Euthyphro's Argument Essay

Improved Essays
In Plato’s first dialog Euthyphro, there are two characters introduced, Socrates and Euthyphro. The two of them have a discussion about what brought them to the king-archon’s court. The discussion leads to an argument between the two about what piety is. The Euthyphro dialog illustrates to the reader what brought them there, the true philosophical dilemma for Euthyphro, and the false dilemma for Socrates that relates to arguments employed later by Socrates in Plato 's apology dialog. In the beginning of Euthyphro, Euthyphro first asks Socrates why he has come to the king archon’s court (Euthyphro). Socrates then tells him a man named Meletus has charged him for corrupting the youth (Euthyphro 2B). This curiosity is shared by Socrates who …show more content…
Socrates just simply asks Euthyphro a series of questions to see if Euthyphro had an exact definition to what piety was. The real dilemma for Euthyphro is when Socrates asks him to consider “Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods” (Euthyphro 10A). This is confusing to Euthyphro because Socrates uses a tautology way of reasoning, which ends up causing Socrates’ false dilemma. When reading the dialect one can see him using tautology when Socrates tells Euthyphro, “Now if you will, do not hide things from me but tell me again from the beginning what piety is” (Euthyphro 11B). Euthyphro’s dilemma might have been caused by Socrates’ questions, but now he does not believe himself to be as wise as before Socrates and him had the argument over piety. Euthyphro was a highly intelligent sophist. This must have been why Socrates decided to have the argument to find the meaning of piety with him in the first place; instead a false dilemma had arisen for Socrates. He tried to find the definition of piety to better help his defense, but could not. If he had considered a third option that he wouldn’t have experienced a false dilemma and that Euthyphro wouldn’t had gotten somewhat upset with him since he felt they were going in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Pious Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It seeks that Socrates fully understands the meaning of what Euthyphro explication is when it comes to piety however he also comes to the understanding of the differences between each other as well as well as what they could mean. Those differences are the ones at which Socrates begins to contemplate into a disagreeing…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and if Euthyphro believes his impious actions will insult the gods (4E). Euthyphro believes his advanced wisdom on the meaning piety translates to know what the gods mean by the word too. Socrates needs him to explain the word to demonstrate his mastery of it. Euthyphro attempts to deliver a definition of piety. However, Socrates wants the essence of the word in order to demonstrate true mastery.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I argue that Euthyphro’s defense of his view that his father is guilty of murder is not cogent. I will first present the argument that Euthyphro’s claim against his father is mainly rooted in circumstantial beliefs that can easily be disputed. Secondly, I will prove that Euthyphro is too unreliable of a source for the cogency of his sole account to be convincing. And lastly, I will argue that Euthyphro’s main reason for prosecuting his father does not have to do with his own moral compass, but rather with his own pride and hunger for recognition.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth and Fifth of Euthyphro's Definitions to Piety In the fourth definition of Euthyphro in Plato's dialogue of “Euthyphro”, he describes piety is as a “servants show to their master” (Plato 71). meaning the one should follow the god's ways, like in a way in how a priest would follow the words of the gods in what could be good or evil. Furthermore, Euthyphro could be suggesting that attending to gods is piety (good), meaning doing things that would please the gods would be seeing as goods or just. While not attending to the gods would be seen as impiety to the gods, meaning doing things that the gods would not like would seeing as an evil deed.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Strategies of Plato vs. Aristophanes In Aristophanes’ “Clouds” and Plato’s “Apology” Socrates is satirically attacked and rationally defended respectively. The two argumentative styles of Aristophanes and Plato are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Aristophanes utilizes satire and humorous exaggerations of sophist teachings to denounce Socrates. Alternatively, Plato’s “Apology” uses logic and reason in order to defend himself against the charges brought against him.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato's Euthyphro, Socrates introduces a problem to Euthyphro asking whether “the pious [is] being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by gods” (Plato 12). One can better understand this concept by relating the Euthyphro Dilemma to the Divine Command Theory and examining the potential philosophical implications associated with the two while indicating their errors. The Divine Command Theory states that morality is “somehow dependent upon God” and that it “consists in obedience to God’s commands”. The Divine Command Theory also says that it’s basis is that it is “ultimately based on the commands or character of God” (Austin).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro makes the comment, regarding his families’ ill-temperaments towards him, “Which shows, Socrates, how little they know what the gods think about piety and impiety.” (Jowett, 1868, p. 3) In justification, Euthyphro claims he his act is just according to a higher, or divine, law, which is ironically, due opposite the position Anytus, Lycon and Meletus hold against Socrates. Enter now the unmatched wisdom and adroitness of Socrates, as detailed by Plato, whereby he [Socrates] challenges and pursues Euthyphro through logic and rhetorical…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is why he asks Euthyphro to define piety, so that he himself will have a measure for deciding what is religious and what is not, thus be able to defend himself in court. Euthyphro answers that what he is doing in prosecuting his father is religious, and he cites the precedent of Zeus punishing his own father (Cronos). Socrates then questions many of the stories about strife among the gods over the next few passages as Euthyphro continues to defend the gods. This questioning of the stories about the gods is what leads to his trial in the first place, that he questioned them and that because he was a teacher it caused the youth to question the gods. If you question the gods and the gods are pious, you are in turn acting with impiety.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Euthyphro’s definition of piety is the action/way that all the gods love. This means that the gods actions are not arbitrary or relative, rather they are deeply rooted in principles which are shared. The similarity I want to draw on is in Mill’s approach to higher pleasures where he believes that competent judges’ preferences are not as relative as they are principled, hence encompassing a deeper and higher value associated with higher pleasures that outweigh the pleasure amount argument. However, it’s important to realize that this justification takes the ideology further away from hedonism as it has now involved other higher senses and principles, which defeats the purpose of hedonism. Still, it does explain the dignity and value we as mortals attach to higher pleasures that are achieved by higher capacity exercises.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates starts to give his defense about Meletus’ first accusation. The first accusation is that Socrates was corrupting youth (Plato, Apology, p.234). Socrates responds to this accusation by asking Meletus questions. First Socrates asks Meletus again that did he corrupt the youth. Meletus agrees with that statement.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates claims to have no knowledge of these types of things, and concedes that if he has any knowledge at all it is of worthless or trivial things. He claims that his purpose for initiating interactions with these reputedly knowledgeable people is first and foremost to prove the oracle wrong, because he believes he really knows nothing. If he can successfully prove the oracle wrong by finding someone who is indeed wiser or more knowledgeable than him, then he will be presented with the opportunity to learn something worthwhile from the person he is engaging, which is his second purpose for these interactions. Unfortunately, this proves to be an unsuccessful method of learning for Socrates because he does not actually learn the fine and good things he has sought to learn; instead he has learned that the reputedly knowledgeable people are merely ignorant of their own ignorance. He determines that they are only truly capable of giving him examples of specific instances where actions seem to showcase the thing that he is seeking knowledge of—such the examples of piety that Euthyphro describes; he also discerns that they are incapable of giving him a definitive definition that is not easily shown to be a contradiction or fallacious in some other way.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Euthyphro Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Murder” means, in a legal context, the killing of a human being by a sane and human with malicious intent (precising). In order to truly understand the definition of murder, it must be broken down into the two key components, malice and sanity, that differentiate murder from lesser crimes. First of all, it is important that the perpetrator has malicious intent when killing the victim. If there isn’t any malice involved, the crime is not as severe and would instead be classified as involuntary manslaughter or a different, lesser crime than murder. “Malicious” means malevolent (synonymous).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Euthyphro, Socrates is being prosecuted for corrupting the youth and for impiety, while Euthyphro is being charged for murder. In conversations between the two, Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him “what is piety” (Euthyphro, pg.47). Socrates engages Euthyphro in a discussion that will help him find the meaning of piety and by doing so, Socrates can use this to defend himself against the charges he faces. In the Platonic dialogues, Plato’s defense of Socrates illustrates that Socrates is a political philosopher in question for the truth. It is important to understand that Plato and Aristophanes both had different representations of Socrates but because of the portrayal of Aristophanes’ Clouds, his play had a profound impact on Athenian society.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays