Mumford V. Mumford Case Summary

Decent Essays
Show More
A federal judge has ordered the attorney for the Utah Republican Party to show why he shouldn't be held in contempt of court for repeatedly missing filing deadlines in the ongoing dispute over a law changing the state's nominating system.

U.S. District Judge David Nuffer said in an order Thursday that attorney Marcus Mumford has missed 17 filing deadlines after he was asked to toss out the party's latest motion for summary judgment in the case because it was not filed in time.

Nuffer said Mumford could be disqualified from the case and sanctioned if he cannot explain the repeated missed deadlines.
However, in a filing Friday, Mumford contended that lawyers from the attorney general's office are distorting the facts and they, too, have missed

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Brown V. Furlow Case Study
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brown V. Furlow Case Study

    Furlow, 04-CV-5887 Our File No. 5-987 Statement of Facts: John Brown sued his dentist, Dr. Thomas Furlow, claiming he was injured as a result of Dr. Furlow’s failure to extract an infected tooth on August 3. John Brown ignored Dr. Furlow’s recommendation to return because his tooth was infected. Mr. Brown then went on vacation and while on vacation he passed out due to infection, pain, and the infection spreading. Mr. Brown incurred medical expense and loss of wages. Furlow was served with a complaint on March 1.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 5 Assignment
    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Nt1330 Unit 5 Assignment

    I am fully understand and really want to help, but I cannot asked for any changes without having specific alternative dates. We cannot schedule any more hearings in November (between 9-18), because the other side or the arbitrator have other obligations. As mentioned before, if you want me to ask the other side to reschedule more hearings (or the arbitrator in case they refuse) we must suggest alternative dates for additional 11 hearings. This means that you will need to be here for 3-4 weeks, from January 18 until February 9 at least (excluding travel) – Is it ok?…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anthony Mendez Case Summary
    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anthony Mendez Case Summary

    On January 23, 2014, Anthony Hernandez was indicted in Salem Superior Court for Conspiracy to Violate Drug Laws. As a result, on February 25, 2014, Anthony Hernandez’s mother, Maria Hernandez, hired Attorney Gary Zerola to represent Anthony; Zerola had previously represented Anthony in other unrelated legal matters. The criminal matter in which Anthony had been involved stems from a narcotics distribution investigation conducted by the New York Queens County District Attorney. During the course of the investigation the Queens District Attorney’s Office obtained a wiretap warrant which ultimately led to criminal charges against thirteen individuals including Anthony. On September 17, 2013, the Queens District Attorney’s Office sought a protective order to redact portions of the warrant and affidavit, because they felt the release of the information…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Brady V. Maryland 373
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case: Brady V. Maryland 373

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Harvard Business Law Case
    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Harvard Business Law Case

    -Case D267744 Exhibit A June 15, 2016 Selena Ives Attachment for Response Declaration My basis for this Writ of Execution for money judgments, is that Respondent, Mr. Hunter, has failed to comply with his court order regarding the medical co-pay for the past 16 months, pursuant to code 4062 and 4063. Exhibit A- The FOAH filed November 18, 2014 page 2-5 2.1-states starting July 1, 2014 installments of $100.00 a month In the event any such payment becomes more than 10 days overdue, the entire unpaid balance shall become immediately due and payable without further notice.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    People V Smith Case Summary
    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People V Smith Case Summary

    The People v. Smith case was decided in 1991 by the Supreme Court of Michigan. The issue was that a defendant, Ricky Franklin Smith, argued he should be resentenced because of the inclusion of the presentence investigation report of his previously expunged juvenile record (People, 1991). The Court of Appeals in Michigan agreed with the defendant and required that Smith be sentenced again. The Supreme Court, however, heard the case and reverse the decision stating the Smith did not need to be sentenced again on the basis of the inclusion of his juvenile record alone. Smith was originally convicted of breaking and entering, largely based upon his decision to plead guilty.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier Case Summary
    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeier Case Summary

    In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the question of whether a group of students’ rights under the first amendment are violated is asked. These students had written articles for their school newspaper, which they had then submitted for review to their advisor, who passed the articles on to the principal, Robert Reynolds. Reynolds found two articles concerning, and with the approval of his superiors, eradicated the two pages that these articles were on from that publication of the newspaper. The principal’s deletion of these articles did violate the students’ rights under the 1st Amendment.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Roe V. Rockford
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case Study Roe V. Rockford

    2. Who are the stakeholders in this case study and what are their interests and agendas?. Dr. Richard Ragsdale opened an abortion service in Rockford for the past 12 years. Because Dr Richard’ Ragsdale’s landlord refused to renew the lease, he was forced to move the site. When Dr Richard Ragsdale submitted paperwork to the state for the new location, he was advised that there is a public hearing to consider the need for the new facility.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Two Types Of Disbarment And Violations In Court
    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two Types Of Disbarment And Violations In Court

    Four attorneys from Bergen County New Jersey, previously barred to practice law, were charged with alleged misuse of clients’ funds and unauthorized practice of law. The attorneys were arrested following complaints triggered by civilians and based on information from the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics. Lawrence Jaskot from Lodi who was disbarred in January of 2014 is accused of taking more than $75,000 from his attorney’s trust account for personal expenses. Leonard Adoff, another disbarred attorney, allegedly used $73,000 from an attorney trust account to pay off illegal gambling debts. Jonathan Greenman, another continued to practice law after his license was suspended and received money related to a real-estate matter than he never…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott V. John Sandford Supreme Court Case Analysis
    • 1855 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dred Scott V. John Sandford Supreme Court Case Analysis

    March 6, 1875 a court verdict that will preside in infamy, the verdict of the Dred Scott versus John Sandford Supreme Court case. Dred Scott, a once enslaved African-American man who then moved with his wife to Illinois, a free state or one in which slavery is illegal. By virtue of not being allowed to purchase land undeterred by the fact that under state legislation he was a free man, Dred Scott attempted to sue in a federal court. The chief justice in this case was Chief Justice Roger B Taney, a Federalist white man. He was also born and raised in a slaveholding household, obviously one that was against the freedom of negroes in America.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Example Of Complaint
    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Example Of Complaint

    The plaintiff filed her pro se lawsuit on September 4, 2014 and served our client with the complaint on September 8, 2014. Count I of the complaint alleges that our client is liable for the negligent hiring, training and supervision of “Darla L/N/A”. Count II of the complaint alleges that our client is liable under a respondeat superior theory. On October 6, 2014, Jonathan Nessler filed his appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. On October 8, 2014, we filed our motion to dismiss, which attacks both counts of the complaint as being insufficiently pled.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mosley V. Mosely Case
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mosley V. Mosely Case

    On March 26, 1968, the city of Chicago had adopted an ordinance that prohibited protesting within 150 feet of a school during school hours with an exception for peaceful labor protest that would go into effect on April 5, 1968. A man by the name of Earl Mosley had been protesting against black discrimination on the sidewalk beside Jones Commercial High School for seven months prior to the enactment of the ordinance. After seeing the announcement in the newspaper, Mosley had contacted the Chicago Police Department to find out how the ordinance would affect him. The police department informed him saying that if the protesting continued they would arrest him. On April 4, 1968, the day before the ordinance would be enacted, Mosely had ceased…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Mccleskey Court Case
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Mccleskey Court Case

    The issues started when McCleskey, an African American, was convicted of two charges of robbery and one charge of murder and was sentenced to the death penalty. These actions were taken on the account of McCleskey robbing a furniture store in Atlanta, Georgia and murdering a Caucasian police officer in the process, by shooting him with a gun. Later witnesses brought in the gun he used, and one of the bullets that were fired that night. The jury did find him guilty and charged him for the things he did. McCleskey tried to defend himself in court by stating that they were violating the eighth and fourteenth amendment, which both explain things about equal protection rights, and cruel and harsh punishments, given to those who are tired.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Case Analysis
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marbury Vs Madison Case Analysis

    Brandon Henderson Professor Dr. Edoh Agbehonou Pols 1101 17 April 2015 The decision between Marbury v. Madison was made under judicial review and is considerably the most important decision in the history of the United States, judicial review is when the doctrine of legislative and executive actions are under review. This case gave the supreme says “The government of the united states is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written” (5 U.S 137). Court the power to limit congressional power.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Katzenbach V Grant Case Study
    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Katzenbach V Grant Case Study

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings