By banning certain books, libraries lose the integrity of offering a variety of stories for every type of person. In fact, some people make an attempt to read books that are provocative in nature, just because of how taboo it is to read them. The same applies to music, movies, and magazines. If a library refuses to provide a specified movie, song, or magazine, then they are preventing the public from broadening their minds. See, by gaining insight from controversial literature, one can learn from those who thought differently, and more easily establish a personal stance of morals and values, even if they don't reflect society or the public. It's vital to the expansion of the human condition, that we reflect on all points of view, not just the commonly agreed upon ones. Truthfully, removing controversial sources of knowledge from local libraries prevents society from learning from others and prevents us from expanding our
By banning certain books, libraries lose the integrity of offering a variety of stories for every type of person. In fact, some people make an attempt to read books that are provocative in nature, just because of how taboo it is to read them. The same applies to music, movies, and magazines. If a library refuses to provide a specified movie, song, or magazine, then they are preventing the public from broadening their minds. See, by gaining insight from controversial literature, one can learn from those who thought differently, and more easily establish a personal stance of morals and values, even if they don't reflect society or the public. It's vital to the expansion of the human condition, that we reflect on all points of view, not just the commonly agreed upon ones. Truthfully, removing controversial sources of knowledge from local libraries prevents society from learning from others and prevents us from expanding our