Michael Sandel's Criticism Of Markets

Great Essays
We live in an era where markets pervade every aspect of our life. Markets exist to facilitate the exchange of goods and service between people, so that markets ultimately serve to transfer goods and services. It is certainly true that the commodification of all aspects of society is an increasingly worrisome trend since everything that is traded must be priced in some way. Markets are not only a means for distributing goods and services, that they also shape our culture, foster or impede the development of human capacities, and sustain or undermine valuable forms of human relationship. Therefore, morality of the market is important as it is in a free society nowadays. The major strength of political philosopher Michael Sandel’s criticisms is …show more content…
I think Sandel 's own response is perfectly accurate because it is not a question of markets good or bad. It is about some things money can’t buy, and things shouldn’t actually be bought and sold in markets; also, moral boundaries should constrain market forces. First of all, in today 's society, people seek to make more money and grow their wealth, but even the richest people aren 't happy. Therefore, money is not the ultimate solutions, and many things that money can’t buy. Rules of the market simply do not apply to friendships, true love, Nobel prizes, and many other areas of life such as respect, time, or happiness. Money may destroy thing it is intended to buy. Friendship is a priceless and value gift, it is also worth infinitely more than money. Thus, it cannot be bought or sold. As Sandel points out, we all understand that if I pay you money to spend time with me, we are not friends. Also, it cannot buy love. Love has to be given freely from one person to another and must be based on …show more content…
However, there are many things money can’t buy and shouldn’t buy in markets, so moral boundaries should compel market forces since it makes better communal lives. I believe that Sandel is right to worry about the cost to the communities of reducing everything to a price and cultural consequences of markets because it is unfair , corruption, and degrading values of goods. If money is the necessary means to obtaining certain goods, or a certain quality of goods, then the poor will be systematically disadvantaged in the marketplace. In addition, it is hard to deny some moral value to the market because no social system can survive for long without a moral basis. Valuing certain goods in money terms can corrupt their nature by depriving them of some essential dignity. Moral and ethical position that would hold eternal human values like sharing, caring, gifting, relationship, and generosity which money cannot buy. Once we understand the way markets and morality influence one another, we can try to develop strategies to help the markets promote the values we hold precious, and change practices that are inconsistent with our

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    THE OTHER SIDE OF SANDEL’S COIN In contemporary society, money can buy almost anything from access to an express line of an amusement park to a permanent residence in the United States. In his discussion of selective examples, Sandel argues that putting a price tag everything creates inequality based on income, and morally corrupts their inherent value. However, this theory fails to take into account the inequality that is already present in our world and instead romanticizes the definition of morality in his provincial ideology. If people continue to hold Sandel’s dogmatic view, our market economy that has led to huge prosperity would come to a halt and widen the social disparity that already exists in our society.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    PROMPT ONE It is apparent that in the work of Kendall (2015) that he values defining morality and virtue as different rather than as similar. In Morality and Capitalism: A Dialogue on Freedom, Kendall differentiates morality and virtue with various examples and stating that while something might be moral it might not be virtuous. For example, Kendall gives an example of someone being bullied and the witness not intervening. Kendall views this as moral but not vitreous.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Chapter Four of What Money Can't Buy, Michael Sandel analyzes the market in life and death. Sandel provides evidence of how the markets impact a person's life. In this chapter, Sandel argues that life and death become an object of money. The two issues Sandel brings in this chapter are, Janitor's Insurance and Victicals. Sandel purpose is that trying to persuade people who think that markets are always a great thing.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the excerpt from Anti-Dühring entitled “Theoretical” by Friedrich Engels, Engels outlines the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the social and economic conflicts that have occurred in the past and even today due to this contradiction. He uses a historical materialist approach to analyze capitalism and the workings of the capitalist mode of production. It is in using a historical approach that the concept of capitalism becomes complex as well as very contradictory. This paper will introduce the concept of historical materialism and explain what Engels explains is the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and the two contradictions that arise from the fundamental contradiction. Furthermore this paper will provide an explanation…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gospel of Wealth Andrew Carnegie was the incarnation and manifestation of an ideal American Dream as he began his career as a replaceable servant and rose to power as he became a premier American Industrialist. Through years of hard work and determination he had finally become an established member of society when he started his Carnegie Steel Company. After attaining his massive wealth he published an essay in regards to the wealthy’s treatment of the laissez-faire, concerned about social and economic ideas of those who were not as well off as them. By focusing on the justification of laissez-faire capitalism and the assertion of philanthropic responsibilities to wealthy industrialists who profited from their exploitation of an unregulated economy, a certain etiquette was assumed by those who were financially stable.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I present Jan Narvesonʻs argument that no one should be morally required to assist those who are impoverished or starving. I will then object to this statement by arguing that those who are financially secure who are able to maintain comfortable lifestyles are morally obligated to distribute a portion of their wealth or excess food and supplies to those in need. My objection consists of two main arguments, the first being that those who are financially secure may be responsible for the impoverishment of others as a result of their consumption habits. The second component of my objection is that people should be morally obligated to distribute any excess money, food, or supplies they feel that they are able to because it would…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trade is the action of exchanging goods and services with others. Without trade, people in different parts of the world would be limited to the resources available locally. Seeing as some countries cannot support certain resources due to their climate, it is necessary to have a means of providing resources to places where they might be sparse. In her book, Factory Girls, Leslie T. Chang details the lives of young women working in the Dongguan factories in China.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Comparability In Famine, Affluence, and Morality by Peter Singer, he argues that we are morally obligated to donate as much money to charity as we can to help limit poverty in the world. Singer explains that there are many people in the world suffering from poverty, and living very poor-quality lives as a result of poverty. He argues that poverty is morally wrong because of the suffering it promotes. Singer believes it is the moral obligation of humans to donate as much as they can to help limit the suffering of the poor in the world, without sacrificing anything moral comparability. In this paper, I will argue that Singer uses vague language to describe what the line is for moral comparability.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “What Money Can’t Buy” written by Michael J. Sandel introduces the recent phenomena of the ever-growing market economy expanding into all realms of life. The author argues that within the market economy, the prevalence of unfairness and corruption are at an all-time high. Sandel goes on to introduce the reader’s to the extreme pace that non-market items are entering into the market economy, including some very absurd examples that make the readers question the morality of the market itself. Overall, Sandel did an exceptional job analyzing the current market system, as well as connecting the market with fairness, corruption, and morality.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sandel compares what money can and cannot buy in today’s society and the facts are shocking. With money buying everything from admission to prestigious universities to immigration to the United States it is easy to believe that money is the key to success. And that is exactly how mainstream culture defines it. Take a moment to imagine an extremely successful person in our society. Now what was that person like?…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Economic theory and its application to understanding real-world problems and events has public policy implications. Economic theorists have used the existence of facts that demonstrate a set of market failures, such as externalities, monopoly power, and public goods, to justify government intervention to correct such failures. However, a similar set of facts can also demonstrate the market’s failure to exist, meaning that the very government intervention that was implemented to correct for the alleged market failures prevents a market solution to such a failure from emerging. Before and since the publication of Ronald Coase’s “The Lighthouse in Economics” (1974), the extent to which the lighthouse is regarded as a public good (Samuelson 1954)…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Signs are a commonplace feature of daily life. A sign is defined as anything that can be used to represent something else. (Berger, 2013). Commodity signs are a crucial part of consumer culture. These signs can be found on websites, in advertisements or even in a company’s logo.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the world very much something people like, like real thing althought not real, but much needed by humans are is money could make them get something desirable and thinking of money and treasure that would make her happy that their minds today. In fact many things that are not only can be compared with the money and the treasure not all things can purchased with money though prices starting from the million even trillion it will not be able to buy it, is very needed by we as human beings .Who can’t live alone in the earth. They aware if they need but sometimes they ignored it for the sake of things that made him settle in term of the material but not necessarily make them happy in their heart.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics