Murder of another human being has been as the most corrupt and vile act man can commit, but when diving into the multitude of possibilities that take place during or prior to the murder, one begins to ponder the possibility of validation behind the murder. Furthermore, the assessment of the murderer has to be conclusive and irrefutable, factors such as home life, abuse, drugs, psychopathy, and numerous other factors must be present when considering any justification. Self defense is the most profound argument when …show more content…
Furthermore, some question the sheer morality of murder by using the argument that we as people have no power to decide the death of another being. The act of self-defense is an inappropriate argument to use according to debate.org when they write “the moral thing to do is to utilize our critical thinking abilities to apply currently available, and develop new, techniques and technology necessary to resolve immoral acts morally” (debate.org). The technological growth and readily available alternatives besides murder is a viable argument but seems sardonic when not questioning the possible scenarios that could take place when self-defense is