Officer Turek Case Summary

Decent Essays
Facts: The defendant in this case, Atwater, was pulled over by Officer Turek in Lago Vista, Texas. Atwater was pulled over due to the fact that neither she nor her children, who were sitting in the front seat, were wearing their seatbelts. Officer Turek verbally scolded Atwater, handcuffed her, placed her in his squad car, and drove her to the local police station. Upon arriving to the police station, she was forced to remove her jewelry, shoes, and eyeglasses and was instructed to empty her pockets as well. She was placed in an empty jail cell by police where she remained for about an hour.
Procedural History: Atwater stood in front of a magistrate and was allowed to be released on bond. She was charged with violating the seatbelt law in Lago Vista, Texas. She paid a $50 fine and pleaded no contest to the seatbelt misdemeanors. Atwater and her husband filed a suit claiming that the actions committed by Officer Turek had violated her Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable seizure. Ultimately, the District Court ruled that the arrest was not unreasonable for Fourth Amendment purposes.
…show more content…
Holding: No. The actions of Officer Turek did not violate the defendants Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable seizure. The reason for this is because the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit a warrantless arrest for a minor criminal offense. A seatbelt violation is considered a minor criminal offense by law and is punishable only by a fine, therefore the seizure was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo's Argument Essay

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Friday, June 5th, 2015 Texas police officers aggressively stopped a pool party. At this party a 14-year-old girl was temporarily detained by one of the officers. At the same time other officers were ordering children to lie on the grass while the third officer started handcuffing children around…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case of Illinois v. Wardlow, Sam Wardlow, a 44-year old black man was wrongly searched after he was apparently seen acting ‘suspicious’ when he ran after he saw four police cars driving up. He was then chased by Timothy Nolan, a veteran police officer, as he believed Wardlow as guilty. The officers believed him to be in a ‘high crime area’. They caught up to Wardlow and frisked him. During the search, they found a handgun.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Citation: Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, 566?U.S. ___ (2012) Parties: Albert W Florence,?? Plaintiff Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington et. al,? Defendants Facts: Albert Florence was arrested during a traffic stop by a state trooper as he had a bench warrant for his arrest due to a failed appearance at a fine enforcement hearing.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Deputy Field Observation

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages

    On September 4, 2015 at approximately 12:50 AM I, Deputy Bowring, responded to 886 County Road 2110 Quitman, Texas as a cover unit for Deputy Fields on a disturbance. Upon my arrival, I observed Deputy Fields, speaking with William Walker and Deputy Finlaw was speaking with Regina Smith. Deputy Fields asked William if it was okay if he went inside the residence with Regina to gather her belongings. William stated that was okay, William then asked if he could go inside the residence to get his cell phone Deputy Finlaw, stated not until Regina gets her belongings. Deputy Fields asked Williams if there is anything he needs to know about before he enters the residence William stated no there is nothing.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    • There are three plaintiffs – Dennis Duncan, Donate Christiani, a minor, and Cynthia Fernandez. Plaintiffs claim false arrest and excessive force. Plaintiff Duncan claims that he was punched in the face, back, and chest multiple time after he intervened in a police incident where police officers had mace drawn towards a Hispanic woman, a teenage boy, and a young child. Plaintiff Duncan claims he was handcuffed, maced while on the ground, then thrown against a vehicle. Plaintiff Duncan claims he transported to the 73rd precinct then taken to Kings County Hospital for chest pains.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brower v. Inyo, 109 S. Ct. 1378 (1989) Type of Action: this is a civil suit alleging that Brower constitution right was violated, liability for negligence and wrongful death Facts of the case: The police set out a detour. The detour was set up by stopping a tractor trailer amidst the 2 path parkway which blocked both paths and a police vehicle with its lights glimmering was stopped before the tractor. Brower collided with the tractor trailer and was murdered. The decedent's family recorded a &1983 activity asserting that the Brower’s Fourth Amendment rights to be free from outlandish seizure were abused by the officers who were acting under the shade of law.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Issue: Whether Mr. Howard’s 4th Amendment rights were violated when he was stopped and frisked by officers whose only basis for such a stop was an anonymous phone tip? Facts: Our client, Happy Howard, was carrying a concealed weapon while out at a festival. Upon raising his elbow, another citizen noticed the concealed gun and made an anonymous phone tip to the police.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case Brief Of Us Vs Leon

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leon was charged with violating the federal drug trafficking laws, during trial the court granted Leon’s suppression for motion because the officers didn’t properly issue the warrant on probable cause. The court found that the warrant contained false information which limited corroboration by the officers. The court…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1984 Williams was arrested for committing murder. It’s stated that he “was arrested for the murder a 10 year old girl” (2) which he discarded the body along a gravel road. The crime was committed in Des Moines, Iowa. “Following the disappearance of a 10 year old” (3) girl, about 200 people volunteer to look for the missing child, it stated that “covering an area several miles” (3) both ways. Right at the time of the search, right before William’s was arrested, two days after he killed the girl, he would surrendered to the police on one condition, to not be interrogated.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the search, police found things like a Uzi machine gun, a .38 caliber revolver, two stun guns, and a handcuff key, but did not find the supposedly stolen stuff. Police Officers did confiscate the weapons while in search for the stolen items and used it in court. So therefore his fourth amendment was violated. The 4th amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This action performed by the police officers reminds me of the supreme court case, Mapp V. Ohio.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However if the officer had pulled these individuals over soley based on the color of their skin, he would not be able to search and seize the individuals. The fourth amendment forbids an officer to search and seize soley on the basis of race, and if the officer had racially profiled the individuals then they could have filed a motion to suppress. However, the officer acted within the scope of the seizure by having legitimate interest and suspicions. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that an officer may search the person arrested, those in plain view of the officer and the accused, and things or places that the acussed person can touch, or that is otherwise in their immediate personal control without a warrant as long as there is legitimate reasoning and it is not an unreasonable search.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that he received a call from his wife informing him that his grandmother, Odyssey Rodriguez (non-party) had been arrested and was being held at the 83rd precinct. P claims he went to the 83rd precinct and MOS informed him that Ms. Rodriguez was arrested for criminal trespass at 211 Irving Avenue. P claims that he left the precinct and went to 211 Irving Avenue where he was informed by Katrina Hernandez (non-party) that Mr. Rodriguez was sitting on the steps in the hallway waiting for a friend when MOS arrested her. P claims that he began to walk back to the precinct when two MOS approached him.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment, must primarily demonstrate an expectation of solitude, which is not simply a subjective expectation in attitude; however, an expectation that civilization is prepared to distinguish as realistic under the circumstances. For example, warrantless searches of personally own properties are customarily prohibited without admissible concessions; in contrast, a warrantless confiscation of derelict property typically does not violate the Fourth Amendment. (Legal Information Institution, n.d.) Seizures Seizures transpire when law enforcement physically apprehends a citizen; this frequently occurs during an arrest, though, it can likewise ensue in the course of stopping a pedestrian, a traffic stop or in other situations.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays