Mr Acuna Research Paper

Improved Essays
The recent trials on Robert Acuna shocked the whole world when they had discovered that he was on the death penalty. As the author, Adam Liptak stated Mr. Acuna was a high school student, and he was responsible for the death of two elderly neighbors. Since he was capable of committing such a heinous crime the jurors treated him like an adult. Even though Mr. Acuna was below the age of 18 they penalized him in a much more lenient way. As the jurors compared Mr. Acuna to James and Joyce Carroll's crime caused the juror's to be more lenient to Mr. Acuna. Due to Mr. Acuna erratic behavior, it gave him a bad reputation and caused him to get the death penalty. When Mr. Acuna had been put on death penalty he was not showing any remorse as his mother states. Mr. Acuna mother, Renee Magee agreed that he was a harsh person as he laughed at inappropriate things. His mother believed that harsh behavior had played a big role in his sentence from the jurors. Due to his age, he was the seventy-second person to be sentenced to death that is under the age of 18.But the main issue is that the plummeting number of death sentences that leads to juveniles. While other people agree that the punishments are described to harsh for underage juveniles. But some …show more content…
Thus Justice Scalia said that it doesn't surprise me that the death penalty for sixteen to eighteen year old is rarely improvised. Factors also led it to adolescent's reckless behavior and the diminishing responsibility. As the youth of Christopher Simmons shows that it could be a double edged sword as his age can benefit him while his actions do the opposite. As the juror prosecuted him they found him guilty because he was it was a mitigating factor. Thus Mr.Acuna appearance had played a role since he looks like a young teen that surprised the jurors because of his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Roper versus Simmons, the question at hand is whether the execution of a human being who was17 years old when he committed a murder violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). These Amendments forbid the obligation of the death penalty for those who suffered from a mental disability and who were insane should be prohibited from a sentence of capital punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). According to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it was lawful to execute a juvenile delinquent who was 15 years older but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). Roper versus Simmons paved the way in the judicial…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simmons, I disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in favor of Simmons. I believe that Simmons deserves the death penalty, there was no reason in Simmons’ claims and agreement about how the execution of minors violate the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Yet, the defendant premeditated the crime and did not consider the victims’ life. The defendant enters into the victim’s home, robbed the victim, then tied up the victim and threw the victim off a bridge. In addition, the defendant stated that he assured that he would get away with the crime because he was minor.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Constitution has given the accused the rights to a fair trial,to assembly,petition,self defense, and to vote. The Constitution also says there will not be excess bail or fines and no cruel and unusual punishment such as the Roper v Simmons case. The trial took three years to resolve the person who was of 16 years of age at the beginning of the trial and once it was resolved was 18 would not be given the death penalty. So in the end the death penalty will not be put under the age of 18 even if they turn 18 by the end of the trial.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reasons for the new ruling were explained by “evolving standards of decency” (Steinberg &Lawrence). It was understood that capital punishment for minors is inconsistent with the present norms of morality and humanity and cannot be justified on any conditions. The research was cited in the court room proving that under age criminals often lack maturity and are gullible in their character. The same research showed that the teenage defendants did not have the fully-developed (fully-fledged) sense of responsibility and thus some condescension in treatment of them is needed (Steinberg…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruled, “Capital punishment must be limited to offenders who commit a narrow category of the most serious crimes and extreme culpability makes them deserving of execution.” www.casebriefs.com This is due to the fact that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. They are also more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures. The courts also noted that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as an adult.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locked Away Forever Summary The theme of the article is that “Life without parole for teens who committed murder is a cruel and unusual punishment. “A lot of people would just think “That’s what they get” of “They deserve to be looked away forever” without realizing that teens make poor decision and mistakes without thinking about the consequences, we have all been there as a teen and made bad decisions. This article “Locked away forever” was about teen form the ages to 13 to 17 making poor decision and facing the outcome of their decision without parole.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In society today, an individual’s identity plays a major role and it also gives an encrypting reason for the injustices that occur within our criminal system. According to Mr. Stevenson, an individual is more likely to be convicted based on their identity in the United States Criminal Justice system than their manner of innocents. Yet, justice should be served on whether an individual is actually deemed as guilty of the crime committed. In 1972, prisoners were estimated to the amount of 300,000. As of 2012, the prison system has been estimated to increase to about 2,300,000 prisoners and still showcases a continual increase in society today (Power of Identity).…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A pastor in Nairobi talked about the importance of going through the process of mourning and then forgiving her offenders after she was gang-raped, stabbed, and left for dead on the day she was supposed to walk down the aisle as a bride. Terry Apudo was supposed to marry her then fiancé Harry in a grand ceremony at the All Saints Cathedral in Nairobi, Kenya. The night before their special day, she realized that some of Harry’s clothes were with her, but a friend offered to help her out. At dawn, she accompanied that friend to the bus station, not knowing that tragedy would strike her on her way home, the BBC details.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article Death Penalty for Teens, Frank W. Heft JR thinks that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for teens. While David Smith thinks that the death penalty for teens is not cruel and unusual punishment, they both have different views points about this matter and they do not agree. Heft and Smith disagree on juvenile capital punishment in three different areas, physical maturity which includes age, state law versus federal law, and emotional maturity that refers to the ability to understand, and manage their emotions and the ability to respond to the environment in the appropriate manner. Because of their disagreement on age maturity, and emotional maturity, federal law and states law, it leaves the reader undecided…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Equity Framework

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Lamentably, handguns are a gigantic factor in adolescent brutality these days. A different equity framework was set up, for minors that perpetuate wrongdoing years prior. The legal framework was executed, with the expectation of keeping adolescents that perpetuate wrongdoing from enduring harder disciplines as grown-ups and to help restore them exclusively on the young equity framework. Be that as it may, with the ascent in rough wrongdoings by youth a few courts are currently giving adolescents harsher condemning and furthermore putting incredible worry on the well-being of people in general. In either case, the preeminent court of the U. S. decided that death penalty for a person that had conferred an offense that was less than 18 years old was merciless and strange discipline and was likewise taboo by the Constitution.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many opinions on juveniles being convicted as adults on the crimes they have committed. When it comes to some of these harsh crimes, who could not punish the individual to the fullest? It does not matter how old a person is because everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. If someone is raised differently and believes it is okay to murder another human, than they cannot just change their mindset. An individual that makes and adult decision should have the same consequences.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis I will be analyzing, "The Supreme Court Says Again: Juveniles Are Different”, a 7 paragraph article written by the Editorial Board and published to the New York Times on January 25, 2016. In discussions of The Supreme Court’s repeated ruling over the last decade, it has become a controversial issue that it is morally and constitutionally wrong to equate offenses committed by emotionally undeveloped adolescents with crimes carried out by adults. While some argue that no matter what age, if a person where to do something so cruel, for example, kill someone, they should be entitled to life in prison.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evan Miller has had a rough upbringing. He has had emotional abandonment from his alcoholic and drug abused mother, his abusive father and forced to be placed in multiple foster cares throughout his childhood. Miller is a prime example of an abandoned, troubled minor, whose true destiny has been destroyed due to these circumstances. The problems he has faced steered him to being depressed and unsatisfied, using drugs, alcohol and four suicide attempts to trying and fulfill the emptiness he has been feeling his entire life.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays