Negligence Under Tort Law

Improved Essays
This case was categorized under tort law, as it involves two separate litigants clearing an altercation about something. For this case, Cindy and Stephen Martin’s daughter, Kelsey Lee, was pronounced stillborn at the hospital. The doctor responsible for the couple, Lynn Marriott, admitted that it was her negligence that caused the child to be stillborn. To compensate for their pain and suffering, the couple sued Marriott and the hospital to receive non-pecuniary damages. Their claim was that Cindy Martin was entitled to the damages since the hospital’s negligence was what resulted the fetus was her “body part” to die.
In court, the legal question was raised about whether or not the Martins should receive non-pecuniary damages for bereavement,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case displayed an unintentional tort that involved negligence on the part of the defendant and his care of the deceased. On May 18, 1994, Emanuel Wilkes, Sr. and Emanuel Wilkes, Jr. (the plaintiff’s) filed a complaint against Dr. Charles M. Dorrough, Jr (the defendant), and Boliver County Hospital (BCH) which alleged that…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ellis Vs Glayson Summary

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: This case was brought about when Jean Price, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against Lorene Ellis and Henrietta Glayson, the defendant and co-defendant, claiming that they had maliciously and falsely accused ms. Price of adultery and defamed Ms. Price’s reputation to her husband. On May 9th, 1995, Ms. Glayson called the plaintiff’s husband to inform him that his wife, who was three months pregnant, had an affair with another man and that the child Ms. Price was carrying could possibly be the other man’s. The plaintiff had a miscarriage on May 16th, 1995. Price alleged in her complaint against Ellis and Glayson she underwent personal humiliation, embarrassment, weightloss, difficulty sleeping and eating, and injury to her reputation. The plaintiff already had complications with her pregnancy and did not claim that the phone call caused the miscarriage.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He is responsible for demonstrating that he paid the money to her based on her expert recommendation. As a result of believing in her, he was injured. Ultimately, Meredith has the burden of…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Of Negligence

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages

    After Officer Onge explained what to do in case of emergency, his first call came in. Dispatch had received a call from a gentleman by the name of Mr. Jenkins. The situation was that Mr. Jenkins was riding near the construction on Canton Connecter when a piece of rock fell out of a dump truck and damaged the windshield of his vehicle. Mr. Jenkins needed an officer to come so that he could file this accident with his insurance company. After some miscommunication, and trying for find this gentleman for over 15 minutes, we finally found him and his jeep on the side of an exit.…

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malice Liability Case

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Question 1: A: True. Malice aforethought is “a planned killing motivated by spite” (Woolman, Homicide). Additionally, there is express malice. Express malice is the “defendant’s subjective intent to kill”, or more specifically their feelings or opinions (ChartaCourse). Hatred or the emotional equivalent is a person’s feelings or opinions and goes directly to subjective intent to kill.…

    • 4029 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this trial, the question the court is being asked to answer is whether Alex Cooper was responsible for his own injuries. Throughout this trial, the law applied was negligence. Negligence is broken down into four parts: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Due to the nature of this trial as a civil suit, the plaintiff had the burden of proof, meaning the burden to prove by the greater weight of the credible evidence.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Niles had every right to file a lawsuit against the City of San Rafael because there was a breach of duty that caused foreseeable damage to the Kelly. If Kelly would have suffered no harm, then that would have not been grounds to sue. Mr. Niles won the case because he was able to prove that all four elements of negligence were present. Mr. Niles was able to prove that duty of care was not properly conducted. Duty is defined as the legal obligation of care, performance, or observance to safeguard the rights of others.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the laws about comparative negligence, you are able to seek damages from the other party in a car accident. Even if you were partially at fault, you are entitled to recover the percent of the damages that was not your fault. If you were 40 percent at fault for a $100,000 accident, you would be able to recover 60 percent, or $60,000, of the total amount. The “No-Fault” Laws in Florida…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Under California law, the first aspect that must be established in a negligence case is the existence of duty. The existence of duty depends on “foreseeability of risk.” If there is a foreseeable risk, then it becomes the duty of an individual to adhere to solving it. If the individual fails to resolve the issue, and someone is harmed, that individual could then held liable for the incident. (6 Witkin, Summary of Cal.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim Robyn Broadwater Kaplan University October 18, 2016 MEMORANDUM Date: October 18, 2016 To: Candie Cardigan, CEO, CARDWARE Inc. From: Robyn Broadwater Re: Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim ______________________________________________________________________________…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately classified under a primary victim. The first element is duty, whether it was owed to the plaintiff. The law acknowledges the relationship between the defendant and plaintiff, and the existing relation in turn may justify that the defendant is obliged to…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In these two chapters, Epp provides a detailed analysis of what he calls legalized accountability and its development. After noticing a shortcoming after the rights revolution in the 1960’s and 1970’s in which local bureaucracies failed to recognize the rights recognized by the Supreme Court, Epp analyzes a way in which activists took to the courts to enact social change. He argues that the expansion of tort law and liability litigation through the cases of Monroe v Pape and Monell v Department of Social Services helped create more onus on bureaucracies to protect and respect rights granted by the Supreme Court and he evaluates how these bureaucracies responded to the threat of liability litigation in the form of legalized accountability. In…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort: Appropriate Case

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Upon further research on this case, I came across an article confirming that the result of the lawsuit filed on behalf of the father and son was a success and settled before the trial. With the information gathered from the article the case is a tort. Also, in my opinion, there could be the possibility that the family wanted the privacy of the case. Interesting, I came across another lawsuit filed against the A&R Barbeque restaurant by a lawyer Jason Wentworth on behalf of Toby and Shandalin Taylor.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tort Of Negligence Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue The matters involved in the case facts is if Rebecca can sue Michelle for negligence based on tort law and Rebecca?s decision to accept the ride home even if she knows that Michelle was drunk to drive. Rule The court needs to prove that Michelle has a duty of care to Rebecca. Secondly, there needs to be a breach of this duty due to the negligent conduct of Michelle.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Malpractice Case

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two nurses who worked at Phoenixville Hospital were being suing negligence which caused a baby to be born with brain damage. Medical Malpractice Case The case of Lily Ciechoski People today are suing healthcare professionals has become all too common.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays