Popular Sovereignty: A Major Cause Of The Civil War

Improved Essays
The Civil War is a prime example of how conflict and compromise among individuals and governments can sometimes have negative consequences for a nation. The biggest conflict causing the Civil War was popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty is a law saying that the people living in a territory should be free of federal interference in determining their issues, mostly with slavery. Popular sovereignty is a major cause of the Civil War because it caused the bloodshed of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and caused more of a crisis in the Compromise of 1850. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was drafted by Stephen A. Douglas, established two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska, and let the citizens there decide the question of slavery. Controversy sprouted mostly

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    One event that contributed the Civil war was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This allowed for new territories to decide if they were a slave state or a free state by a popular vote. This act undid the Missouri Compromise and started the disagreement between the pro/anti-slavery groups. The effect of this was fighting and violence that became known as Bleeding Kansas and this had troubled the nation. The Missouri compromise had kept the Union from falling apart which is why it eventually led to the Civil war.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bleeding America The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The major impact of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was that it brought the US closer to a civil war and ended the Missouri compromise. The effect of the Missouri Compromise was to keep the political balance between both slave states and free states by putting them into the union in pairs. It also brought the U.S. closer because it brought the question of slavery back up in states and areas where the issue and place of slavery had already been decided before. Kansas and Nebraska were supposed to be territories that are free from slavery. Meaning that slavery was not allowed in these places.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main political purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to preserve the union. The unity of the United States has also been in danger because of the geographic divide created by slavery, and this act was created to make sure the southern states would not split. Rather than only creating Nebraska (which would most likely be a free state and throw off the balance of free versus slave states), the act was passed which created Kansas, which would most likely become a slave state. Had Kansas not been created the southern states would have gotten mad, and possibly split from the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act was signed, Stephen Douglas offered popular sovereignty, making people decide whether to have their territory slave free or not. This act terminated the Missouri Compromise. In addition, to this in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act has been called the most significant law ever enacted by the Congress of the United States. It was called the most significant law ever enacted because it allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The law had three major features, which were a larger territory of Nebraska was dissected into two smaller territories, Kanas and Nebraska, the dissolution of the Missouri compromise, and the new territories would determine its slavery status based on popular sovereignty. When the new law went into effect pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to Kansas, each side hoping to determine the results of the first election. Instead…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was devised as a compromise over slavery in 1854, as the nation was beginning to be torn apart in the decade before the Civil War. In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act created territories for both Kansas and Nebraska. This gave a chance for people to move slavery to the Midwest.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe the Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery, state’s rights, and also the power to control the West. What ultimately caused the Civil War would be the Compromise of 1850. Other main factors that caused the Civil War would be John Brown’s raid, the Second Great Awakening, and also the involvement of women in the Abolitionist movement. The reason as to why the Compromise of 1850 was the main cause of the Civil War would be due to the fact that it increased sectionalism, did not solve the issue of slavery, and also paved the way for the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1850. The reason why these events are the most significant are that they are the most pivotal events to occur during this time, which ultimately paved the way for the first…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One event that lead to the civil war was the compromise of 1850. The compromise of 1850 was a set of laws dealing with the issue of slavery. The compromise established that California would enter the…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is an important aspect of American history; it has shaped our country into what it is today. The civil war took place from 1861-1865. Without slavery, the civil war would not have occurred. Slavery divided the north and south, the differing opinions on things especially slavery is what led to the American civil war. The south expressed how slavery was beneficial for the whole nation because everyone depended on the southern economy and slavery was key to the prosperity of our nation.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays