Persuasive Authority In Court Cases

Decent Essays
3. Persuasive Authority

• Persuasive authority means that a court may follow the opinion or reasoning of the “persuasive” case but it is not required. The decision to follow persuasive authority depends on the stature of the court deciding the earlier case, the reasoning of the opinion, the similarity to the instant case, and whether the current court agrees with the case.

• A federal circuit or district court decision on a question of federal law may or may not be persuasive to a state court considering the same issue.

• A decision of one circuit may or may not be persuasive to another.

• A state appellate court decision on a question of state law may or may not be persuasive to a federal court deciding the same issue.

• Dicta is not

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Virginia: The democratic governor Terry McAuliffe said he restored voting rights for 13,000 felons who completed their sentences. The court said that McAuliffe didn't have the authority to restore the rights then more than 206,000.The Republican said they will be watching very closely to make sure the governor didn't violate the courts rule. Wisconsin&Ohio:…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee case is a Supreme Court case from 1816 that challenged appellate jurisdiction over state court decisions, specifically, the ability of the Supreme Court to hear and decide state cases where state court’s decided cases based on federal law. A British loyalist, Lord Fairfax, owned land in Virginia during the Revolutionary War when Virginia seized the land and gave a tract of it to David Hunter. Following the war, the United States entered into a treaty with Great Britain guaranteeing protection of lands owned by British loyalists. Once Lord Fairfax died and his land ownership passed to his heir, Thomas Martin, he sought to recover the land and sued. The Virginia court ruled that Fairfax and Martin were the owners of the land but upon appeal to the state appellate court, it was reversed in favor of Hunter.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Marbury was a judge appointed to a circuit court by the second president John Adams. John Adams lost the election to Thomas Jefferson, and decided to make a few more appointments on his way out of office. (Kelly, 2014) The state secretary at that time was James Madison. He was the individual commissioning appointments but decided against the order once Thomas Jefferson took office.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stare decisis is the principle that past decisions made by the judicial system are applied to similar issues within the jurisdiction. In the case Griswold V. Connecticut the initial ruling was over turned by the Supreme Court, finding that Connecticut’s Laws on birth control were unconstitutional. The defendants were initially charged with accessories in the assistance of preventing conception. The Supreme Court reversed this ruling because married couples have the right to privacy, in which, they have the right to seek medical assistance to prevent conception. Roe V. Wade’s reversal was built on the precedent of Griswold V. Connecticut’s rights of privacy.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Essay South Dakota v. Dole The Twenty-first Amendment allowed states to regulate alcohol. In 1984, Congress enacted a withhold of funds to any state that did not raise their legal drinking age to 21 years of age. Many states, who didn't already have a 21-year-old minimun drinking age, fell in suit. Except for South Dakota, who had a 19-year-old minimun drinking age, who challenged the law.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Baker Vs Tennessee

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages

    According to the Tennessee State Constitution, Tennessee is required to redraw their legislative districts every ten years so that each district would have almost equal population. Charles Baker and other residents complained that since Tennessee had not redistricted for almost sixty years (1901), Shelby County had about ten times the amount of people as the rural district, decreasing the value of their votes. He argued by having this population difference, Tennessee could not uphold the “one person, one vote” requirement. Baker sued the Secretary of State for Tennessee, Joe Carr, for ignoring this Tennessee law. He claimed that this action violated the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Baker v Carr, the majority made up the basis for asserting jurisdiction because the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, did not give it the power to do so. The Constitution never mentioned anything regarding state election procedure, other than that it could not hinder any legal rights of its citizens as mentioned in the Constitution and that the number of representatives per state were to be determined by state population. Therefore, the Constitution never mentioned that federal courts had the jurisdiction to hear constitutional questions to regarding state elections; the majority simply made that up in order to hear the case. There is no branch of federal government that specializes in redistricting. Since representatives' political…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first article is written by Cyndy Caravelis, Ted Chiricos, and William Bales (2011) called “Static and Dynamic Indicators of Minority Treat in Sentencing Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis” and the second article is called “Sentencing with Discretion:Crack Cocaine Sentencing after Booker” by Ryan S. King and Marc Mauer in 2006. In addition, the last article is by Mona Lynch and Marisa Omori (2014) called “Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker: The Impact of Time and Place on Drug Trafficking Cases in Federal Court” from the Law and Society Review. Summary Caravelis, Chiricos, and Bales (2011) examines the “Habitual Offender” using a hierarchical generalized linear modeling to look at the direct effects of race using static…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The court can declare state regulations unconstitutional if deem to be unreasonable on interstate commerce. Federal preemption gives congress the power to regulate an entire field even if no conflict exists between state and federal…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the middle of the eighteenth century, the United States consisted of thirteen colonies ruled by British government. The northern colonies were founded by people who were religious and believed in strong work ethic whereas the southern colonies were Puritans who settled in New England to gain religious freedom from Britain while the first colonists of the southern colonies were Englishmen. The first settlers of the west were Scots-Irish people who settled in deep-soiled Pennsylvania when the English government placed restrictions on their productions of linens and woolens. In 1607, Englishmen of southern colonies started the first permanent settlement of the United States at Jamestown in order to find gold to become wealthy. The first colonists…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jurek V. Texas Case Study

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Texas has had several cases rise to the Supreme Court level. There have been many that not only impact the Lone Star State, but also the nation’s justice department. Every court case offers a new side to any issue being addressed and aides in future decisions on cases dealing with the same subject. These cases allow improvements of the operation of the Justice Department. Jurek v. Texas is one of the cases that follows prior case decisions, but also allows for further improvements of the justice system.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some judicial scholars, alongside popular belief, suspect that the political affiliation of judges has a great influence in their judgments. Based on the level of judiciary hierarchy, this relationship can have different effect on decision making process. ‘In what manner’ or ‘for what purpose’ questions always follow the every judge’s decision. Others view judges as politically independent decision makers. This group believe that judges’ decisions are guaranteed by statutes, standards, and constitutional requirements.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case set the precedent that states are within their rights to regulate the use of the United States flag. The opinion rejected Halter’s main argument, they could not see any argument that he could have made which would have made the law unconstitutional. In Des Moines, Iowa in 1965, John F. Tinker, 15 years old, and Christopher Eckhardt, 16 years old, attended high schools in Des Moines, Iowa, and Mary Beth Tinker, who is John 's sister, 13-years-old and a student in junior high school planned on wearing black armbands in order to protest the governments policy in Vietnam. The school upon learning about the immanent protest soon adopted rules regulating the wearing of armbands, all students who attended school while wearing an armband…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Duel Justice Watkins, Robert GCU Duel Justice The United States of America utilizes a duel court system in its judicial system. The two courts systems are federal and state. Courts that exist at the state or local level are established by the individual state, and exist “within states there are also local courts that are established by cities, counties, and other municipalities, which we are including in the general discussion of state courts.” Courts that exist at the Federal level have been established under the United States Constitution and rule on disputes concerning the Constitution and laws that are passed by Congress.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays