Obedience According To Dr. Stanley Milgram's Study

Improved Essays
Obedience is a form of social influence where a person acts in response to a direct order from another individual who is an authoritative figure. Sometime the order violates their morals and ethical codes. According to Dr. Stanley Milgram, people obey ether out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative even when acting against the own better judgement and desire. Dr. Milgram a psychologist at Yale University desires was to investigate scientifically how people could be capable of doing great harm to other, if they are ordered to do so, by a person in authority. Dr. Milgram came up with an experiment that focuses on why people have the tendency to obey authoritative figures. In order for Dr. Milgram to study the behavior, he designed …show more content…
The teacher and researcher went into the room next door that contained the electric shock generator box. The generator has a row of switches marked from 15 volts (Slight Shock) to 375 volts (Danger: Severe Shock) to 450 volts. The teacher (subject) would read the list of words and then test the learner’s (confederate) memory. The experimenter would administer an electric shock each time the learner (confederate) responded incorrectly. The subjects (teachers) were unaware that shocks were not really being delivered, and the learner (confederate) was just acting. The confederate’s responses were programmed to be correct or wrong in the same sequence for all the subjects. As the amount of voltage increased with incorrect answers, the learner (confederate) began to shout in discomfort. After 300 voltages, the learner became completely silent and refused to answer any more question. The teacher was instructed to treat this lack of response as an incorrect response, and whenever the subject (teacher) turned to the experimenter for guidance, he would order the subject to continue. The measure of obedience was taken by recording the level of shock at which subject refused to continue. However, since there were only 30 switches on the generator, each subject (teacher) received a score of 0 to 30. In the completion of the experiment, all subjects were debriefed on the study, because of the …show more content…
Milgram discovers that physical and emotional distance of the victim from the teacher. He discovered that when the victim is in a different room with the teacher. The obedience level was 90% but when the victim was in the same room with the teacher. The obedience level dropped down to 30%. The closer the experimenter is with the teacher, the greater the obedience. However, when the participants were allowed to punish the learner by using any lever of shock, no one ever pressed any switch higher than 45 volt. In conclusion, the fate of our obedience still remains under the influence of today’s society. The experiment may have been a fake, and no one actually received a shock. Is it ethical that human are willing to shock someone, possibly to death because a person in authority figure tells you to do so? The answer to the question is probably people may obey out of fear, or they want to appear to be cooperative certain situation. Dr. Milgram’s experiment may not have delivered the actual shock treatment to the participants. However, it was extremely influential in our understanding of obedience.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    On the animation or slideshow, there were three main participants which were the authority,the teacher and student. The authority encouraged the teacher to conduct the acts of the experiment as to the student is responsible for memorizing the words. If the student fails, he is then shocked with a progression of high volts. This experiment can be discussed as both ethical and unethical . The people volunteered and were advised of the process which would make the experiment ethical.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals are from Mars and conservative from Venus. The main theme of Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences is to present the reader with how neither is better than the other, but different. The book focuses on the analysis on how biology determines our political views and inclinations. John R. Hibbings, Kevin B. Smith and Jon R. Alford are the authors of Predisposed. As biopoliticians, they provide evidence of people’s view and how it differs based on biology.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1 The Milgram study was done with the objection of finding out whether obedience for from an authoritative figure was a common occurrence, for example, the killing of Jews by Nazis. Therefore, how long were subjects willing to inflict pin on another person when asked to, despite knowing the seriousness of the injuries. From the experiment, the experimenter established routine through the use of the predefined prods such as ‘please go on and please continue (Myers & Twenge, 2017).’ That way the subject would know what to do when they would hear these words.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    At the beginning of the study the two participants were introduced to each other and were told and led to believe that this experiment was examining the effects of punishment on learning. Although the teacher did not know it, the experiment was rigged meaning that it was Pre planned. Mr Wallace knew the purpose of the experiment and would always be the learner when the paper was pulled out of the hat. The naive participant didn’t know that the experiment was truly looking at how ordinary individuals obey authority figures, even if it means harming another human being. In this case an “electric shock”.…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the couple rounds, the majority of the students answered incorrectly so the experimenter could observe the one who was not in on the experiment. This person “is placed in a position in which, while...giving the correct answers, finds himself unexpectedly in a minority of one” (Asch 144). Asch finds that many, but not all, of the actual subjects will answer incorrectly with the majority because they feel pressured into doing…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Shermer in “What Milgram’s Shock Experiment Really Meant” describes the obedience as being fueled by fear and the unknown of what may happen to the participant. Saul Mcleod wrote “Obedience to Authority” and he also expresses that fear is a key factor. In “What Milgram’s Shock Experiment Really Meant”, Shermer conducted an experiment of an exact replica of Milgram’s shock experiment. One of his test subjects, Lateefah, was stopped in the middle of her experiment because she was considerably uncomfortable.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment was designed to study the effect of punishment on learning. The learner was conducted into a separate room strapped to fake miniature electrical chair to prevent excessive movement. The teacher is told to read a pair of sample words and the learner must recite them without any errors. If a mistake was made the teacher must send electric shock to the learner’s chair that ranges from 15- 450 volts. Each mistake made causes the teacher to increase the shock intensity.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Milgram’s essay “The Perils of Obedience,” he states “the real focus of the experiment is the teacher” (692). During the process there was a teacher, student, and experimenter, the students were hired actors. The experiment consisted of the teacher giving the student words in which the learner had to repeat them back, and if they got them wrong they would be shocked and the voltage would elevate with each wrong answer. Throughout the process and various teachers, Milgram saw different reactions, only one stood up for the learner refusing to proceed based on the learner’s reactions, another laughed uncontrollably, and the rest followed orders with no remorse regardless of how the student reacted (Milgram 695). Milgram’s point was “to extricate himself from this plight, the subject must make a clear break with authority” (693).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This group of well-educated individuals included psychiatrists, middle class adults, and faculty members in the human behavioral sciences (1). They held a general consensus: Only one or two of the forty men would likely administer at least 300 volts to the learner, and none of the men (or “only a pathological fringe of about one in a thousand,” as Milgram wrote in his article, “The Perils of Obedience”) would pull the last switches labeled “XXX” (1). These assumptions could not have been further from the truth. Twenty-five of the 40 men continued the experiment to the very end, even after listening to the learner’s shouts of protest, agonized screaming, and, ultimately, ominous silence…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experimenter in Milgram’s study was present in the same room where a participant was performing his task. Moreover, if the participant expressed doubts regarding further continuation, the experimenter would encourage him to continue four times using phrases such as ‘Please continue’ or ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue’ (1963 cited in Banyard, 2012). In Hofling et al.’s experiment the authority commanded the participants through a telephone and asked them to carry out the order before the authority arrived to the hospital. As the further Milgram’s research on different variations of his experiment shows, the presence of an authority is an important factor increasing the impact of obedience to…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s study discovered great psychological data. Experiment Context In 1961, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted the first obedience…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Visual Cliff Analysis

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the article, the shocks got so severe that the learner would bang on the wall for the teacher to hear. The teacher was not able to stop. The point of the experiment was to see how long a person would go shocking someone even though that person is getting hurt and…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience investigating participants' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays