Plea Bargaining Advantages

Improved Essays
Plea bargaining is an agreement made between the prosecution and the defense that allows the defendant to receive a lesser charge for their crimes if they plead guilty. The prosecution often offers the defendant a reduced sentence. Most of the time, “the defendant agrees to plead guilty in order to avoid a trial and a more severe sentence” (Rennison and Dodge 204). When the defendant agrees to a plea bargain they agree to give up some of their constitutional rights including, the right to a jury and the right to appeal their case. In the American legal system, plea bargaining is very popular and is used to resolve around 90% of criminal cases (Plea Bargains: In Depth). The Rennison and Dodge textbook stated, “In 2006, 94% of felony criminal offenders pleaded guilty and were sentenced by a judge” (Rennison and Dodge 204). There are many benefits that the use of plea bargaining brings to the …show more content…
With plea bargaining, the defendants pleads guilty and admits to the charges that they were accused of. This removes the uncertainty of a trial because there is no question about whether or not the defendant committed the crime. The defendant may receive a lesser sentence, however, they are still admitting to and being punished for the crimes they did commit. A defendant is likely to accept the plea bargain in order to avoid going to trial and having more evidence revealed that would result in them receiving harsher charges and sentencing. Plea bargaining would also benefit the prosecutor in this case because is their argument is weak or they are lacking evidence the defendant is still likely to be found guilty. With a jury trial, the defendant could be acquitted even if they were guilty if the prosecutors does not have enough evidence or witnesses. However, with the plea bargaining, the defendant can still plead and be found guilty, and be charged for their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Defense counsels started to feel that defendants will not be able to pay for the time involved to go to trial, but the prosecutors feel even though they work harder at a trial they are not having to decide on a sentence in a plea bargain. The judges now have the burden to determine and announce all sentences to defendants. The ban on plea bargaining did not affect the sentences of violent crime charges, but it did drastically change the sentences of Felony 3 guilty outcomes. The defendants convicted of burglary, larceny and destruction of property found themselves receiving longer sentences.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many take the plea to get lower sentences. The defendants may have to live in prison and suffer from the label of felon. With the overwhelming caseloads, public defender do not have time to work thoroughly on the cases (Siegel, Schmalleger, and Worrall, 2017, p. 243). Public defenders should get more support staff to help in preparation of cases even though…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this research paper, an overview of what plea bargaining is, its incentives, and its disadvantages will be discussed in order to show that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, as well as…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining most often takes place before the beginning of a trial. It is the process by which the defendant and the prosecution work out a conclusion to the case, subject to court approval. For the prosecutor, the purpose of plea bargaining is to ensure a defendant gets punishment. For the defense, it is a way to get a lesser charge than if the case were to go to…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plea Bargain Advantages

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A plea bargain is when the defendant in a criminal trial agrees to plead guilty in the exchange of a lesser sentence or to have other charges dropped. In theory, a plea bargain is a way to speed up the courtroom process. When applied correctly plea bargains are excellent tools within the criminal justice system. Incorrectly used judgment is cast down from those outside of the criminal justice system.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Making it much harder for a guilty plea to be tossed. This also brings into question his or her creditability, changing your statement after some time to think about it may seem odd to some. Changing a plea is easier done by the defendant, if he or she has favorable evidence against the prosecutors case. This evidence may be the lack of creditability the prosecutors main witness, DNA evidence or something that can confirm his or her…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea bargaining is a widely used tool to wrap up cases quickly and efficiently. However, there is going to be no plea bargaining in a case when a defendant is not rewarded for pleading guilty. There is no incentive in pleading guilty when you are going to receive a sizeable prison sentence regardless of whether you admit to committing the crime or not. Trials are costly procedures and it would save the Canadian taxpayers a substantial amount of money if the trial could be averted. Mandatory minimum sentencing instead plays a direct role in expanding the number of cases that will go to trial (Frost, 2006).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being in law enforcement for several years I come across several suspects and defendants who expresses the criminal justice process moves like a snail and is always unpredictable. Imagine if a significant amount of cases was going to trial instead of over 90% of felony cases are plea bargained (Bohm, R., Haley, K.,n.d). Nevertheless, there are three types of plea bargains and prosecutors tend to have factors to decide if the plea bargain is in the best interest or what’s the better plea bargain to make depending on the situation. The first example, a defendant might plead guilty to trespass and a misdemeanor vandalism charge instead of burglary charge because burglary carries felony charges.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the role of the prosecutor in the plea bargaining process? The role of the prosecutor in a Plea-bargaining process is to get the defendant to come to an agreement to where the defendant pleads guilty to some or many of the charges filed against them therefore bypassing a costly trial preceding. The prosecutor usually offers a reduced punishment if the defendants agrees to their terms. In some jurisdictions prosecutors and the defendant can work with the judges to help them determine what the sentence they will get if they accept the plea bargain. As prosecutor, what would you recommend in an attempt to resolve the case and why?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around 95 percent of cases are plea bargained. Without plea bargaining, the court system would be drowning in cases and the right to a speedy trial under the 6th amendment would be virtually impossible. The court system in the United States is already overloaded with cases waiting to be heard, and the added cases resulting in the elimination of plea bargaining would be catastrophic for the criminal justice system. What plea bargaining does is allow the prosecutor to offer a lesser charge and, in turn, the defendant waives their right to a trial. It allows the court system to move along faster and deal with the offenders who commit more serious, heinous crimes.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When less severe crimes receive the same or similarly harsh punishments as more serious or felonious crimes it creates an inequality within the courtroom. Removing plea bargaining would show results similar to the case from 1975 in Alaska where the Attorney General forbade prosecutors from plea bargaining with offenders. The results from this occurrence showed that the punishments for violent and felonious crimes did not change, but the punishments for less serious offenses and misdemeanors where dramatically increased (Rubinstein & White, 1978). The inequality created from the removal of plea bargaining would have drastic effects on the criminal justice system where the punishment for less serious crimes would be severely punishable but would have little to no effect on felonies and crimes of a violent nature. In the case from Alaska the primary objective was to hinder plea bargaining for the more serious offenders yet the outcome would eliminate the discretionary decision making of the courts and would lead to first time offenders of smaller crimes receiving unequal punishments for their crimes and reduced probability for parole (Rubinstein & White, 1978).…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The District Attorney has discretionary power to decide the disposition of cases. One of the primary ways that the District Attorney uses its’ discretion is in how he processes plea-bargaining. The District Attorney may reduce a defendants’ exposure to a crime if he provides some pieces of information that he needs to prosecute a bigger player in the narcotics trade. It has been said that the administration of justice is a selective process in which only those cases that will not overload the system will ultimately be prosecuted (Cole, 1970)…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays