Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

Great Essays
Plea bargaining is one of the most important factors of our criminal justice system. About 95 percent of criminal cases result in a plea deal. What is a plea bargain one may ask? A plea bargain is a type of legal contract between the defendant and the prosecuting attorney of the defendant’s case. It provides a leniency in a sentence or lesser chargers for the defendant if he pleads guilty to his case. At what phase of the criminal justice system does plea bargaining begin and end? Plea bargaining occurs at any stage of the criminal justice system. From the moment you get arrested until right before the verdict of the case. In this paper, you will learn how the role of plea bargaining is present in enforcement, adjudication, and our correctional system.

The criminal justice system involves three parts: enforcement, adjudication, and the correctional system. Plea bargaining exists in every phase of the criminal justice system. Enforcement includes being arrested and in jail temporarily until the disposition of their case. Adjudication includes the trial process and a conviction of the case. The correctional system involves jail, prison, probation, etc. When a defendant pleads guilty, the defendant waive all their trial rights. These rights
…show more content…
A prior arrest without adjudication cannot be used against the defendant in court let alone in plea bargaining. From the perspective of law enforcement, if you are guilty, you will take plea bargain. They do not realize that the innocent plead guilty too because of their tactics to get suspects to confess. Why would someone who is truly innocent plead guilty to a crime they did not commit? Plea bargaining play a role in enforcement when the defendant has either a prior arrest history or none previously at all. Every situation and circumstance is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Review: In 1975, Attorney General, Avrum Gross, declared a prohibition on plea-bargaining in Alaska. Michael Rubinstein and Teresa J. White from National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice were assigned to study the impact of Gross’s decision. Their first task was looking at whether the policy had been carried out by the courts in Alaska, and second, was what the effects were on Alaska’s criminal justice system. This involved conducting 400 interviews of the surrounding judges in Alaska and collecting information from 3,586 case files. Overall their goal was to create a detailed description of the Alaska system during the “before and after” years.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Examines the offender’s background to provide the sentencing judge with facts needed to make an informed sentencing decision. It also involves a dispute-settlement process during which the probation officer works with the defendant and the victim to resolve the complaint before sentencing (Schmalleger, 2015). In the Coatesville Fire Case, the offenders the prosecuting attorney would look at the evidence, testimony of eyewitnesses, and the confessions of the suspects to provide the sentencing judge with the facts to decide on the case. Determines whether the case should be referred for formal court proceedings or held open for adjustment services (Schmalleger, 2015).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this research paper, an overview of what plea bargaining is, its incentives, and its disadvantages will be discussed in order to show that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, as well as…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The plea bargaining process is a negotiation between two parties to give information for a lessened sentence. A prosecutor will offer the defendant either a lessened sentence, dropped charge, or recommend a certain charge to the judge. In return, the defendant either pleads guilty or no contest. Plea bargaining is used often because people want to spend less time for their crime. With DNA and all the new ways to get evidence, there is a good chance of proving someone did the crime.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A plea bargain is when the defendant in a criminal trial agrees to plead guilty in the exchange of a lesser sentence or to have other charges dropped. In theory, a plea bargain is a way to speed up the courtroom process. When applied correctly plea bargains are excellent tools within the criminal justice system. Incorrectly used judgment is cast down from those outside of the criminal justice system.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    two feet, gain their self-esteem, and regain their relationship with their children and family members (Kaye, 2004). Another problem-solving courts with successful results include domestic violence courts. Domestic violence cases arose in the 1900s and it was evident that not enough was being done in order to protect the victims. Problem-solving courts allow for one judge to overview the case from the beginning to the end.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages

    You succinctly described how the Plea and Plea Bargaining phase is an important but controversial part of the Juvenile Court Process. As you noted through your law enforcement experience, many see plea bargaining as a miscarriage of justice. While it does bring an otherwise weak case to some type of closure therefore ultimately saving the time of the court and money for the tax papers, it does not truly bring justice for the victim(s) or the community. “Counterarguments hold that plea bargaining with juveniles is an unregulated and unethical process” (Siegel & Welsh, 2014, p. 360). This is one of the many gray areas that the juvenile court system has as apposed to the adult system.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When less severe crimes receive the same or similarly harsh punishments as more serious or felonious crimes it creates an inequality within the courtroom. Removing plea bargaining would show results similar to the case from 1975 in Alaska where the Attorney General forbade prosecutors from plea bargaining with offenders. The results from this occurrence showed that the punishments for violent and felonious crimes did not change, but the punishments for less serious offenses and misdemeanors where dramatically increased (Rubinstein & White, 1978). The inequality created from the removal of plea bargaining would have drastic effects on the criminal justice system where the punishment for less serious crimes would be severely punishable but would have little to no effect on felonies and crimes of a violent nature. In the case from Alaska the primary objective was to hinder plea bargaining for the more serious offenders yet the outcome would eliminate the discretionary decision making of the courts and would lead to first time offenders of smaller crimes receiving unequal punishments for their crimes and reduced probability for parole (Rubinstein & White, 1978).…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Then you have the judge who oversees the process and that the offender gets a fair trial, that any plea agreements are fair for the offender, and then the judge sentences the offender if found…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overrepresentation of Minorities in the Criminal Justice System Today's criminal justice system is faced with many issues among the racial and ethnic lines. In 2001, the National Urban League conducted a survey that asked 800 African Americans if they felt that the criminal justice system was fair or if they felt the system was biased towards African Americans. 74 percent of them felt that the system was biased while 15 percent said it was fair(Delone, Spohn, & Walker, 2011, p.2).…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Plea Bargaining

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea bargains can have certain benefits even if they restrict some rights. When the defendant pleads guilty their punishment is in the hands of the…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Criminal prosecutions in the United States do not tend to end with jury trials, but with plea bargains instead. These plea bargains occur between the defendant and prosecutors for the defendant to plead guilty to charges filed against them. (Cornell University Law School) If the defendant agrees, the prosecutor tends to reduce the severity of the punishment, or lessen the sentence of the charge. However, it is natural for a prosecutor and defendant to enlist the help of the judge in the plea bargain.…

    • 2209 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays