Political Disputes Between 1776 And 1860

Improved Essays
Nick Rubin
Gaul
U.S. History
30 January 2015

After the signing of the constitution, it is evident that the Northern and Southern halves of the United States developed along different lines. The South remained predominantly agrarian with an explosion in cotton production, while the North became more and more industrialized. Different social cultures and political beliefs developed. This led to disagreements on many issues, like tariffs, taxes, and states rights, but when vast new tracts of land were added after the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican Cession, the expansion of slavery was the burning issue that led to the disruption of the union. Between 1776 and 1860, territorial compromises and political negotiations helped preserve unity: the Missouri compromise in
…show more content…
However, when the Dred Scott case declared them unconstitutional, tensions between the North and the South exploded, resulting in a full-blown Civil War once Abraham Lincoln was elected president. Between 1820 and 1854, Congress enacted three compromises to settle the disputes over slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 proposed to regulate slavery in the western territories by clearly defining free and slave territories. In order to maintain a balance of power in the Senate between slave and free states, the act prohibited slavery in new states of the Louisiana Purchase territory North of the 36 30 parallel. It also admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free one. After America’s 1848 victory in the Mexican-American war, the Mexican Cession left them with a huge tract of land, consisting of the present day states of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico. With this new land, the issue of the expansion

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Representative James Tallmadge even tried to propose an amendment which would essentially end slavery, during the time the Missouri request but the effort was defeated. The debate whether Missouri should be a slave or free state occurred for over a year. Northerners argued that Congress than had the power to prohibit slavery while the Southerners said they should have the freedom to choose whether the state should be slave or not. Though after a lot of debate they were soon able to come up with a compromise. The first part of the compromise was Missouri was admitted as a slave state while Maine was a free state.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luckily, the Civil War was delayed due to various settlements between political parties regarding slavery- such as the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was proposed by Representative Henry Clay from Kentucky. Clay came up with this after Missouri demanded to become a state, which would have upset the existing balance among free and slave states. The compromise resulted in Missouri admitted as a slave state and Maine carved out of Massachusetts as a free state.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arlin Quiroz Nov. 7th, 2017 HISTORY 1301 ONLINE The Compromise of 1850 The Compromise of 1850 consisted of several bills that were passed by the United Stated of America Congress in the year of 1850 around the month of September. The compromise of 1850 consisted of laws that made California a free state. The North States and the South States wanted to find a compromise to have the balance and the Free states and the slaves.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A). Although the Compromise of 1850, devised by Henry Clay, seemed to satisfy the states, it allowed slavery to exist above the 36’30’ line which had previously been defined by the Missouri Compromise in 1820. With Popular Sovereignty being one of the Compromise of 1850’s main focuses, states north of the 36’30’ line could now be admitted as slave states shall they choose to do so. Although the Compromise of 1850 seemed to…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise of 1850 The “Compromise of 1850” was a resolution constructed by Henry Clay in an attempt to appease both Northerners and Southerners, in regards to if the new territorial expansions acquired from the war with Mexico and subsequent “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” in 1848, should allow slavery. The compromise allowed California to be a free state and gave New Mexico and Utah the policy of “Popular Sovereignty” or the ability for the people of the state to decide on slavery. Texas was given relief on 10 millions dollars worth of debt in the compromise for the re-allotment of a portion of it 's land to New Mexico. The compromise also outlawed slavery in Washington DC, as the spectacle was a national embarrassment.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This dispute led to secession and the secession ultimately led to war, in which the Northern states and territories fought to preserve the Union, and the South fought to establish Southern independence as a new confederation of states under its own constitution. Dred Scott was a slave who sought citizenship through the American Legal System, and whose case eventually ended up in the Supreme Court. Scott was denied his request, stating that no person with African blood could become a U.S. citizen. Besides just denying citizenship for African Americans, it also overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had restricted slavery in certain U.S. territories.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The period after the War of 1812 was christened the Era of Good Feelings because of the nationalistic spirit, high morale, and unfamiliar cooperation among politicians that flourished during the time. Following the War of 1812, the Democratic-Republicans established an essentially one-party system, embracing some of the policies of the inactive Federalist Party and thereby eliminating hostility between the two parties. Although there was a rising spirit of nationalism and morale, the Era of Good Feelings was also marked by sectionalism, divisions within the Democratic-Republican Party, and strife over tariffs, the national bank, and internal improvements. The growing sectionalism can be attributed to both the friction between the North and…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the majority of American History leading up to the Civil War, civilians had been divided over the issue of slavery and politics. The nation had a long history of compromise that seemed necessary to keep the nation unified. Most of these compromises avoided the issue of slavery, as politicians and “great compromisers” like Henry Clay aimed to prevent the inevitable split between the North and South. There was a turning point, however, in the North and South, when compromise was no longer an option. Although the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the immediate and final trigger for southern secession, other attributes including the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 drove the South further towards…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the 1850s, slavery, and other political issues between the states, became a sizable issue. Slavery began to dissect people. For example, the Northerners began to begin support free soil and abolition. However, the Southerners disagreed, and tension increased dramatically. Soon, the Southern slaveowners felt that their rights were no longer being illustrated, and felt that they must succeed (secession is the act of withdrawing from an organization, union, military alliance or especially a political entity, to be protected from Northern abuse.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    John Brown Abolition Movement

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    John Brown devised a plan to incite a slave rebellion in the Appalachian Mountains, arming slaves as they were freed and pushing on to free more men, the army of former slaves growing drastically as it rolled along (Stoddard and Murphy, 15). Slave rebellions had failed miserably in the past, but Brown's idea of properly arming the slaves gave some abolitionists the idea that it could work. On October 16, 1859, John Brown led a group of twenty-two men into Harper's Ferry, West Virginia, to secure weapons from the federal armory stationed in the small town nestled between the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers (Stoddard and Murphy, 15). The weapons stored in the armory would be more than enough to kick off Brown's envisioned revolution. Events did not unfold as the men had hoped, and they were soon surrounded by townspeople and fired upon, with marines (led, ironically, by then Colonel Robert E. Lee) arriving by the following afternoon (Stoddard and Murphy, 15).…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 stated that the North would get California as a free state, while the South would get a stronger slave law and the states of New Mexico and Utah that could be free or slave states. Next came the Kansas-Nebraska Conflict in 1854, which was a very controversial conflict. Nebraska is too northern to become a slave state, so instead the conflict shifted to Kansas giving it the nickname “bleeding Kansas.” This conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery grew to the point that Kansas was not admitted as a state until the late 1860s. All of this conflict brought about one common theme,…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays