Principles Of Canada's Justice System

Decent Essays
A trial gives the prosecution and the defence an equal opportunity to present their evidence. The judge decides whether the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of any or all of the charges. A basic principle of Canada's justice system is that the accused is innocent until proven guilty.
The trial begins with the prosecutor presenting the evidence against the accused. This is done by calling witnesses and introducing materials as evidence to support the charges. Each witness called for the Crown is asked questions by the Crown attorney. This is called direct examination or examination-in-chief. The defence is then given an opportunity to question the prosecutor's witness and present evidence favouring the accused.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Landmark Case of Bedford v. Canada Henceforth, the case of Bedford v. Canada is used to shows the legal right of safety in the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms is violated due to criminalization of acts related to prostitution. The applicants of the case were former prostitutes who wished to establish prostitution as an indoor business. Furthermore, they challenged the provisions which were the criminalized aspects of prostitution.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Canadian Justice System

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to the Canadian Criminal Justice System, we ask many questions such as, “what is justice?”and “are equity and the rights of the accused being compromised in the name of efficiency?” Justice is when a person receives fairness and their moral rightness from the legal system which is decided by attorney 's, judges, legislatures, and by society. Based on this definition of justice, we wonder if equity and the rights of the accused is being compromised by the legal system. Many people may think that the Canadian Criminal Justice System may be unfair and not seek justice for those who deserve it, others may argue against that and believe that the Canadian Criminal Justice System shows equity and the rights of the accused. Sometimes…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In addition, the counsel for the Prosecution requested own witness to testify in order to give more evidence to the jury. On the one hand, the prosecutor used a strategic language to obtain certain answer to convince the jury, the witness was not under any pressure to respond to the persecutors' questions. This is a direct examination, which known as examination -in-chief. On the other hand , the prosecutor called the other side of the case for a purpose of examining the witness in a challenging way; unfriendly, in order to extract certain fact to convince the jury. This is known as cross-examination , to disapprove the certification which demonstrate by the opposition.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is the government's obligation to prove the respondent perpetrated the offense as specified in the arraignment. If the respondent decides not to testify or does not put on any evidence, the jury may not consider this as evidence the respondent committed the crime and is guilty merely because they did not put on a defense; the decision to put on a defense is solely up to the respondent and the defense counsel. Though, the defense will typically present its own account of the case. (United States Attorneys,…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years throughout history, much debate and controversy has been sparked with respect to Canada’s correctional system and criminal justice system. Canada’s criminal justice system has thrived/strived to work as a consolidated unified entity aimed at reducing, maintaining, and preventing crime and criminal activity. However, great controversy remains as to whether or not Canada’s criminal justice system is effective. It can be argued, for example, that Canada’s system of criminal justice is aimed at striving to achieve and meet specified goals, entities, or principles. In terms of sentencing a criminal offender, for example, sentencing can either be based on the principles of crime control or due process.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first part of the trail, the jury determines the guilt of the defendant. And in the second part, after the defendant has been convicted, additional evidence can be an be introduced relevant to the punishment appropriate for the…

    • 2582 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Injustice In Canada

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Recently in the canadian news there was a horrific incident involving the Prime Minister (Trudeau) and a crowd of people in parliament with whom he was unable to share space-time. The horrified victim, one Brousseau, was unable to complete the vote as assigned, yet was not subject to any disciplinary action. It is unclear whether this minister will ever be able to return to work as the very presence of the PM might cause them to feel harassed. None-the-less, he has apologized!…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Canadian court system the person who is accused is innocent until proven otherwise. It is the officers job to be a detective and gather evidence to put forth for court and it is up to the judge to make the decision. In this particular case the lack of evidence was apparent therefore leading the accused to be dismissed of the alleged charge.…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The contemporary justice system consists of three primary components. The first, are the law enforcement agencies, which are responsible for investigating crimes that have occurred and arresting individuals that are believed to have committed these crimes. The second, is the court system, which is responsible for prosecuting individuals, sentencing the guilty, and acquitting the innocent. The last component of the criminal justice system is the correctional system, which incapacitates convicted criminals and attempts to rehabilitate them back into society upon their release.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To treat the disease of crime we have Law. Criminal law is prominent law that prohibits certain kinds of conduct and imposes penalties for unlawful behavior. The criminal law is a means by which society reaffirms its values and punishes the violators. The Canadian justice system recognizes these values and differentiates that youth crime and adult crime need to be dealt differently. Maturity is the factor in making choices and being able to foresee the probable consequences of the actions.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Claiming compensation for dental negligence If you have been injured due to the negligence of a dentist, you may be able to claim compensation for dental negligence. Dental negligence compensation claims can only be made if people have received substandard dental treatment which has directly led to some form of injury. Not all injuries acquired at the dentist are due to a healthcare worker's negligence, and not all cases of negligence lead to injury. Examples of dental negligence claims Dentist negligence claims generally come under one of two categories. These are: - Substandard technique when conducting dental work - Failing to diagnose or treat health problems promptly…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In court the defendant starts out as innocent and stays innocent until the prosecutor presents enough evidence that overcomes his innocence without a reasonable doubt that they are guilty. So this means it’s up to the government to prove that he or she is guilty. The prosecutor has to look at the definitions of each crime committed and have proof for every element of each offense. In other words the prosecution has the burden of proof, while the defense has the burden to prove that the prosecutor does not establish guilt of the defendant to the jury or judge. Roles in a court room is different for each one involved.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Process

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The evidence submitted which is collected by police and the prosecution working in line together is examined in order to come to a decision on the accused guilt or lack thereof. Trials occur more often in cases of more serious offenses particularly violent ones.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondly, the protection of innocent is guaranteed through the justice system in Canada. One of the fundamental principles of the justice system (section 11) is “to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to the law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal.” So, when a person is arrested or taken into custody, the person is not necessarily guilty, until the court can prove it with strong evidence. In the first place, the innocent are treated fairly is through the legal rights that are guaranteed by Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This includes the right to remain silent, right to a lawyer and retain counsel, right to know the reason for the arrest, right to contact a parent and have parents with you during questioning.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment 5.3: Role of Investigator Introduction Investigators have an immense role in the criminal justice system. They have to ensure they follow due process, as well as, keeping the integrity of the evidence to prove continuity when entered into court. In the QB trial video, R v. Perry and Manitoba (2016), the investigating officer, Constable York, seized four exhibits: a wallet, a Timex watch, a kitchen knife, and a gun replica, which entered into court as physical evidence. Constable York also testified as a key witness, who then had to undergo a cross-examination by the defence counsel.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays