Permissible To Torture

Decent Essays
Is it ever permissible to torture a person?

Premise 1: Torturing someone is always brutal and not acceptable in the United States.

Premise 2: Torturing someone is always brutal and acceptable but highly effective method in other countries.

Premise 3: Torturing someone is always brutal yet it doses not serve a purpose to stop crime from recurring, in fact, ought to be inhumane.

Conclusion: Therefore, torturing someone in order to stop crime from recurring is inhumane.

I want to prove that my conclusion is valid based on my three premises. My three premises is true because I have considered possible objections and possible ways to strengthen my arguments. All in all, Is it ever permissible to torture a person? in which my conclusion supports

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Term Torture

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Merriam Webster defines torture as the act of causing severe physical pain as a form of punishment or as a way to force someone to do or say something. Moreover, there are international instruments which define the term torture. For example, a very broad definition of torture has been presented…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If every form of death penalty is at risk of “extreme pain or torture” then no one should have to do die by being executed. Sentencing someone to death denies them the right to life – enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Right(Amnesty). The traditional method of death by hanging was also easily bungled: If the drop was too short, there would be a slow and agonizing death by strangulation; if the drop was too long, the individual’s head would be torn off (Aclu). Absolutely no one should have to die by having their head torn off or by strangulation, and if the death penalty has risks that big then nobody should have to be a victim of this cruel…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    America should have torture as a form of punishment. Less crimes would be committed. As for this, with this knowledge being known, crimes such as first degree murder, rape, ect. & instead of shedding the mercy of death to a person who committed such terrible acts, we should rain the misery of life & with this knowledge at hand along with knowledge that this isn’t some threats of barks would bring fear to the sins that make us fear them.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jacob barrett Mr. Ricci November 4, 2014 Ap English Is Torture Necessary For the United States In the debate on torture in the United states, it is the widely believed that torture is a reasonable way to obtain information. The United Nations Convention for discussing Torture passed in 1994, torture to be defined as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person” in order to collect information or to punish the person “for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or for the intimidation to coercing him or a third person for any reason.” Torture in most situations is both time sensitive and necessary to save lives along with that…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How do you determine if and when the use of torture would be ethical? Let’s begin by examining the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances on the moral and ethical use of torture. John Stuart Mills’ theory on the ethical of the use of torture is that it is acceptable if it brings happiness and/or pleasure to the majority of people than if the torture were not carried out. One example he gives to support that theory is, if a terrorist has information that will prevent an act of terror that would result in the death of hundreds of innocent people and by obtaining this information thru an act of torture, it would likely save those lives he would agree…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, however, different forms of inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment as well as torture are practised in all parts of the world, including highly industrialised and developed countries. Despite the fact that society is evolving, the effect of torture remains the same: such violations of human rights result in serious harm to the human being, to his physical and mental immunity, and requires a lot of effort to make it stop. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” . For many years international legal institutions have been developing, improving and consolidating different ways of resolving the problem. At…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hundreds of years later several countries have signed the “Convention Against Torture” in agreement that torture will not be practiced in their country. As the world had progressed, torture has significantly reduced, however, the concept of torture being wrong and unjust originated several hundred years ago during the…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The benefits massively outweigh the cost of torture. One man isn't worth the lives. Of…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    You awaken in a dark room, with no recollection of how you got there. You realize that you sit across from a few men, with a table separating from you. Next to the men you see a bucket filled with water and a rag. You are blinded by a bright white light and one of the men bangs on the table and says, “We know you are with the terrorists. So where are they hiding?”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment: An Annotated Bibliography When considering the possibility that capital punishment could be justified as a response towards evil action. Approvingly that capital punishment is an appropriate crime punishment in a response to murder, “the greatest crime known to the law.” As capital punishment is not morally permissible as a response to evil, then it cannot be permissible morally. If capital punishment cannot be justified towards a response in evils acts, when will it ever be justified.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout human history, torture has been used to methodically obtain information by inflicting psychological or physical pain on an individual. The practice of torture has been prohibited under The United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights, which has been sanctioned by 155 nations (The United Nations, 1984). Nevertheless, the United States has ratified the use of torture as recently as 2008. The Bush administration allowed the use of torture methods in interrogations of individuals connected to the September 11th attacks and al-Qaeda. The United States was not the only nation that disobeyed the United Nation’s demand for a cease of torture tactics; countries such as England, France, India, and Russia have all turned to torture in order…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Torture Unethical

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On September 27, 2002, Magnus Gäfgen kidnapped 11-year-old Jakob von Metzler. Fast forward to four days later, when Gäfgen was arrested by German police, who had watched a ransom demanded by Gäfgen be paid out to him, yet with no release of the child was not released or his location.. With time running out and tensions growing, deputy police chief of Frankfurt, Wolfgang Daschner, ordered torture, upon which Gäfgen disclosed Metzler 's location just minutes before the action could be committed, only for police to find Metzler, whose body was at a lake in rural Frankfurt, was already dead.1 While the threat of torture in this scenario may have worked and revealed the location of Metzler 's body, the order was ultimately unethical not only in deontological and consequentialist viewpoints regarding human rights and law itself, but also in a virtue ethics viewpoint regarding human morality. This essay will discuss how the call for torture was unethical based upon deontological, consequentialist, and virtue ethics.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays