Milgram Experiment: Study Linked Between Obedience And Behavior

Improved Essays
Milgram Experiment Reflection Paper
In May 1967, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram was leading a study linked between obedience and behavior. The experiment involved the experimenter, teacher and the learner. The experimenter would then prompt the teacher to give the learner different levels of shock. The level of shocks ranged from slight shock which was 15v to a shock that transmitted volts as powerful as 450v danger severe shock. The experiment included 40 males the ages ranging between 20 years old to 50 years old. The level of the shock from a shock generator with 30 switches would increase depending whether the learner gave the correct answer or not. The study was to determine if the teacher (participant) would obey the orders given to him to shock the learner for every incorrect answer the shocks would gradually increase.
After reading the study I was not surprised by the results. The reason why I was not surprised because people are usually very compliant when it comes to authority figures. When someone is in a higher position of authority they view them as having power and control. Humans learn from a young age that you must listen and obey someone displaying authority. We obey those of authority to avoid undesirable consequences that most likely would be brought against us for going against what
…show more content…
They would have had a harder time continuing with the shocks if they were in the same room together. Although they could hear the learner screaming when shocked depending on the level of volts that was delivered, I think it was easier for them to carry out the punishment. Nonetheless, this experiment was mainly for testing obedience and I believe people are more obedient if the person taking charge looks more in charge. For example, the person in charge in this experiment wore a lab coat and looked like an authority figure, so the people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, this is a largely simplistic view of the results of the experiments. The participants did not simply obey the person of authority named the experimenter. As demonstrated in the extensive video footage of the experiments, many of them exhibited great distress and tension, attempted to refuse participation, and tried to reason with the experimenter (Milgram, 1962). While it can be argued that a reasonable person could simply exit the room to leave or to check on the other participant receiving the shocks, the situation prevented this action, not physically, but psychologically. In turn, it may be argued that rather than obedience to orders, the participants of this study succumbed to incessant…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1 The Milgram study was done with the objection of finding out whether obedience for from an authoritative figure was a common occurrence, for example, the killing of Jews by Nazis. Therefore, how long were subjects willing to inflict pin on another person when asked to, despite knowing the seriousness of the injuries. From the experiment, the experimenter established routine through the use of the predefined prods such as ‘please go on and please continue (Myers & Twenge, 2017).’ That way the subject would know what to do when they would hear these words.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although they fully had the ability to stop inflicting harm on the learner despite the requests of the experimenter, many of the participants, across the various experiments with differing circumstances, demonstrated a willingness to go to the full 450 volts regardless of the protests of the learner. In the 1963 Milgram experiment, over two-thirds of the participants reached the full 450 volts, with all of the participants reaching 300 volts. Therefore, the experiment concluded with the fact that ordinary people are fully capable of going against their morals and inflicting fatal harm on someone else just from obedience to an authority. The Milgram experiment was able to reach its objectives of determining the effect obedience to authority had on the level of cruelty that the German soldiers demonstrated by collecting data on how far on the voltage scale ordinary people were willing to go. The more professional the experimenter looked, their presence nearby the learner, and the prestige of the experiment location all impacted how willing the participants were to inflict harm.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His experiment included a teacher (the subject), a student (an actor), and an ominous “torture” machine which the subjects were told could give shocks up to 450 volts. The teacher gave the questions verbally to the student. If the student answered incorrectly the teacher had to shock them with the machine even though there was actually no shock given. The teachers had to increase the voltage for each wrong answer given in some variations of the experiment, in others they could choose whichever voltage they wanted. The student/actor would purposely give incorrect answers now and then and would act in pain whenever he was “shocked.”…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They actually believed they were shocking the learners for not knowing the right answer. To me, I feel like the participants were being made a fool out of. What if they were actually hurting those people by going up in volts? They were so pressed on following orders, they didn’t care they could hurt or even kill a human being. Another issue that was unethical was the urge for the participants to continue.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment was designed to study the effect of punishment on learning. The learner was conducted into a separate room strapped to fake miniature electrical chair to prevent excessive movement. The teacher is told to read a pair of sample words and the learner must recite them without any errors. If a mistake was made the teacher must send electric shock to the learner’s chair that ranges from 15- 450 volts. Each mistake made causes the teacher to increase the shock intensity.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Milgram’s essay “The Perils of Obedience,” he states “the real focus of the experiment is the teacher” (692). During the process there was a teacher, student, and experimenter, the students were hired actors. The experiment consisted of the teacher giving the student words in which the learner had to repeat them back, and if they got them wrong they would be shocked and the voltage would elevate with each wrong answer. Throughout the process and various teachers, Milgram saw different reactions, only one stood up for the learner refusing to proceed based on the learner’s reactions, another laughed uncontrollably, and the rest followed orders with no remorse regardless of how the student reacted (Milgram 695). Milgram’s point was “to extricate himself from this plight, the subject must make a clear break with authority” (693).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The learner was then taken to a room and had an electrical “shocking machine” attached to him or…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two psychological experimenters attempted to uncover the most brutal area of the human brain in their articles: Milgram 's "The Perils of Obedience" and Zimbardo 's "The Stanford Prison Experiment". The first and earliest of these experimenters was Stanley Milgram, who conducted his experiments at Yale University. He starts the article with information on testing whether or not a person would administer painful—and eventually lethal—shocks to other people when given the order by an authoritative person in the room with the ‘teacher’. His results were indeed surprising: twenty-five people out of forty administered lethal shocks when instructed. He includes excerpts from the experiment to add to his argument.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This group of well-educated individuals included psychiatrists, middle class adults, and faculty members in the human behavioral sciences (1). They held a general consensus: Only one or two of the forty men would likely administer at least 300 volts to the learner, and none of the men (or “only a pathological fringe of about one in a thousand,” as Milgram wrote in his article, “The Perils of Obedience”) would pull the last switches labeled “XXX” (1). These assumptions could not have been further from the truth. Twenty-five of the 40 men continued the experiment to the very end, even after listening to the learner’s shouts of protest, agonized screaming, and, ultimately, ominous silence…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The phenomenon of obedience to authority was found both among average people and professional group to which people’s health and life is entrusted commonly. The selection of participants was not the only methodological difference between the…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Visual Cliff Analysis

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the article, the shocks got so severe that the learner would bang on the wall for the teacher to hear. The teacher was not able to stop. The point of the experiment was to see how long a person would go shocking someone even though that person is getting hurt and…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience investigating participants' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays