The facts above stated that the defendant “maintains an internet website that is accessible from California—indeed, it is accessible worldwide. The website includes a partial listing of the dealership's inventory and invites potential customers to contact the dealership by email, by telephone, or in person to discuss the cars available for sale; it has no other interactive features.” Due to the similar fact patterns this could would hold the same ruling as the court of Abdouch v. Lopez. Abdouch held that a website that is in the middle of interactive and passive will not establish minimum contracts. Overall, the plaintiff case for establishing minimum contacts rest attaching in personam jurisdiction to the agents within the state. The court takes the analyze of specific jurisdiction one step further. If or once minimum contracts are establish the court will consider 5 factors: 1. Is there a burden on the defendant; 2. Does the forum state’s interest in adjudicating dispute; 3. Does the plaintiff has a interest in obtaining relief; 4. Is there interstate system’s interest in the efficient resolution of disputes;
The facts above stated that the defendant “maintains an internet website that is accessible from California—indeed, it is accessible worldwide. The website includes a partial listing of the dealership's inventory and invites potential customers to contact the dealership by email, by telephone, or in person to discuss the cars available for sale; it has no other interactive features.” Due to the similar fact patterns this could would hold the same ruling as the court of Abdouch v. Lopez. Abdouch held that a website that is in the middle of interactive and passive will not establish minimum contracts. Overall, the plaintiff case for establishing minimum contacts rest attaching in personam jurisdiction to the agents within the state. The court takes the analyze of specific jurisdiction one step further. If or once minimum contracts are establish the court will consider 5 factors: 1. Is there a burden on the defendant; 2. Does the forum state’s interest in adjudicating dispute; 3. Does the plaintiff has a interest in obtaining relief; 4. Is there interstate system’s interest in the efficient resolution of disputes;