That way of thinking is just absurd to me. I enjoy how researchers are able to find that depending on the section of the cerebral cortex that is damaged it will relate to what function of speech is damaged: “people with Wernicke’s aphasia can speak, what they say is completely incoherent…lesion in the left side…back of the brain” (Kandel 122). If the front of the brain is damaged people are unable to speak, but can comprehend. These two findings helped to show that the left hemisphere is for language. This chapter filled me in on a lot of new ideas and findings of memory and learning that I was previously unaware
That way of thinking is just absurd to me. I enjoy how researchers are able to find that depending on the section of the cerebral cortex that is damaged it will relate to what function of speech is damaged: “people with Wernicke’s aphasia can speak, what they say is completely incoherent…lesion in the left side…back of the brain” (Kandel 122). If the front of the brain is damaged people are unable to speak, but can comprehend. These two findings helped to show that the left hemisphere is for language. This chapter filled me in on a lot of new ideas and findings of memory and learning that I was previously unaware