Metaphysics In Plato's Allegory Of The Caves

In Plato’s allegory of the caves suggests that there are two things that separate the physical from the metaphysics. What’s deemed physical for example is what we can touch what is sensible to us and able to live. The physical is the realm of becoming. On the other hand, what’s prescribed to be metaphysics is something that is beyond physics. Metaphysical is simply is something you cannot touch. The aspect of metaphysic is what helps influence the essence of what’s physical. With these two concepts, they share an relationship from the essence of the forms. The forms are purely the perfected idea of a thing. For instance, the forms are anything something could ever become. For the metaphysical perspective forms is what influences and sets into essence to create the physical. And the physical is what the influence helped made it become. Plato then goes into the discussion of the cave. The prisoners in the cave were only receiving the metaphysics point of view because they couldn’t view the real thing. Once of the prisoner’s broke free he was able to experience the physical aspect of the shadows. Another example, can be viewed as what a chair can become. In the metaphysics view a chair can be whatever it ends up being. Its whatever has the same identity of becoming chariness. A chair can be a mat, sofa, stool, and table, but at the end what’s physical is what it eventually ends up becoming which is a chair. …show more content…
Outline each cause individually and what aspect of the example is involved with each individual cause (i.e. the marble is involved with what cause).Explain to me how this represented Aristotle’s idea of how nature functioned and changed. Then, related this to his idea of the Unmoved Mover. How did the Unmoved Mover function, and why was it