The election in Latin America were “managed elections” in which landowners in Chile, Brazil, and Argentina would run for office the elections were fixed to insure victory went to landowner with the most power. In Mexico, the rules of the nation were in the form of dictators with the strongest military might. Even though the elections were fixed or the country ran by a dictator, it did provide a stable authoritarian government that was needed to attract foreign investors. With the liberal reforms that represented change for landowners who want to sell coffee, hides, and tobacco, and middle classes wanted improved streets, sanitation, and education looked to the Industrial Revolution for potential markets and advance technology to improve Latin America, but to be able to create and sustain an exporting economy in the world market these countries would need: ports, canals, and railways.(5) To make this happen the countries borrowed most of the money to finance these facilities, or in the case of
The election in Latin America were “managed elections” in which landowners in Chile, Brazil, and Argentina would run for office the elections were fixed to insure victory went to landowner with the most power. In Mexico, the rules of the nation were in the form of dictators with the strongest military might. Even though the elections were fixed or the country ran by a dictator, it did provide a stable authoritarian government that was needed to attract foreign investors. With the liberal reforms that represented change for landowners who want to sell coffee, hides, and tobacco, and middle classes wanted improved streets, sanitation, and education looked to the Industrial Revolution for potential markets and advance technology to improve Latin America, but to be able to create and sustain an exporting economy in the world market these countries would need: ports, canals, and railways.(5) To make this happen the countries borrowed most of the money to finance these facilities, or in the case of