civil and criminal cases and they rule on all the death sentence…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A precedent is a former case that might have some of the same issues that the judge can use to help solve the present case by being informed of how the former judge interpreted the constitution. 2) This model gives the Supreme Court justices the right to deal any hand they want. They can make a case go either way with their choosing. Some Supreme Court justices might differ completely on a decision from one another on the same case but it is completely legal.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest federal court in America. The court consists of The Chief Justice of the U.S. with eight associate judges all nominated by the President of the U.S. They evaluate laws according to and try cases pertaining to the Constitution. The hierarchy under the U.S. Supreme Court is Appellate Courts, Trial Courts, and Federal Courts and boards outside of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court rules whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States Supreme Court gains its power from the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court has the power to review the actions from the executive and legislative branches and declare laws unconstitutionally; this power is known as Judicial Review. The Judicial Review also challenges the lawfulness decisions from public authorities. The goal was to accomplish new developments under the leadership of Chief justice, they believed that judges should find and apply an existing law, and not creating a new one. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison case was the first Supreme Court decision to strike down an act of Congress as unconstitutional.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to The Federalist Paper, the problem of enforcing the decisions by the court has been a headache because they have no soldiers or money to enforce their decrees. He argued that the court represents the will of the people by striking down decrees that politicians make in their own personal interest. The courts "pivotal" position on controversial dilemmas is a problem for democracy as the wrong interpretation may be made at the end of the day. The president, who has the power to appoint the judges, may appoint judges that favor his opinions. The supreme courts Attitudinal Model suggest that most decisions are based on sincere ideology values of the judges and not on factual stimuli presented by that particular case.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    he Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court within the hierarchy of the country’s federal courts. The Court was established in accordance to Article III of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court consists of nine total members, all of whom are nominated by the President at the time, and approved by the Senate. All nine members of the Supreme Court serve their term for life, only leaving when they retire, resign, or are impeached.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until the latter part of the twentieth century, most nominations almost involved exclusively the White House and the Senate. Public controversy over nominees rarely existed and the debate included a small number of insiders. The process of nominating Supreme Court justices manifested the cooperation of the three branches of American national government. The Constitution provides for presidential appointment power over “judges of the Supreme Court” with the “Advice and Consent” of the…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Influence

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Court has a lot of power when it comes to checks and balances since they can declare laws unconstitutional. They also grant a writ of certiorari to courts when they want lower court to send them a case for review, which has quite a few steps to it including four justices agreeing to hear the case. Despite the powers of the Supreme Court though, they can also be influenced by stare decisis and judicial activism. These influences can be good or bad, depending on the situation. It could benefit the current cases the justices deal with, but it could also hurt the case as it could go against the case and make the justices rule against it.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judicial branch specializes in hearing cases and interprets the law, and if a citizen is not satisfied with the outcome you can…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Branch

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The majority of the cases that the supreme court deals with are typically appealed from lower courts. The people that disagree with the lower court’s decision have to request for the supreme court to hear their case. The supreme court is by no means required to accept this offer unless the case is of something very great importance. Normally the court agrees to handle about 100 of the 7,000 cases every single year. The person requesting for the court to review their case is required to write a summary, known as a brief, about their issue.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court has the lawful authority provided Article III of the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court and “authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system’s present form, 94 district level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.” This means that regardless of status of status, the Supreme Court has the final decision. The Plethora of Court…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The federal judges are nominated by the President of the United States, and approved but the United States Senate. With having the definitive authority in the courts, the judge is the only one who can set bail, instruct jurors about the meaning of the law, and impose sentences. With a plea of guilty, it is the quickest way to resolve a heavy caseload for not only the judge, but also the prosecutors and defense…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They use judicial review to determine if a court case’s law or actions contradicted the constitutional. Through the review of all the facts and information in each case as well the decision of that they can tell if that case goes with the constitution or against the constitution. Some may think one case is with the constitution while another case of similar fashion is unconstitutional. That is because the justices have different minds and also have their own opinions of each case that they see. When they have decided that a case is unconstitutional then there will be steps and procedures that will get that case repealed and another decision be made about that case.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays