What is leadership? Leadership may be defined in several different manners. However, putting it on simple term, Leadership is one’s ability to provoke motivation of a person, group of people, and/ or organization to act towards achieving a common goal. No two people posse the same leadership ability thus making each person’s leadership capacity a style. There exist several unique leadership styles. Autocratic Leadership is when the boss solely makes decision without any input from subordinates and said leader distributes the information with little room for flexibility. Democratic Leadership revolves around the input and knowledge of subordinates where delegation of duties is vital. Strategic Leadership does not show preference to those in
…show more content…
The first principle states that the command must create cohesion thru mutual trust. This simply means that teams, subordinates, and/or personnel must obtain trust for those he or she are working with both leadership and subordinates in order for the Philosophy to success. The second principle is to create a shared understanding, which is the ability to have all personnel to be focus on the same mission and goals. Principle three is to provide a clear intent from the commander. This intent must be specific, direct, and plainly state what the commander wants performed. The fourth Principle is to execution of disciplined initiative. This means that the exercise must have organization and obey the code of behavior given when orders have not been provided or do not apply to the current situation. Use mission orders is the fifth principle which provides guidance or the outcomes to be reached, but not step by step direction on how to achieve them. The sixth principle is the acceptance of prudent risk. If the commander deems it worthy, then there shall be exposure to potential loss, injury, or other vulnerabilities in order discover the flaws of the enemy (ADP …show more content…
Leadership is not the same from on leader to the next nor will it be the same from commander to commander. One person’s ideal leader may in fact be another person concept of toxic leadership. The use of the six principles brings about the use of balance between leadership styles. Some of the commander’s decision are basic upon information he or she obtain from his subordinates which resembles a democratic leadership and other decision he or she may believe do not require inclusion such as autocratic leadership. All United States leadership regardless of the leadership role or title must possess cross cultural leadership simply because the United States prides it’s self on being a multicultural nation. All commanders must possess charismatic leadership in order to accomplish the second principle of creating shared understanding. Team leadership is displayed visually in the clear commander’s intent. Facilitative leadership and Laissez-Fair leadership are expressed the exercise of discipline initiative because the group or team must achieve the goal in the absence of orders leaving the effectiveness of the mission on the groups efficacy while giving them the power. Coaching and Visionary leadership reflect the building of cohesion and mutual trust in the first
The first principle states that the command must create cohesion thru mutual trust. This simply means that teams, subordinates, and/or personnel must obtain trust for those he or she are working with both leadership and subordinates in order for the Philosophy to success. The second principle is to create a shared understanding, which is the ability to have all personnel to be focus on the same mission and goals. Principle three is to provide a clear intent from the commander. This intent must be specific, direct, and plainly state what the commander wants performed. The fourth Principle is to execution of disciplined initiative. This means that the exercise must have organization and obey the code of behavior given when orders have not been provided or do not apply to the current situation. Use mission orders is the fifth principle which provides guidance or the outcomes to be reached, but not step by step direction on how to achieve them. The sixth principle is the acceptance of prudent risk. If the commander deems it worthy, then there shall be exposure to potential loss, injury, or other vulnerabilities in order discover the flaws of the enemy (ADP …show more content…
Leadership is not the same from on leader to the next nor will it be the same from commander to commander. One person’s ideal leader may in fact be another person concept of toxic leadership. The use of the six principles brings about the use of balance between leadership styles. Some of the commander’s decision are basic upon information he or she obtain from his subordinates which resembles a democratic leadership and other decision he or she may believe do not require inclusion such as autocratic leadership. All United States leadership regardless of the leadership role or title must possess cross cultural leadership simply because the United States prides it’s self on being a multicultural nation. All commanders must possess charismatic leadership in order to accomplish the second principle of creating shared understanding. Team leadership is displayed visually in the clear commander’s intent. Facilitative leadership and Laissez-Fair leadership are expressed the exercise of discipline initiative because the group or team must achieve the goal in the absence of orders leaving the effectiveness of the mission on the groups efficacy while giving them the power. Coaching and Visionary leadership reflect the building of cohesion and mutual trust in the first