Mrs. Loisel's Fault In The Necklace

Improved Essays
In The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant, Mrs. Loisel endures ten years of hard inducing work, only to discover that she did all of it for nothing, wasting a decade of her life, but is the blame primarily her fault? The discovery of the necklace fraud might lead the reader to believe that this whole situation is all on Mrs. Loisel. Now it might be easy to say she made the primary mistake on that dreadful night, however there are a lot of factors to consider that might sway one’s opinion on the subject. This can include the society at the time putting not only pressure onto her, but many other women as well, and the instincts in her brain subconsciously leading her to do what she did. Mrs. Loisel does not take full responsibility in this situation …show more content…
and Mrs. Loisel do is come up with a plan to lie to Madame Forestier in order to obtain more time. Now, if they had told the truth, not only would they not have discovered the necklace only cost at most five hundred francs, they would have saved themselves ten years of hard enduring work. Even if this is true, it is not their fault’s that the first thought was to fib their way out of it. Based on one of Freud’s theories, which states that the unconscious mind is more prevalent in our decision making then we think (Saul McLeod, 2013), Mr. and Mrs. Loisel only lied instinctually because their unconscious mind made them believe that what they’re were doing would solve the main issue of the lost necklace. This was whether or not their conscious and normal behavioral attitude thought it was morally wrong. In addition to this, when Mrs. Loisel initially found out that the necklace, which she presumed was very expensive, was missing she was struck with panic, and most likely her heart was beating fast. With adrenaline, the hormone produced by the adrenal glands in the brain, running through her body, her fight or flight response was engaged. In this particular situation she chose flight, ultimately choosing to lie to Madame Forestier (Gary Tedman, 2009). So as a whole it wasn’t primarily Mrs. Loisel’s fault because she wasn’t, and most particularly couldn’t, control her actions since the thing leading them were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In addition, after the party she noticed she had lost the necklace, so she had to buy a replacement for her fiend so her friend wouldn't know that she had lost it. “After 10 years they made good of everything including the various rates and compound interests” after she worked for something that she bought she felt good, she was humbled because she never had to work for anything because her husband would buy her whatever she wanted(340). She was…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We find out after she sees her friend 10 years later. Loisel is harshly hit with the truth after ten years of working hard to pay their debts because of a necklace. She finds out when she sees her friend and decides to confess, when she does, she is told “Oh. my poor, poor Mathilde! Mine was false, It was worth five hundred francs at the most!”…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She had so much pride and high self worth in herself that she was unaware of others who would trade lives in a heartbeat. When Madame Loisel had lost the necklace her friend had let her borrow she did not confront her. Instead, she went out of her way to hide the fact that…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Madam Loisel Analysis

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In general, humans want to be happy. To not worry about food, shelter, clothes; to make ends meet. But people who already has these things want more. They want to let people know, friends especially, that they have things that ordinary people don't or just others in general. Humans are so driven by societies image, they forget who they truly are.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While having such a wonderful time, it was known later that the borrowed diamond was missing. The Loisels were flabbergasted, searching everywhere. Because of Mathilde’s pride, she refused to confess to her friend, fearing being scolded…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having to replace a diamond necklace led to her downfall even more so than what miserable life she was already living. If she just could have been satisfied with her life she would not have had to suffer so…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another aspect of irony in the story is that although the necklace was supposed to make her look more stunning, because of it, she lost her attractiveness. Madame Loisel ends up losing her looks due to hard labor. “‘Oh! Oh, my poor Mathilde, how you’ve changed!’” (Maupassant 615) It is ironic that Madame Loisel tries to look well-off using the necklace, but ends up losing all of her money because of the necklace.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In her book, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life, Sissela Bok discusses moral and ethical principles for deceptive practices. Our discussion will begin with explanations of truthfulness and deception, as well as humans’ thought process when deciding whether to lie. We will continue with a thorough examination of traditional…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was only worth five hundred francs at most” (Maupassant p.380). In the end all Madame Forestier thought was that the necklace was cheap and worthless, yet to Mahilda not only the necklace…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Necklace Thesis

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We see going through the story that Mathilde lying keeps leading her to the wrong path. Mathilde lying ruined her life and caused great pain to her and her husband Monsieur who is a hard working clerks who tries his best to make his wife happy. In the story “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassan shows us why lying is not the right thing…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If I wanted to try to cover something up, I would have to follow through with what I said even if I didn't believe it because I know it’s not true. It would be easier to say the truth because it’s what’s morally right and it is what actually happened, so I would have to lie to myself in order for me to convince someone of my tall tale. I would not only be lying to someone else, but I would have to pay the price of lying to myself when trying to create a deception. When lying to oneself…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people say that telling the truth does more harm than good; yet if someone went around asking people whether they would want to know the truth rather than a lie most people’s answer would be truth. But why is this? Yes, the truth can bring peacefulness to one’s mind, but at the same time it can destroy a person completely. In “The Jewelry”, by Guy de Maupassant, through the marriage and death of M. Lantin’s first wife the reader sees the pros and cons of M. Lentin realizing the truth about his wife.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an ideal world, you shouldn’t have to choose, but both of these stories aren’t told in an ideal world, much the opposite. Would Madame Loisel rather not know she wasted ten years of her life paying off a debt that wasn’t real or is she glad she knows? I would be very hard pressed to know that the necklace was a fake after all that time, some things are better left unknown. Maybe the past ten years was good for her since she finally became the middle-class wife she was intended to be all along. I think this question is much different than The Jewels.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Her selfish ways prevent her from enjoying her relationships with her husband and her friend. Visiting her friend of a higher class was a reminder of what she did not have and she always left her rich friend’s home holding hands with a green-eyed monster, only returning home to weep. (Maupassant 6). Before needing to borrow jewels, she had stopped going to see her Madame Forester completely because of her self-pity. This gives us the impression that Madame Loisel is not as concerned with her friend and their friendship as she is with what personal profit or pleasure she receives from the relationship.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mathilde’s character was prideful and instead of admitting she lost it; she order the necklace, and paid thirty-six thousand francs. Mathilde’s character never took responsibility for her prideful ways; furthermore, she blamed her friend, Madame Forestier for the misfortune. Her stubbornness and pride, resulted in negative effects for her and her family. She spent several years paying for the consequences of her pride. Perhaps, if she would have confronted the situation with bravery, she would have avoided the ten years of heartaches and additional work.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays