Mill's Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
Mill’s utilitarianism theory is based on the consequences of actions. The principle of that theory is that an end most be happiness. To achieve that end, in Mill’s view, right actions must be done constructing the best possible outcome; or in other words, right actions lead to incite the greatest happiness. But, what is happiness? Mill’s defines happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain. Vice versa, unhappiness is pain or unpleased; this reverse of happiness is acquired by doing wrong actions.
Furthermore, Mill’s argues that pleasure has quality and quantity; depending on people’s goals and ends the two variables can differ. Meaning, some pleasures are better than others. For example, an action can have good consequences nonetheless still

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vital to utilitarianism is Mill’s theory of morality relies on consequentialism. The idea of consequentialism exhibits the idea that with every action, the morality of that action relies in the results or the consequences. An action could serve as either a mean to more pleasure, or a mean to greater pain. Either way, the action serves as a mean to the greater or lesser outcome. Therefore, whatever actions serves as a mean to the greatest happiness must be declared as the moral action.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill aims to show that happiness is the only thing that humans ever desire. He acknowledges, though, that humans desire virtue just as authentically as we desire happiness, although less frequently than we desire happiness. This appears to reveal a problem with the kind of utilitarianism that Mill is presenting. If humans desire virtue and if virtue is something other than happiness, then happiness is not the sole object of human desire.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hello everyone! This is a utilitarian argument because the argument towards Ashley’s treatment was based on trying to prevent the most amount of discomfort (pain), and maximizing her lifetime happiness and comfort (pleasure). This is the hedonistic way of the utilitarian belief. They employed questions from the hedonistic calculus.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill questions the validity of the core doctrine of the utilitarianism, which holds that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. " In his philosophical inquiry, he strives to define what defines the ultimate happiness and pleasure. Contrary to Bentham, the proponent of the classical utilitarianism, who believes that all sources of pleasure are equal in value, Mill asserts that the quality of pleasure is a major factor in deciding what would be the best course of actions. Mill differentiates various types of pleasure inherent to the humankind, identifying physical satisfaction from fulfilling vital needs, aesthetic enjoyment of the surrounding beauty, and intellectual pleasures or sense of accomplishment.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is choosing the action that promotes the most happiness. This ethical theory is not the same as egoism because instead of thinking about your own happiness, you’d be thinking about the happiness of all. However, many people argue that utilitarianism is too demanding because it requires you to consider everyone’s happiness and do what brings the most happiness to the majority. For example, imagine that you work everyday, live alone and have no family or friends. If you were to give up your paycheck, you would be able to feed a whole family of 5 even if that means you would go hungry.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mill o One part of James Mill’s utilitarianism is stated as, “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (151). o If one looks at this part of the theory, then James Mill’s view on the illegality more than likely would be that it is morally unsound to prevent patients from getting what they need because the product makes them happy. o He would say the action of preventing the product to be legally obtained is not right because as stated, actions are right when they produce happiness, not the opposite. o In addition to the actions are right perspective, James Mill also said, “Pleasure, and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends” (151).…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we routinely differentiate between hedonism as a theory of the good and utilitarianism as a consequentialist theory of the right. Mill, however, considered both doctrines to be so closely intertwined that he used the term ‘utilitarianism’ to signify both theories. On the one hand, he says that the “utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end.” (CW 10, 234) On the other hand, he defines utilitarianism as a moral theory according to which “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness…”…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism’s consequentialist theory’s foundation bases its judgment only on the consequences of the action. According to John Stuart Mill, the basic principle of utility or “the greatest happiness principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (MacKinnon & Fiala, 2015, p. 104). These actions are judged by the extent to which they produce happiness or avoid unhappiness for all. A morally right action would be one that produces or tends to produce happiness without pain and ultimately be the desired result of all actions. A morally wrong action would be one that brings pain or denies pleasure.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He explains both “higher pleasures” and “lower pleasures”. We talked in class and we get a good understanding from the texts that to best understand these pleasures, experience of both is helpful. However, if two people have experienced both of these types of pleasures and they do not agree on which is more desirable, where do we go from there? Pleasures help us define a morally correct action. Mill tries to answer this question by proposing a formula to solve this issue.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of Bentham’s quantitative measurement, Mill emphasized the quality of happiness over the quantity. "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He states, “if the greatest happiness of all is the end of human action, it must be the standard of morality.” (11) Opponents to this theory state that happiness is unattainable, and humans can do without it. Mill responds to this by clarifying that utilitarianism is not only the pursuit of happiness, but “the prevention of lessening happiness.” (11) Therefore, Mill concludes that utilitarianism is more necessary if happiness is unattainable.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays