Outline On Hate Speech

Improved Essays
Working Thesis: The protection of hate speech is essential to ensuring the continuation of free speech, as defined in the U.S. Constitution.
I. Free speech is not an absolute right. Your right to free speech should be limited to use that do not impede on the rights of others.
A) Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. argued that, “The right to swing my fist ends where the other man’s nose begins.” This should be applied to free speech, as well.
B) Freedom of Speech is an important value, however it is not the only value.
II. Hate Speech bans cannot be proven to reduce discrimination.
A) There is no reason for a ban, if it doesn't better a society.
B) Who determines what constitutes “hate” speech?
III. Hate Speech isn't speech at all, its incitement.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Magna Carta was an influential, historical document that impacted society in several ways. It was signed by the British King John. The King signed it, unaware of all rights he was giving up. The Magna Carta was basically 63 grievances of the noblemen in Britain. The Magna Carta was just as impactful now as it was then.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having Free Speech is the basic right that Americans have, it is the ability to speaks one’s mind and ideas. Theres are many benefits to having the ability to project ideas without censorship. Caleb Yong author of “Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?” argues that the liberal justice has a special protection against the restriction of speech and expression, he calls it “Free Speech Principle” where it includes its “sensitivity to the distinction between coverage and protection (Yong)” that the speech should be monitored. Hate speech is too broad to single out the negative effect that it can have in any group. The main concept of this article includes the four categories that hate speech can be set in.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all are entitled to freedom of speech but what is it when freedom of speech turns into a hate crime. Begging the question could be used as the logical fallacy with this article. Freedom of Speech is our constitutional right. Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community to articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or sanction. People will continue to express themselves no matter how anyone else feels about the comments.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First 10 Amendments

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments (changes or additions) to the United States Constitution. The idea behind the Bill of Rights was to insure certain freedoms and rights to the citizens of America. It puts limits on what the government could do and control. Freedoms protected include freedom of religion, speech, assembly, the right to bear arms, unreasonable search and seizure of your home, the right to a speedy trial, and more. Simply put, the first 10 amendments are: Amendment 1 (Freedom of Speech) -…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The freedom to speech is very important to many Americans. However, many wonder if some speech should be prohibited especially while online. This is because it is harming, slandering, or hateful. The best way to evaluate this issue is through Deontology. This is because every American has a right to free speech, according to the constitution, they also have duties and consequences that come with being able to say whatever they want.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment of the constitution is the right of free speech; throughout our history the first amendment has been interpreted in a number of ways. Despite this fact all Americans agree that this is one of our most important rights, and lays the foundation for our nations core beliefs. The first amendment is a short statement “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (1) Though it holds a great deal of power, it upholds strong personal values, and sets a precedent for the future of our country.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate Speech Codes

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Freedom of speech, a basic right and amendment that most students who grow up in the United States come to learn and take pride in having from a young age. Many of us take this right for granted at times, what we do not realize is that there are so many places around the world that are continuously fighting for this innate right. Although we lack the fortitude at times, it is a vital right to all of us in our identities and abilities to grow as people and become who we are and allow ourselves to excel. The idea of speech codes, which can be commonly defined as: “politically correct" codes but are more commonly known as hate speech codes.” The issue of whether or not speech codes on campuses are justified is an immoral issue, which should in…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The internet is very expansive and can be accessed by anyone in the world that has internet access. This makes a platform for people to also say what they want such as hate speeches. These hate speech’s should be regulated because it incites violence and for the safety of the public. These hate speech’s that are going around on the internet incite violence across the world. For instance a group such as the neo natizis use the internet to spread their message and ideal’s to a large number of people.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Freedom of Speech is one of the core values that is proudly embedded in Americans. Although, some people wonder if there should be limits to this right that Americans have, Freedom of Speech. Many citizens are against different forms of hate speech, yet still understand that hate speech is protected under the first amendment. Hate speech is a way for people to express themselves and defend what they believe in.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comedy In Today's Society

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comically Crude The line drawn between comedy and vulgar references have become blurred in today's society. A comedian may make a joke which offends a great body of people all for the purpose of making a few laugh. Famous comedians make a living off of exploiting both groups, and individual peoples, with derogatory comments in order to make large masses of money. In the past, comedians would cross social lines and force society forward using both obscene language and seemingly deranged or lewd topics.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Fields Case Study

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There have been many opinions about the ruling of the United States v. Fields case. In 2011, Abel Fields spoke at a public safety meeting and stated that he had received the Purple Heart and that he was a part of the military for over eight years. However, his claims were false. Some say that his statement is protected under the first amendment, however, it violates the Stolen Valor Act. This case went through different courts and the ruling was in favor of Abel Fields.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garton Ash believes democracies should move beyond hate speech laws because they prevent “open and robust civility”, are paternalistic in nature, ineffective at preventing prejudice and discrimination, and lead to a slippery slope of what demands protection by law. Garton Ash presents the idea of “open and robust civility” as the balance of tolerance and ability to openly express oneself, which may be intolerant by nature. Hate speech laws prevent the ability for self expression if the views you wish to express are intolerant towards the protected groups. Hate speech laws allow groups to have the opportunity to use the “I’m offended” veto to shut down any speech they dislike. This restricts the openness that Garton Ash claims is just as necessary as the civility for living in a diverse society.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years, the United States has managed to maintain a balance between its institutional powers and personal rights of its citizens. The US constitution has undergone multiple amendments aimed at providing more freedom while the same time protects the national interests. Recently conducted studies revealed that the majority of Americans feel threaten by the decisions made by the federal government (DePlato, 2015). The paper evaluates institution powers and personal rights that the legislature should consider upholding, eliminating, or adding in a bid to balance between personal rights and national interests. The Most Important Institutional Power and Personal Right…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many countries, hate speech has had laws set against it because they believe that it leads to violence, but in the United States it is considered a form of free speech so it is allowed with no limits. As part of the Constitution, freedom of speech is sometimes used so that people are allowed to express their opinions and say as they pleased. Many Americans want to ban hate speech from being a part of the First Amendment because they believe that it causes and provokes violence against others. Others want to defend their rights as citizens and be allowed to express their opinions with each other without being afraid that they might get fined or put in jail because someone didn’t like what they said and got offended. Hate speech should be…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Should national security override free speech?” Freedom of speech was first established in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution in 1791, and almost two centuries later, in the International Declaration of Human Rights, the UN recognised freedom of speech as a human right (reference). The question of whether or not national security should override the freedom of speech has been, and continues to be a controversial subject, particularly among governments and law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays