Negligence Case Analysis

Improved Essays
The potential tort that was committed in this case analysis, if any, would be negligence. “Negligence occurs when someone sustains personal injury but there is no intent to cause injury” (Spengler, Anderson, Connaughton, & Baker, 2016). When it comes to lawsuits involving negligence, the plaintiff must follow rules which are sometimes called elements. Four essential elements must be proved with negligent cases: standard of care, breach of duty, causation, and injury (damages). All four elements must exist for a plaintiff to recover (be award money) in a negligence case. The first element is standard of care, “The standard of care is the duty or responsibility owed by a defendant (this could be a person or an organization) to another” (Spengler …show more content…
“Breach of duty, requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant breached the duty of care” (Spengler et al., 2016). Causation is the third element that must be proved. “Causation refers to the claim in a negligence case that the acts or inaction of the defendant brought about injury to the plaintiff” (Spengler et al., 2016). The last element is injury (damages). “For any cause of action based on negligence, some actual harm or injury must exist” (Spengler et al., 2016). After actual harm or injury is established, there are a variety of damages that can be recovered to compensate the plaintiff, they depend on the circumstances. “Compensatory damages for physical pain and suffering, mental distress, direct economic loss, loss of consortium, and wrongful death” (Spengler et al., 2016). In particular cases, a plaintiff could also recover punitive damages. “Punitive damages differ from compensatory damages because punitive damages are awarded to punish the defendant rather than compensate the victim” (Spengler et al., …show more content…
The most reputable certifications are from the American Council on Exercise (ACE) and the Aerobics and Fitness Association of America (AFAA). These two certifying bodies are accredited by the National Commission for Certifying Agencies, the gold standard for program accreditation. The instructors must study and take an exam before receiving their certification. Particular programs offer live classes, while others have self-study materials. “The course is designed to teach you he basics of exercise and physiology, how to choreograph and teach group classes, the specifics of various modalities of group fitness, nutrition and weight management foundations, working with special populations and related business skills” (Carlin, 2018). Other course materials cover kinesiology, anatomy, class design and injury prevention. The certifications do not provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or automated external defibrillator (AED) training and it is typically required. Before instructors obtain their certification, proof of CPR and AED certification will need to be provided and must be maintained while instructing classes. The certifications vary when it comes to whether it is governmental or not. For example, the AFAA and the ACE are accredited by the National Commission for Certifying

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Illinois has a modified comparative negligence structure in that the plaintiff’s claim is barred if the jury finds that the plaintiff’s comparative negligence is more than fifty percent. Instruction B45.01 of the Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions informs the jury of this rule of law and this has been shown to discourage juries from finding plaintiffs more than fifty percent at fault for their injuries. If the jury determines that plaintiff’s comparative negligence to be fifty percent or less, then the amount of the verdict is reduced by the same percentage as the plaintiff’s comparative negligence. Based upon the investigation that we have been able to complete to date, we believe that a jury will allocate the majority of liability against…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eeoc Case Study

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Protected Activity- Filing a formal complaint of discrimination or harassment with EEOC is a protected activity. Rebuttable Presumption: facts, that are accepted by a court until it is proved to the untrue. Relief Sought- Plaintiff must identify the damages or other relief sought in their complaint or pleading.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Niles had every right to file a lawsuit against the City of San Rafael because there was a breach of duty that caused foreseeable damage to the Kelly. If Kelly would have suffered no harm, then that would have not been grounds to sue. Mr. Niles won the case because he was able to prove that all four elements of negligence were present. Mr. Niles was able to prove that duty of care was not properly conducted. Duty is defined as the legal obligation of care, performance, or observance to safeguard the rights of others.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stella Liebeck Case Study

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case of Stella Liebeck This is classic case that happened in 1992 in the parking lot of a McDonald restaurant. Stella Liebeck who was 72 years old purchased a cup of coffee that accidently spilled and burned her. She suffered third degree burn. She sued McDonald for damages and the case finally went to court and was settled. There are a number of things that we firstly have to define in this case in-order to fully understand the legality of the case.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim Robyn Broadwater Kaplan University October 18, 2016 MEMORANDUM Date: October 18, 2016 To: Candie Cardigan, CEO, CARDWARE Inc. From: Robyn Broadwater Re: Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim ______________________________________________________________________________…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The various ways that this case can be analyzed will result in different people arguing different facts dealing with contract law, agency law, and torts. The plaintiff and their lawyer could attack this case from several angles. Ethics will be at the forefront of this case with the how to go about getting justice for Mrs. Spirelli and her child as they were at the wrong place at the wrong time. There isn’t much doubt that if the State/Mr. Spirelli would sue Dr. Benzene and/or Mr. Johnson they would win. So the question really is who should they sue?…

    • 1286 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Questions: 1) What kind of damages is he entitled to? There are three kinds of categories of damages that may be available in this fact pattern: General damages: which refer to the individual's cost of suffering; cannot put an exact price - loss of enjoyment of life -physical and mental pain and suffering -loss of future earning capaicty Special damages: which refer to the expenses caused by the negligence,for example medical bills, work that was missed, future loss of wages, earnings and future medical bills, and or therapies etc. Punitive damages: which refer to the actual knowledge that the doctor was aware that he / she was behaving in a harmful manner.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Business Law: Tort Law

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue: Zain and Gary met in a tram and use to travel together for many years and therefore become good friends as. Gary who is a barista has recently inherited $60000 from his grandmother and has no sense where he should invest his money so Gary took advice from Zain (who is an accountant and a good friend of Gary) whether he should invest his inheritance in widget Ltd so Zain told Gary that according to him Widget is a good investment. Gary then invest his $60000 in the company however in a week, Widget Ltd went into liquidation and Gary losses all of his inheritance. Gary found that when he purchased the shares, the financial position of the company was not so good which was known by many accountants. As Widget Ltd was in trouble has…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some aspects of this media article relate to the tort law of negligence. This is because all of the elements of the negligence are presented in the media article. Those elements are duty of care, breach of duty and causation of damages (Kelly, Hayward and Hammer 2011).The Water Corp had a duty of care to identify correctly the lot and connect the water supply to it. However, the breach of duty occurred from the moment that the connection was done to the neighboring lot. Regarding the causation of damages, the article quotes the writ estimates that it will cost $519,000 for building a new…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The first question was what legal risks that Clean Aqua is facing under statute law for the product. The court of law applied in this case is the tort of negligence. Negligence is a tort – a civil wrong recognised by the courts which entitles the injured person to compensation. The manufacturer, Clean Aqua supplies their appliances to the retailer, EnviroPro that is later sold to the customers.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A tort is a wrongful action that injures or hinders an individual or their property. A tort case is a municipal court proceeding. A tort can be intentional or unintentional (negligence), or it can be a tort of firm liability. If somebody commits a tort, the individual hurt can litigate and get a judgment for damages.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Business Tort and Contract Law Question 1 I. Dam Good as a business entity may be legally liable for the death of the pilot and the four passengers on board under ordinary and strict liability negligence. If the elements of these heads of tortious liability can be proved on a preponderance of evidence or on a balance of probabilities, then the estates of these victims could successfully claim from Dam Goods. According to Owen, in order to successfully prove liability in negligence, plaintiff must establish or adduce evidence tending to prove the presence of a duty of care, a breach or violation of that and a consequent loss, damage, death, harm or injury to the plaintiff (1673).…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Tests For Negligence

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the laws of the tort of negligence statute, two tests are used to determine a case in the courts. These are the but for and the material causation tests. (Weir, Smyth 2015.) In this essay I will be discussing how to start a negligence case, what are the two tests, the differences between the two tests for negligence, and how and when to use these tests for the laws of negligence with case examples. First, we will start off what is negligence and how to start.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Extraordinary, Chief Justice Traynor revolutionized American product liability law through his influential concurring opinion in Escola v. Coca-Cola (Escola). Justice Traynor’s’ concurring opinion in Escola argues for affirmance of the jury award of damages in the case on the grounds of strict liability rather than negligence. The concurring opinion made a “difference and laid the groundwork” for our modern legal rules of product liability. Previous cases and other legal devices prior to Escola display and develop the procedure of product liability law.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Act Case Study

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Part - A Negligence Act Introduction: Lead that falls beneath the norms of conduct built up by law for the insurance of others against irrational risk of hurt. A man has acted carelessly in the event that he or she has withdrawn from the lead expected of a sensibly reasonable person acting under comparable conditions. With a specific end goal to set up carelessness as a Cause of Action under the law of TORTS, an offended party must demonstrate that the litigant had a duty to the offended party, the respondent ruptured that obligation by neglecting to comply with the required standard of lead, the defendant's careless direct was the reason for the mischief to the offended…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays