Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Improved Essays
When a client files a claim for malpractice, it is the medical malpractice attorney's job to secure him or her damages for the pain and suffering which resulted from a doctor's negligence. In cases of death, the attorney attempts to college damages for the family of the deceased. This can be a complicated procedure, as malpractice laws and regulations, particularly the statute of limitations, may vary from state to state.

There are two types of damages available to victims of medical malpractice. A successful malpractice attorney may be able to secure the client both compensatory, as well as punitive, damages. Compensatory damages serve to financially compensate victims of medical malpractice for their own financial losses or damages that
…show more content…
These awards are not meant to compensate the victim, but more to punish the defendant and hopefully deter him or her (as well as the profession) from future misconduct. Punitive damages are more difficult to recover, as the malpractice attorney must prove obvious, reckless disregard for the safety of a patient. The doctor must have knowingly engaged in inappropriate dangerous behavior for punitive damages to be recovered.

Medical malpractice attorneys must be aware of the specific medical malpractice "statute of limitations" governing the state in which the incident occurred, before addressing each malpractice case. The statute of limitations refers to the length of time one can legally wait before filing a claim for medical malpractice. These lengths vary from state to state so it is important for both the client and the malpractice attorney to be aware of their individual state laws governing medical malpractice.

Oftentimes, in cases where malpractice attorneys are successful is producing compensatory and punitive damages for a client, malpractice payouts can reach into the millions or dollars, depending on how profound the suffering of the victim is determined to be. Obviously then it is in a victim's best interest to procure a medical malpractice attorney who is well-versed in the malpractice laws of the state where he or she resides.

Article Source:

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Define the following 25 legal terms: 1.HIPAA Privacy Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the privacy requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of HIPPA of 1996 and safeguard identifiable health information. ________________________ 2.HIPAA Security Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the security requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of the HIPPA 1996 ________________________ 3.Medical malpractice __A type of action in which the plaintiff must demonstrate that a physician-patient, nurse-patient, therapist-patient, or other healthcare provider-patient relationship existed at the time of the alleged wrongful act.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A civil suit is commonly derived from a private party or individual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital of Demopolis and the treating physicians Dr. F.S. Whitfield, Dr. Paul Ketcham and Dr. E.C. Brock (Defendant) for negligence of care.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When people undergo medical procedures, they put their lives in someone else’s hands. Though everyone deserves the highest standard of care, medical negligence is a very real problem around the country. If you sustained new or worse injuries because of a healthcare professional’s negligence, Cronin Fried Sekiya Kekina & Fairbanks in Honolulu, HI, will help. At Cronin Fried Sekiya Kekina & Fairbanks, they help clients pursue justice from doctors and hospitals for gross negligence and misconduct.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orr V. Bell Case Summary

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exceptional care and professional responsibility is a standard form of practice the general public rely upon for their health care needs. But, what happens when codes of conduct, rules and codes of ethics are violated and physicians fail to provide adequate care and diagnostics? When circumstance like this arise, who becomes responsible for the negligence on behalf of the patient? In the case of Orr vs. Bell, due to the negligence on behalf of Dr. Bell, the patient Orr went misdiagnosed and eventually became paralyzed. The review of this case will document and prove due to Dr. Bell’s failure to follow nationally recognized Radiologic ethics and rules Dr. Bell failed to determine Orr’s medical issue and therefore was responsible for the outcome…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence or Malpractice? The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. I have spent the last ten years as a paralegal and dealing with all kinds of cases. During those ten years, we represented plaintiffs and defendants.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes malpractice lawsuits are well warranted, however, sometimes they do not have legal merit. The conclusion of the article best summarizes the author’s advice to physicians faced with frivolous malpractice lawsuits when he states, “Doctors should hold the legal profession accountable when attorneys overstep. Give them a taste of their own medicine, and ask for damages. The number of frivolous cases has declined significantly since various tort reform measures have been enacted. If physicians are lucky, outrageous cases will be dismissed before too much expense is incurred.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Expert witnesses are a crucial and frequently required factor in most civil cases. An expert can be an important part of many aspect in either the prosecution or defense’s case. An expert can be utilized to introduce the evidence through their own testimonials but their role does not end there. As Douglas Heist stated expert witnesses are useful “in the development, evaluation and preparation of the defense or prosecution of a case (2010).” In most malpractice cases expert witnesses are necessary, doctors and health care professionals are needed to establish standard of care.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Crocker V. Roethling

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In a medical negligence cases, the plaintiff needs to prove that “the care of the health care provider was not in accord with the standards of practice amongst members of the same health care profession with related training and experience in similar communities at the time of the purported act giving rise to the cause of action. One of the vital elements of a claim in medical negligence is that the defendant did breach the applicable standards of medical care owed to the plaintiff. The Plaintiffs must establish the appropriate standard of care through expert testimony as seen in the case of Crocker v. Roethling, 363 N.C. 140…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malpractice Case Study

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A physician’s primary responsibility is to provide patients with the best treatment and communicate openly with them regarding their condition. In the scenario presented, Dr. Edwards examines a patient who is presenting with a cough, shortness of breath, and blood in his sputum. The patient was previously examined eight months ago for the same symptoms by Dr. Edward’s colleague who is now on medical leave. Dr. Edwards orders an x-ray and blood tests. The radiologist report concludes the presence of a lung nodule; however the radiologist also informs the Dr. Edwards the lung nodule was present 11 months ago on a prior exam.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical Malpractice Theory

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For example, in Wright's study, they found that for every 100 patients, there is one patient that files a claim when they suffer from medical malpractice (Wright, 2011). A similar study conducted by The California Medical Association found even better results as one in every 125 patients suffer from medical malpractice (Wright, 2011). This is impressive as the law profession receives upwards to six claims of negligence per a 100 clients (Kritzer & Vidmar, 2015). The problem here and why these researches are relevant to this study's research question is that despite the low number of medical malpractice claims, there is actually a large amount of medical malpractice that exists; a notion supported by 30 years’ worth of empirical research (Kritzer & Vidmar, 2015). A potential cause for these low claims is that it is hard to establish medical negligence as the claimant would need to prove before the judges, causation beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard of proof in law (Hartwell, 2005).…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort claim cost so much money to the healthcare organizations. Healthcare organizations like hospitals are making less profit because of the money they have to spend to pay for those claims. In addition, they have to provide malpractice insurance to their physicians. Moreover, tort claim would harm a healthcare organization reputation. Consequently, claims will decrease the demand for medical care causing patients to go to a different hospital or practice to seek for better…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    LAW OF TORT FILM REVIEW Kambakkht ishq Submitted to: - Prof. Aruna B. Venkat Submitted by: - Yash Aswal 1st Year-1st SEM. Roll No. 2015-57 INTRODUCTION I choose this movie because in the present scenario, medical negligence has been topic of great scrutiny.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Application Paper 1 What is medical negligence definition is that a healthcare provider’s actions or inaction deviated from the accepted standard of care. In law, the failure to do something that a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would do in a certain situation or the doing of something that such a person would not do. Negligence may provide the basis for a lawsuit when there is a legal duty, as the duty of a physician or nurse to provide reasonable care to patients and when the negligence results in damage to the patient. The failure to observe, for the protection of another person, the degree of care and vigilance that the circumstances demand, whereby such other person suffers injury.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequences of Malpractice Acts The Harvard Medical Practice Study has found that only less than two percent of injuries caused by medical negligence lead to claims. This is because, if a pharmacist negligently dispenses the wrong drug, the drug may already have broken down and excreted from the body before any test can be performed to determine the cause of the negligence. However, this should not be taken as a sign to permit the pharmacists to perform mistakes while doing their jobs. Professional negligence can lead not only to huge insurance claims and disciplinary actions from the Pharmacy Board, but gross negligence can sometimes lead to charges of manslaughter.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays