My paper will contain information about Northern California and all of the amenities that it has to offer and why it is a better choice than visiting Southern California. The reason I have decided to research California and learn about all of the beautiful cities, wonderful scenery, and the various other things that I will get to experience, is because I am planning a trip to go in September. I have never been to the west coast, but I have heard about how beautiful it is. It wasn’t easy to decide which place I would rather visit. I want to go to a place where it will be a constant adventure. I have to be near a beach, but I also want to be within a few hours of Redwood National Park. I have to take into consideration that I don’t have endless
…show more content…
Northern California is a great atmosphere that gives easy access to transportation. They have a bus system, which helps with the hassle of traveling. The upper part of California has great food to offer. There are four of the 12 three-Michelin-star restaurants located in Northern California. Food lovers cannot go wrong with visiting Northern California. Another perk of visiting upper part of the state would be to see all of the museums and fine architecture that the cities have to offer. The cons of Northern California just seem to be gloomy weather, but that isn’t in every city. The pros of Southern California is that it has more superior beaches and more attractions, but with having better beaches and more tourist areas, comes more of a crowd. Southern California also has more sunshine. Too much sunshine can become a con due to the lack of rainfall causing drought. The author argues that both locations have many great aspects, while also giving a downfall of each. This information helps to supports the thesis because the author talks about how the northern areas of California typically tend to have more delicious and various kinds food. The article also states that there are many museums and lots of architecture to see. This supports the thesis because it fits into the scenery …show more content…
I think that by comparing the two it makes it obvious that Northern California is the better choice. It doesn’t go into depth about the locations of where the architecture and museums are, but it does give the information to look into. This will help support my thesis because I need want to see beautiful scenery and enjoy the time I spend away from Ohio. This article also talks about how Northern California is a great place to visit for food lovers. I think that trying new food is important, especially good food. The article doesn’t say which restaurants specifically are great to try, but it did say that it is home to four 3-Michelin-star. I don’t think that I am going to include how Southern California has certain pros because it will take away from my argument. It is a fair point that the southern parts of California is warmer and has more attractions, but it isn’t fitting to what I am looking for, for my
Northern California is a great atmosphere that gives easy access to transportation. They have a bus system, which helps with the hassle of traveling. The upper part of California has great food to offer. There are four of the 12 three-Michelin-star restaurants located in Northern California. Food lovers cannot go wrong with visiting Northern California. Another perk of visiting upper part of the state would be to see all of the museums and fine architecture that the cities have to offer. The cons of Northern California just seem to be gloomy weather, but that isn’t in every city. The pros of Southern California is that it has more superior beaches and more attractions, but with having better beaches and more tourist areas, comes more of a crowd. Southern California also has more sunshine. Too much sunshine can become a con due to the lack of rainfall causing drought. The author argues that both locations have many great aspects, while also giving a downfall of each. This information helps to supports the thesis because the author talks about how the northern areas of California typically tend to have more delicious and various kinds food. The article also states that there are many museums and lots of architecture to see. This supports the thesis because it fits into the scenery …show more content…
I think that by comparing the two it makes it obvious that Northern California is the better choice. It doesn’t go into depth about the locations of where the architecture and museums are, but it does give the information to look into. This will help support my thesis because I need want to see beautiful scenery and enjoy the time I spend away from Ohio. This article also talks about how Northern California is a great place to visit for food lovers. I think that trying new food is important, especially good food. The article doesn’t say which restaurants specifically are great to try, but it did say that it is home to four 3-Michelin-star. I don’t think that I am going to include how Southern California has certain pros because it will take away from my argument. It is a fair point that the southern parts of California is warmer and has more attractions, but it isn’t fitting to what I am looking for, for my