The purpose of this essay is for the Writer to examine and analyze methodology and legalities of ending one’s life options and ethical foundations surrounding the right to life targeting the following areas of concerns: 1) Physician Assisted- Suicide; and 2) Pro-life Proponent arguments.
Background
This writer understands the complexities of life as how many differences exist regarding physician- assisted suicide (PAS) as a state of suicide and pro–life choices that can be deemed by some as ethical suffering. Today, End of Life (EOL) does not have to be considered suicide or a war against pro-life when making competent choices such as advance directives, transitional services and or resources that could ease anxiety in decision-making choices …show more content…
Uniformed Services as a Biomedical Research Associate and a Military Health Educational Training Officer that Physician -Assistant Suicide is committed with the support of an additional person, occasionally a physician; however, it became the main attraction of public debate regarding its moral and ethical basis from a Christian and science perspective. Ray Anderson stated that “legal and ethical issues is that decision will be made on behalf of restrictions to assume authority over extending life and the right to commit suicide, while Christian theology cannot support suicide as an individual’s right to his or her life because it violates the fundamental co-responsibility for life which constitutes human personhood.” The writer finds it challenging in distinguishing the ethical and moral basis of suicide and that of physician -assisted suicide, in that, suicide is taking your own life and the latter is giving someone the permission to end your life. Lauris Kaldjian stated the “though human suffering at the end of life may at times be so overwhelming as to entertain the possibility of Physician, a Christian vision of human life outlined above invites the conclusion that PAS represent an inability to appreciate the fullness of God’s providence in situations where suffering is extreme”. This writer attests that witnessing the EOL of love ones in suffering is quite traumatic, in …show more content…
Rob Moll, stated, “Whatever the medical decisions made, and under any circumstance, we can express our faith in God, our love for one another, our hope in the resurrection, while having done this will have been faithful, in the eyes of the believer, God, and neighbor”. Yet, the writer states that it is a traumatic experience to witness counseling sessions that suggest to a female who was raped by a stranger and become impregnated to keep the baby and/or not abort. Well, the writer can say, that some Christians will say, “Thou Shall not Kill”. William Hathaway stated, “The pro-life-Christian, believing the abortion process results in the murder of a human person are individuals who operate on the basis of worldview assumptions that significantly deviates from reality, their moral faculties are functioning in a context for which they have not been designed”. Moreover, the writer has examined that Pro-Life Christians need to understand that no one is perfect, while Man can set up moral principles to judge one another based on personal opinion, realities but hate another due to the color of their skin could also be deemed an ethical state of affairs and bible said that we are to love our neighbors, in that, Mark 12:31 says, “The second is this, 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS
Background
This writer understands the complexities of life as how many differences exist regarding physician- assisted suicide (PAS) as a state of suicide and pro–life choices that can be deemed by some as ethical suffering. Today, End of Life (EOL) does not have to be considered suicide or a war against pro-life when making competent choices such as advance directives, transitional services and or resources that could ease anxiety in decision-making choices …show more content…
Uniformed Services as a Biomedical Research Associate and a Military Health Educational Training Officer that Physician -Assistant Suicide is committed with the support of an additional person, occasionally a physician; however, it became the main attraction of public debate regarding its moral and ethical basis from a Christian and science perspective. Ray Anderson stated that “legal and ethical issues is that decision will be made on behalf of restrictions to assume authority over extending life and the right to commit suicide, while Christian theology cannot support suicide as an individual’s right to his or her life because it violates the fundamental co-responsibility for life which constitutes human personhood.” The writer finds it challenging in distinguishing the ethical and moral basis of suicide and that of physician -assisted suicide, in that, suicide is taking your own life and the latter is giving someone the permission to end your life. Lauris Kaldjian stated the “though human suffering at the end of life may at times be so overwhelming as to entertain the possibility of Physician, a Christian vision of human life outlined above invites the conclusion that PAS represent an inability to appreciate the fullness of God’s providence in situations where suffering is extreme”. This writer attests that witnessing the EOL of love ones in suffering is quite traumatic, in …show more content…
Rob Moll, stated, “Whatever the medical decisions made, and under any circumstance, we can express our faith in God, our love for one another, our hope in the resurrection, while having done this will have been faithful, in the eyes of the believer, God, and neighbor”. Yet, the writer states that it is a traumatic experience to witness counseling sessions that suggest to a female who was raped by a stranger and become impregnated to keep the baby and/or not abort. Well, the writer can say, that some Christians will say, “Thou Shall not Kill”. William Hathaway stated, “The pro-life-Christian, believing the abortion process results in the murder of a human person are individuals who operate on the basis of worldview assumptions that significantly deviates from reality, their moral faculties are functioning in a context for which they have not been designed”. Moreover, the writer has examined that Pro-Life Christians need to understand that no one is perfect, while Man can set up moral principles to judge one another based on personal opinion, realities but hate another due to the color of their skin could also be deemed an ethical state of affairs and bible said that we are to love our neighbors, in that, Mark 12:31 says, “The second is this, 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS